

- Title
NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION (CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS) BILL 2004
NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION (CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS) (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2004
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
30-11-2004
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
Western Australia
- Interjector
- Page
84
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Greig, Sen Brian
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2004-11-30/0162
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- COPYRIGHT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- FISHERIES (VALIDATION OF PLANS OF MANAGEMENT) BILL 2004
- FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT (ANNUITIES) BILL 2004
-
SURVEILLANCE DEVICES BILL 2004
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Regional Services: Program Funding
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Economy: Demographic Trends
(Brandis, Sen George, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Regional Services: Program Funding
(Carr, Sen Kim, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Superannuation: Contributions
(McGauran, Sen Julian, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Federal Election: Member for New England
(Kirk, Sen Linda, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Howard Government: Government Appointments
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Economy: Current Account Deficit
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Environment: Endangered Species
(Brown, Sen Bob, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Finance: Special Appropriations
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Immigration: Refugees
(Payne, Sen Marise, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Centrelink: Auditor-General's Report No. 15
(Moore, Sen Claire, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Environment: Mandatory Renewable Energy Target
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Campbell, Sen Ian)
-
Regional Services: Program Funding
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- EUREKA STOCKADE: 150TH ANNIVERSARY
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- PRISONS: DRUG USE
- BUSINESS
- HEALTH: MATERNITY SERVICES
- IRAQ
- DOCUMENTS
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- COMMITTEES
- CUSTOMS (PROHIBITED IMPORTS) AMENDMENT REGULATION 2004 (NO. 3)
-
SURVEILLANCE DEVICES BILL 2004
-
In Committee
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- CONDOLENCES
-
NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION (CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS) BILL 2004
NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION (CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS) (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2004- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 84
Senator GREIG (6:07 PM)
—This amendment is also relevant to opposition amendment (2), which puts beyond doubt that a court can make an order to stay proceedings if a section 31 order preventing the disclosure of information would have a substantial adverse effect on the defendant's right to receive a fair hearing. Opposition amendment (1) defines `substantial adverse effect' as meaning `not insubstantial, insignificant or trivial'. We Democrats do not see a great need for the amendment, given that a court would be well equipped to determine whether the section 31 order has a substantial adverse effect on the defendant's right to receive a fair hearing. However, on balance, we do not oppose the amendment.
Question agreed to.