

- Title
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Telecommunications: Mobile Phone Towers
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
09-02-2005
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
Tasmania
- Interjector
- Page
154
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
70
- Questioner
Brown, Sen Bob
- Responder
Coonan, Sen Helen
- Speaker
- Stage
Telecommunications: Mobile Phone Towers
- Type
- Context
Answers to Questions on Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2005-02-09/0209
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUDGET
- SENATE TEMPORAR9.31 A.M.ORDERS
- BUSINESS
- DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION AMENDMENT (EDUCATION STANDARDS) BILL 2004 [2005]
-
BANKRUPTCY AND FAMILY LAW LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2004 [2005]
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Third Reading
-
SUPERANNUATION SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
AUTHORISED DEPOSIT-TAKING INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
LIFE INSURANCE SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
GENERAL INSURANCE SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
RETIREMENT SAVINGS ACCOUNT PROVIDERS SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
AUTHORISED NON-OPERATING HOLDING COMPANIES SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004 - FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISORY LEVIES COLLECTION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Ms Cornelia Rau
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Environment: Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(Lightfoot, Sen Ross, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Ms Cornelia Rau
(Kirk, Sen Linda, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Information Technology: Internet Content
(Payne, Sen Marise, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
South Australia: Bushfires
(Bolkus, Sen Nick, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Ms Cornelia Rau
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Economy: Foreign Debt
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Environment: Water Management
(Lees, Sen Meg, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Economy: Foreign Debt
(Lundy, Sen Kate, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Family Services: Family Payments
(Eggleston, Sen Alan, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Economy: Foreign Debt
(Cook, Sen Peter, Hill, Sen Robert)
-
Ms Cornelia Rau
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- FAMILY SERVICES: CHILD CARE
- ENVIRONMENT: KYOTO PROTOCOL
- COMMITTEES
- MS CORNELIA RAU
- MR ZHAO ZIYANG
- COMMITTEES
- INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI
- FEDERATION OF ETHNIC COMMUNITIES COUNCIL’S TRANSFORMATIONS CONFERENCE
- SHROVE TUESDAY
- NEW ZEALAND: WAITANGI DAY
- SRI LANKA: INDEPENDENCE COMMEMORATION DAY
- AUSCHWITZ: ANNIVERSARY
- VIETNAMESE NEW YEAR
- COMMITTEES
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- FAMILY ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (ADJUSTMENT OF CERTAIN FTB CHILD RATES) BILL 2004
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- COMMITTEES
-
SUPERANNUATION SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
AUTHORISED DEPOSIT-TAKING INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
LIFE INSURANCE SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
GENERAL INSURANCE SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
RETIREMENT SAVINGS ACCOUNT PROVIDERS SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
AUTHORISED NON-OPERATING HOLDING COMPANIES SUPERVISORY LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS SUPERVISORY LEVIES COLLECTION AMENDMENT BILL 2004 - GOVERNOR-GENERAL’S SPEECH
-
DOCUMENTS
- Report to the Commonwealth under Air Passenger Ticket Levy (Collection) Act 2001
- Independent Review of the National Environment Protection Measures (Implementation) Act 1988
- Roads: Roads to Recovery Program
-
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Defence: Exercises
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Taxation: Charitable Institutions
(Greig, Sen Brian, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Telecommunications: Mobile Phone Towers
(Brown, Sen Bob, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Communications: Casualties of Telstra
(Brown, Sen Bob, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Superannuation: Compliance
(Brown, Sen Bob, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Superannuation: Contributions
(Brown, Sen Bob, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Telstra: Directory Services
(Brown, Sen Bob, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Taxation: Mass Marketed Schemes
(Webber, Sen Ruth, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
National Equine and Livestock Centre
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
National Equine and Livestock Centre
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Telecommunications: Mobile Phone Towers
(Nettle, Sen Kerry, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Environment: Recherche Bay
(Brown, Sen Bob, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Drugs: Illicit Usage
(Brown, Sen Bob, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Taxation: Income Tax
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Murray-Darling Basin: Report
(Brown, Sen Bob, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Murray-Darling Basin: Report
(Brown, Sen Bob, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Commonwealth: Badgerys Creek Properties
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Transport: Federal Interstate Registration Scheme
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Primary Energy Ltd
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Primary Energy Ltd
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Primary Energy Ltd
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Hon. De-Anne Kelly, MP
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Industry, Tourism and Resources: Programs
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Aviation: Melbourne Airport
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Remote Air Service Subsidy Scheme
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Roads: Roads to Recovery Program
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Bert Hinkler Hall of Aviation Museum
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Sustainable Regions Program
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Fuel: Ethanol
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Ansett Australia: Employee Entitlements
(O’Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Parliamentary Services: Secretary
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, PRESIDENT, The) -
Parliament: Joint House Department
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, PRESIDENT, The) -
Parliament: Department of the Parliamentary Reporting Staff
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, PRESIDENT, The) -
Parliament: Department of the Parliamentary Library
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, PRESIDENT, The)
-
Defence: Exercises
Page: 154
Senator Brown
asked the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, upon notice, on 18 November 2004:
(1) Does the Government support Telstra’s decision to appeal against the decision of a democratically elected local government which refused to allow the construction of a telecommunications tower at Bindaree Road; if so, does the Government believe that Telstra’s agenda should override the wishes of a local community.
