

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
Discrimination: Sexual Harassment
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
01-04-2004
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
Western Australia
- Interjector
- Page
22638
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stage
Discrimination: Sexual Harassment
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2004-04-01/0169
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES
- HAMER, SIR RUPERT
- HEALTH AND AGEING: AGED CARE
- PARLIAMENT HOUSE: ART COLLECTION
- UNITED NATIONS: HUMAN RIGHTS
- IMMIGRATION: VISA APPROVALS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- ENVIRONMENT: ENDANGERED SPECIES
- FORESTRY: REGIONAL FOREST AGREEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- HEALTH: DISABILITY SERVICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL AMENDMENT (REPRESENTATION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) BILL 2004
- LAW AND JUSTICE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- BUSINESS
-
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
EXCISE TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2003 - TEXTILE, CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BUSINESS
- INTELLIGENCE SERVICES AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BUSINESS
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL AMENDMENT (REPRESENTATION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) BILL 2004
- TAXATION LAWS (CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT FACILITY SUPPORT) BILL 2003
- SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (FAMILY LAW) BILL 2002
- DAIRY PRODUCE AMENDMENT BILL 2003
- REPRESENTATION OF VICTORIA
- SENATORS SWORN
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Taxation: Family Payments
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Taxation: Family Payments
(Knowles, Sen Susan, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Family and Community Services
(Faulkner, Sen John, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Indigenous Affairs: Health
(Ridgeway, Sen Aden, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
National Security: Intelligence
(Ray, Sen Robert, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Resources: Renewable Energy
(Lees, Sen Meg, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Indigenous Affairs: ATSIS
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Immigration: Economic Impact
(Santoro, Sen Santo, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Family and Community Services
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Patterson, Sen Kay)
-
Taxation: Family Payments
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- PARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
-
COMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Third Reading
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2002
- FAMILY ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (EXTENSION OF TIME LIMITS) BILL 2003
- BUSINESS
- KYOTO PROTOCOL RATIFICATION BILL 2003 [NO. 2]
- APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 2) 2003-2004
- APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 3) 2003-2004
- APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 4) 2003-2004
- ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- HUMAN RIGHTS: KURDS
- COMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Immigration: Detainees
(Lees, Sen Meg, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Immigration: Detainees
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Customs: Advance Passenger Processing System
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Australian Customs Service: Personnel
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Aviation: Tasmania
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian)
-
Immigration: Detainees
Page: 22638
Senator ELLISON (Minister for Justice and Customs) (3:33 PM)
—During question time on 31 March 2004, Senator Harradine asked me a question, in my capacity as the Minister representing the Attorney-General, concerning sexual harassment in the workplace and advertising. I undertook to provide further information in relation to certain advertisements and seek leave to incorporate in Hansard the answer which has been provided to me.
Leave granted.
The answer read as follows—
Overview of Advertising Standards Bureau (ASB)
The self-regulatory system, now managed by the Advertising Standards Bureau (ASB) and funded voluntarily by the industry through the Australian Advertising Standards Council, recognises that advertisers share a common interest in promoting consumer confidence in and respect for general standards of advertising.
The Advertising Standards Bureau administers this national voluntary system of advertising self regulation through the Advertising Standards Board and Advertising Claims Board.
The Advertising Standards Board provides a free public service in complaint resolution. It provides determinations on complaints about most forms of advertising in relation to issues including the use of language, the discriminatory portrayal of people, concern for children, portrayals of violence, sex, sexuality and nudity, and health and safety.
The Advertising Claims Board provides a competitive complaint resolution service. It is designed to determine complaints involving issues of truth, accuracy and legality of advertising on a user pays cost recovery basis. For more information about the Claims Board, see Industry Guide.
Both boards make their determinations under appropriate sections of the Advertiser Code of Ethics, as prescribed by the Australian Association of National Advertisers (AANA) following principles laid down by the Australian Parliament as reflective of community values.
