

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
National Security: Intelligence
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
01-04-2004
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
New South Wales
- Interjector
Brandis, Sen George
Ray, Sen Robert
- Page
22632
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Faulkner, Sen John
- Stage
National Security: Intelligence
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2004-04-01/0162
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES
- HAMER, SIR RUPERT
- HEALTH AND AGEING: AGED CARE
- PARLIAMENT HOUSE: ART COLLECTION
- UNITED NATIONS: HUMAN RIGHTS
- IMMIGRATION: VISA APPROVALS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- ENVIRONMENT: ENDANGERED SPECIES
- FORESTRY: REGIONAL FOREST AGREEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- HEALTH: DISABILITY SERVICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL AMENDMENT (REPRESENTATION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) BILL 2004
- LAW AND JUSTICE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- BUSINESS
-
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
EXCISE TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2003 - TEXTILE, CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BUSINESS
- INTELLIGENCE SERVICES AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BUSINESS
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL AMENDMENT (REPRESENTATION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) BILL 2004
- TAXATION LAWS (CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT FACILITY SUPPORT) BILL 2003
- SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (FAMILY LAW) BILL 2002
- DAIRY PRODUCE AMENDMENT BILL 2003
- REPRESENTATION OF VICTORIA
- SENATORS SWORN
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Taxation: Family Payments
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Taxation: Family Payments
(Knowles, Sen Susan, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Family and Community Services
(Faulkner, Sen John, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Indigenous Affairs: Health
(Ridgeway, Sen Aden, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
National Security: Intelligence
(Ray, Sen Robert, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Resources: Renewable Energy
(Lees, Sen Meg, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Indigenous Affairs: ATSIS
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Immigration: Economic Impact
(Santoro, Sen Santo, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Family and Community Services
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Patterson, Sen Kay)
-
Taxation: Family Payments
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- PARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
-
COMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Third Reading
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2002
- FAMILY ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (EXTENSION OF TIME LIMITS) BILL 2003
- BUSINESS
- KYOTO PROTOCOL RATIFICATION BILL 2003 [NO. 2]
- APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 2) 2003-2004
- APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 3) 2003-2004
- APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 4) 2003-2004
- ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- HUMAN RIGHTS: KURDS
- COMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Immigration: Detainees
(Lees, Sen Meg, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Immigration: Detainees
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Customs: Advance Passenger Processing System
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Australian Customs Service: Personnel
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Aviation: Tasmania
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian)
-
Immigration: Detainees
Page: 22632
Senator FAULKNER (Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) (3:07 PM)
—I move:
That the Senate take note of the answers given by the Minister for Defence (Senator Hill) to questions without notice asked by Senators Evans and Ray today relating to the briefing of the Leader of the Opposition (Mr Latham) on intelligence matters.
Mr Howard is the only Prime Minister of Australia ever to have embroiled our intelligence agencies in domestic political debate. No other Prime Minister has ever done that. No other Prime Minister in memory would even have considered that such a course of action would be appropriate. These private confidential briefings of the Leader of the Opposition by senior intelligence officials are a longstanding convention. In the case of ASIS and ASIO, they are underpinned by legislation. For example, section 19 of the Intelligence Services Act requires the Director-General of ASIS to consult regularly with the Leader of the Opposition for the purpose of keeping him or her informed of matters relating to ASIS. By bringing these briefings into the public domain the Prime Minister, Mr Howard, has compromised their value. Why would officials give full and frank briefings in future, knowing they may well be made public, whenever they might serve the supposedly partisan interests of the government?
Will leaders of the opposition continue to seek such briefings, knowing that their privacy and their confidentiality may not be respected by government? Is the public interest served by the politicisation and corruption of this very important convention that has, until now, stood the test of time? But does the Prime Minister, ostensibly in our system the guardian of these conventions, care about these matters? He does not care. He coerces public servants in this country into supporting the government line, and that is now a familiar tactic of Mr Howard and the government.
The Prime Minister has extracted a letter from the deputy secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. He has extracted a letter from the Secretary of the Department of Defence. He has extracted a letter from the Director-General of ASIS. He has another one from the Deputy Secretary of the Department of Defence. Poor Mr Bonighton. He is probably on the rack right now as we speak—on the rack again.
Senator FAULKNER
—No doubt the Prime Minister will get Mr Bonighton to sign up to an even more fulsome description of his briefing with Mr Latham. The last one did not quite do the trick. The Prime Minister today has run away, with his tail between his legs, licking his wounds, because he has been bested by Mr Latham in the parliament on this issue. The Prime Minister is wrong. Remember, this is the same Prime Minister who used classified intelligence to try to back up his claim that kids had been thrown overboard. He is the same Prime Minister who used the Office of National Assessments to dig himself out of a hole on WMDs—we all know about that. It is the same Prime Minister who demanded retractions from Vice Admiral Shackleton. It is the same Prime Minister who stood over Police Commissioner Keelty. Of course, all these people departed from the government line, even though they told the truth to the Australian people. The modus operandi of the government is to use public servants and to use classified information for partisan political purposes. How low can you go?
That is the hallmark of the Howard government, and there is only one way to stop it: to remove John Howard from the prime ministership. He is a person who will not change his spots. This is a pattern of behaviour that is utterly despicable, utterly contemptible. He has indulged in this destructive behaviour far too often. Until John Howard is removed from office, he will continue to abuse these longstanding conventions. What this says, of course is that the sooner he is gone the better. (Time expired)
Senator Robert Ray
—Mr Deputy President, I rise on a point of order. I did not want to interrupt my leader when he was so destroying the government, but Senator Brandis on two occasions was deliberately and maliciously unparliamentary. Given the homily read out by the President, I think he should withdraw. He knows he should, and he should do it now.
Senator Brandis
—I withdraw.