

- Title
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT (STORED COMMUNICATIONS) BILL 2004
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
29-11-2004
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
41
- Electorate
Tasmania
- Interjector
- Page
87
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Brown, Sen Bob
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2004-11-29/0099
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT (STORED COMMUNICATIONS) BILL 2004
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Health: Asbestos Related Disease
(Wong, Sen Penny, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Environment: Murray-Darling River System
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Regional Services: Program Funding
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Forestry: Policy
(Watson, Sen John, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Regional Services: Program Funding
(Campbell, Sen George, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Indigenous Affairs: Deaths in Custody
(Ridgeway, Sen Aden, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Howard Government: Expenditure
(Carr, Sen Kim, Hill, Robert (Leader of the Government in the Senate), Hill, Sen Robert) -
Environment: Murray-Darling River System
(Lees, Sen Meg, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Regional Services: Program Funding
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Communications: Community Broadcasting
(Santoro, Sen Santo, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Regional Services: Program Funding
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Campbell, Sen Ian)
-
Health: Asbestos Related Disease
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- CONDOLENCES
- PETITIONS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- HUMAN RIGHTS: WESTERN SAHARA
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (AGREEMENT VALIDATION) BILL 2004
-
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT (STORED COMMUNICATIONS) BILL 2004
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Third Reading
- BUSINESS
- FISHERIES (VALIDATION OF PLANS OF MANAGEMENT) BILL 2004
- FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT (ANNUITIES) BILL 2004
- BANKRUPTCY AND FAMILY LAW LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- GOVERNOR-GENERAL'S SPEECH
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 87
Senator BROWN (5:56 PM)
—I had another question about private businesses and individuals, which the minister might answer. But, before he does, I want to disagree with what he has had to say. My first issue goes to intercepting live communication—that is, a telephone conversation—and the second goes to stored information and the ability to fish through potentially hundreds of such live communications, which are then stored on the shelf. So the reach into the private affairs of individuals is far greater than being able to connect into a single telephone conversation and therefore needs far greater care. But what is happening here is that the barrier is being lowered, not increased.
What is more, when it comes to this sort of investigation with modern technology, the citizen has no way of knowing that it is occurring. If somebody searches your house for the document on your desk that the minister was taking about, there is a fair chance you will find out about it. But, in the case of a document being stored electronically and then a search being made, you have no way of knowing that that is occurring, that it will occur or that it has occurred, and therefore we need to be much more vigilant against it.
The requirement that should be in place here is at the very lowest level. I ask the minister again: will these powers be limited to the investigation of serious crime, including terrorism? Is it possible, through civil procedures or through any other manner, to exclude private businesses and individuals from gaining access to this ability to rake through stored communications on Australian citizens?