

- Title
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT BILL 2006
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
30-03-2006
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
South Australia
- Interjector
CHAIRMAN, The
- Page
40
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2006-03-30/0085
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT BILL 2006
-
In Committee
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Division
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Division
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Division
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Workplace Relations
(Hurley, Sen Annette, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Workplace Relations
(Ferris, Sen Jeannie, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Workplace Relations: Unfair Dismissal
(Brown, Sen Carol, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Cyclone Larry
(Trood, Sen Russell, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Workplace Relations
(Wong, Sen Penny, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Goods and Services Tax
(Payne, Sen Marise, Minchin, Sen Nick)
-
Workplace Relations
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Christmas Island Mining
(Siewert, Sen Rachel, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Skilled Migration
(Troeth, Sen Judith, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Funding
(Webber, Sen Ruth, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Tasmanian Forests
(Milne, Sen Christine, Minchin, Sen Nick (Leader of the Government in the Senate)) -
Regional Services: Program Funding
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Fishing Industry
(Scullion, Sen Nigel, Abetz, Sen Eric)
-
Christmas Island Mining
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- CHILDREN: SEXUAL ASSAULT
- GENETIC USE RESTRICTION TECHNOLOGIES
- CLIMATE CHANGE
- GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM JUNK FOOD ADVERTISING BILL 2006
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
-
MARITIME LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2005 [2006]
JURISDICTION OF COURTS (FAMILY LAW) BILL 2005 [2006] -
FAMILY ASSISTANCE, SOCIAL SECURITY AND VETERANS’ AFFAIRS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (2005 BUDGET AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2006
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Division
- Procedural Text
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- McLucas, Sen Jan
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Division
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Santoro, Sen Santo
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Third Reading
- CANCER AUSTRALIA BILL 2006
-
FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT (SHARED PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY) BILL 2006
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris (Manager of Government Business in the Senate)
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Division
- Ferguson, Sen Alan
- Division
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Boswell, Sen Ron
- Siewert, Sen Rachel
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Third Reading
-
- ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER
- COMMITTEES
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Advertising Campaigns
(Evans, Sen Chris, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Aviation
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Princess Royal Harbour
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Australian Defence Force Personnel
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Defence Security Project JP2054
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Commonwealth State Territory Disability Agreement
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Industry, Tourism and Resources: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Industry, Tourism and Resources: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Defence: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Transport and Regional Services: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Industry, Tourism and Resources: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Industry, Tourism and Resources: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Transport and Regional Services: Grants
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Transport and Regional Services: Credit Cards
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Australian Defence Force: Summernats
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Guantanamo Bay
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Tasmania: Foxes
(Brown, Sen Bob, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Tasmania: Giant Freshwater Crayfish
(Brown, Sen Bob, Campbell, Sen Ian)
-
Advertising Campaigns
Page: 40
Senator STOTT DESPOJA (12:23 PM)
—by leave—The Democrats amendments oppose schedule 2 in the following terms:
(18) Schedule 2, item 1, page 62 (lines 5 to 11), TO BE OPPOSED.
(19) Schedule 2, item 2, page 62 (lines 5 to 15), TO BE OPPOSED.
(20) Schedule 2, item 3, page 62 (lines 3 to 26), TO BE OPPOSED.
(21) Schedule 2, item 4, page 62 (lines 27 and 28), TO BE OPPOSED.
The intent of the Democrat amendments is to remove the Attorney-General’s power to issue B-party warrants for ASIO. I want to make it very clear that we are talking about B-party warrants for ASIO and removing the ability of the Attorney-General to issue those warrants. We believe that it is an important safeguard that should be implemented in order to maintain a relatively high level of oversight. These changes should be passed because of the high possibility of privacy invasions under B-party warrants. Once again, I want to make it very clear that we are talking about ASIO and the Attorney-General’s power to issue those warrants to them. This is different from the issue of B-party warrants generally; it is specifically dealing with ASIO B-party warrants. Therefore, I hope the Senate will, with the recognition of that specificity, recognise the need to take that power away from the Attorney-General.