This system of advertising self regulation came into operation following the 1996 decision of the Media Council of Australia to disband its system of advertising codes and regulation, including the Advertising Standards Council. Resulting from extensive consultation with industry, government and consumer representatives, it fulfils a longstanding AANA commitment to develop a more effective system of self regulation for the advertising industry.
Specific Advertisements Raised by Senator Harradine (Double A copy paper and Cougar series)
Double A copy paper advertisement will be considered by the ASB board in the coming weeks. There have been several consumer complaints lodged in response to this advertisement.
Complaints against the Cougar series advertisements have been dismissed. Please see the determinations for both Cougar ads as follows:
Cougar ad 1:
1. | Complaint reference number | 306/01 |
2. | Advertiser | Continental Spirits Co. (Cougar Bourbon) |
3. | Product | Alcohol |
4. | Type of advertisement | Television |
5. | Nature ofcomplaint | Portrayal of sex/ sexuality/nudity Discrimination/ Vilification Health & Safety |
6. | Date of determination | November 13 2001 |
7. | DETERMINATION | COMPLAINT DISMISSED |
DESCRIPTION OF THE ADVERTISEMENT
The television advertisement opens on a dance party scene, where a young male queuing for service at the bar is repeating his intended order, saying: “Two gin and tonics, two vodkas, and a scotch.” when he eventually reaches the front of the queue, he is seen to stare at the barmaid and say: “Five Cougars thanks.” When the shot changes to show his point of view, the large-breasted barmaid is seen to be wearing a top with `Cougar Bourbon' emblazoned across her chest. The male is shown to blink as he looks down to some change on the bar, alongside a coaster promoting the Cougar Bourbon and a jar of coins labelled “Tips.”
THE COMPLAINT
Comments which the complainants made regarding this advertisement included the following:
`I feel this ad is sexist, offensive, demeaning, and sends a negative body image to young women. Cougars cross-media campaign centres around scantily clad, busty females...'
`The ad was offensive as it blatantly used a woman's breasts to advertise...'
THE DETERMINATION
The Advertising Standards Board (`the Board') considered whether this advertisement breaches Section 2 of the Advertiser Code of Ethics (`the Code').
The Board believed most television viewers would see humour in the commercial, and determined that it did not contravene the Code in relation to the portrayal of sex/sexuality/nudity.
It further found that the content of the advertisement did not constitute discrimination and/or vilification, and that it did not breach the health and safety provisions of the Code. Accordingly, the complaint was dismissed.
Cougar ad 2:
1. | Complaint reference number | 221/02 |
2. | Advertiser | Foster's Group Ltd (Cougar Bourbon) |
3. | Product | Alcohol |
4. | Type of advertisement | TV |
5. | Nature of complaint | Portrayal of sex/ sexuality/nudity |
6. | Date of determination | September 10 2002 |
7. | DETERMINATION | COMPLAINT DISMISSED |
DESCRIPTION OF THE ADVERTISEMENT
`This advertisement depicts a group of men in a bar. One of the men goes to the bar and asks for a `cougar', as the female bar attendant reaches for the bottle her skirt raises slightly revealing the top of her legs and the man is looking. As she bends to get a slice of lemon, the man appears to be looking at her cleavage. He glances towards his friends who cheer and rise from their seats ahead of a final caption reading: “Cougar-real smooth Bourbon.” The advertisement ends with a smiling bar attendant handing the man his requested drink.
THE COMPLAINT
Comments which the complainant/s made regarding this advertisement :following included the following:
“.... (the advertisement) is unacceptable due to its content which I find to be demeaning and offensive towards women. This insulting advertising campaign borders on soft porn..(it) is sexist and gender based ...I feel that they have underestimated the audience and isolated any potential consumers that do not fit into this mould...”
THE DETERMINATION
The Advertising Standards Board (`the Board') considered whether this advertisement breaches Section 2 of the Advertiser Code of Ethics (`the Code').
The Board found that the advertisement did not breach the Code on any grounds, and, accordingly dismissed the complaint.
In reaching its decision, the Board noted the advertiser's explanation that the advertisement was intentionally light-hearted, was only aired in `adult-time,' and was approved by FACTS and the alcohol pre-vetting system.