

- Title
ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPPORTUNITIES BILL 2005
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
27-02-2006
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
Tasmania
- Interjector
CHAIRMAN, The
- Page
21
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2006-02-27/0024
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
-
ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPPORTUNITIES BILL 2005
-
In Committee
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Fielding, Sen Steve
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
New Apprenticeships
(Lightfoot, Sen Ross, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Australian Values
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Melbourne Commonwealth Games
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Telstra
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Advertising: Censorship
(Brown, Sen Bob, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Telstra
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Coonan, Sen Helen)
-
New Apprenticeships
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES
- PARLIAMENT HOUSE SECURITY
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- DOCUMENTS
- ILLEGAL FISHING
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
-
STUDENT ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2005
FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2005
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 3) 2005-2006
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 4) 2005-2006 -
DEFENCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (AID TO CIVILIAN AUTHORITIES) BILL 2006
DEFENCE (ROAD TRANSPORT LEGISLATION EXEMPTION) BILL 2005 [2006]
THERAPEUTIC GOODS AMENDMENT (REPEAL OF MINISTERIAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR APPROVAL OF RU486) BILL 2005 [2006] - COMMITTEES
-
AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP BILL 2005
AUSTRALIAN CITIZENSHIP (TRANSITIONALS AND CONSEQUENTIALS) BILL 2005 - CENSUS INFORMATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2005
- TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (PERSONAL INJURIES AND DEATH) BILL 2004
-
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM BILL 2005
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM (ANNUAL FEES) BILL 2005
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM (REGISTRATION FEES) BILL 2005
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM (REPEALS AND CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2005
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM (ROYALTY) BILL 2005
OFFSHORE PETROLEUM (SAFETY LEVIES) AMENDMENT BILL 2005- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- O’Brien, Sen Kerry
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Milne, Sen Christine
- Colbeck, Sen Richard
- Milne, Sen Christine
- FUTURE FUND BILL 2005
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Treasury: Consultants
(Evans, Sen Chris, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Health and Ageing: Consultants
(Evans, Sen Chris, Santoro, Sen Santo) -
Finance and Administration: Consultants
(Evans, Sen Chris, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Finance and Administration: Consultants
(Evans, Sen Chris, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Overseas Travel
(Evans, Sen Chris, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Health and Ageing: Customer Service
(Evans, Sen Chris, Santoro, Sen Santo) -
Asylum Seekers
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
International Students: Private Health Insurance
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Military Compensation and Rehabilitation Scheme
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
National Security Advertising Campaign
(Faulkner, Sen John, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Biofuels
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Centrelink: Reviews
(Evans, Sen Chris, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Lithuanian War Criminals
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Carers
(Evans, Sen Chris, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Carers
(Evans, Sen Chris, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Australian Customs Service:
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Road Accidents
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Gynaecological Cancers
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Santoro, Sen Santo) -
Defence Science and Technology Organisation Rationalisation Project
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Cash Services Australia
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Independent Probity Supervisers
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Hillsong Emerge Projects
(Evans, Sen Chris, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Australian Customs Service: Integrated Cargo System
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Temporary Business Visas
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Papua
(Brown, Sen Bob, Coonan, Sen Helen)
-
Treasury: Consultants
Page: 21
Senator O’BRIEN (1:50 PM)
—The opposition will be supporting this amendment. We do think it is a modest request but very worthy of our support. We agree that the issues which have been canvassed in this debate are extremely important to the Australian public and, indeed, to the whole of this globe, and we think it is extremely reasonable to ask that the operation of the propositions which the government have embodied in this bill with the amendments that they have proposed ought to be subject to an independent review and that review should not just sit on the desk of the minister when it has been conducted—it should be made public. Therefore, subclause (3) of this amendment, which would require the report of that review to be tabled in each house of parliament, places the matter fairly and squarely before the public and requires the government of the day—whoever it might be at that time—to table that report so that there can be full public knowledge. We know of no reason why the government would not support this other than that they may be unhappy about scrutiny of their actions. Their support or otherwise of this amendment will show whether the government are prepared to be open and transparent in their dealings with issues as important as this.