(2) Does the Government consider that Telstra’s decision to refuse to discuss alternative sites at a mediation meeting that it facilitated is reasonable.
(3) What regulations are in place concerning the placing of telecommunications towers in close proximity to residences.
(4) What regulations are in place to prevent Telstra constructing telecommunications towers in existing electrical transmission corridors.
(5) Taking into account the precautionary principle, can the Government guarantee that no adverse human health effects result from living in close proximity to telecommunications towers; if so, why has the Government allocated further funding for on-going research into potential health risks from electro-magnetic emissions devices and phone towers.
Senator Coonan (Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts)
—The response is based in part on advice received from Telstra. The answer to the honourable senator’s question is as follows:
(1) The decision to appeal the decision by the West Tamar Council is a matter for Telstra.
Although Telstra remains partially Government-owned, it has been an independent corporation since 1991. Telstra’s Board and management are responsible for the day to day running of the company’s operations. The Government’s role is to establish the legislative framework within which all telecommunications service providers (including Telstra) must operate. Consequently the Government is unable to intervene with respect to operational issues or disputes that arise from the conduct of Telstra’s daily business.
Approvals for most telecommunications facilities, including the majority of mobile telecommunications towers, are dealt with by relevant State and Territory authorities, usually at the local level. Only in a limited number of circumstances are carriers immune from State and Territory laws, notably in the installation of ‘low-impact facilities’ - those that are essential to maintaining telecommunications networks, but are of low visual impact.
All carriers, including Telstra, must comply with the relevant State or Territory planning legislation, and are subject to the local planning processes.
State or Territory legislation may make provision for appeals against a Council decision.
(2) The location of mobile phone towers, including the consideration of alternative sites is a commercial matter for Telstra to determine, consistent with the Tasmanian State planning legislation.
Telstra advised that a mediation conference was held with concerned residents on 26 February 2004. Telstra explained the sites it reviewed as options for the mobile phone tower and outlined the precautionary approach it used in selecting the Bindaree Road site as the best option for Telstra’s facility. Telstra also listened to site suggestions put forward by others at the meeting, but said that these options did not meet the mobile coverage objectives for the site.
(3) The Government’s framework for the telecommunications sector seeks to achieve a reasonable balance between individual local and broader regional and national interests. Through its reform of the telecommunications sector, the Government has sought to encourage competition to give Australians greater access to a wide range of high quality, low cost telecommunications services. Approvals for the installation of most telecommunications facilities, however, are dealt with at the local level. In particular, State and Territory legislation covers the installation of mobile phone towers. This arrangement ensures that the rollout of modern telecommunications networks is encouraged, while taking into account individual communities’ local concerns and interests.
It is impractical for the Government to legislate at a micro-level all telecommunications activities, both due to the technical nature of the industry and the cost. Encouraging good industry practice through self-regulatory mechanisms such as industry codes of practice and technical standards is an important strategy.
The Government has encouraged the telecommunications industry to develop and implement the Australian Communications Industry Forum (ACIF) Deployment of Radiocommunications Infrastructure Code (the Industry Code), that provides for additional consultation arrangements for low-impact facilities and some improved methods for addressing concerns about electromagnetic energy (EME) emission levels for all radiocommunication facilities installed under Commonwealth and State and Territory laws. The Industry Code requires carriers to have regard to ‘community sensitive locations’ such as residential areas when locating telecommunication facilities.
(4) Placement of a telecommunications tower within the constraints of the relevant state planning legislation and the industry code, is a commercial matter for carriers.
Regulatory arrangements do not discourage carriers from installing their infrastructure on towers belonging to other carriers, or on public infrastructure such as electricity towers. Indeed, carriers are required to consider opportunities for co-locating new telecommunications facilities on any existing tower or public utility structure, and it is the Government’s long-standing policy to encourage carriers to co-locate where possible.
(5) The Government recognises there is some concern in the Australian community about the possibility of long-term effects on health of exposure to electromagnetic energy (EME) emissions used in mobile telephony. The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA), within the Health and Ageing portfolio, sets the standard for public occupational limits of exposure to radiofrequency emissions.
The ACA, in conjunction with ARPANSA, has recently launched an information package on EME and mobile phones. All the information in the package can be accessed through the website at http://emr.aca.gov.au.
The Government has provided $4.5 million over four and a half years for the Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Energy (EME) Program. The EME Program supports research into and provides information to the public about health issues associated with mobile phones, mobile phone base stations, and other communications devices and equipment.