

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Taxation: Family Payments
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
01-04-2004
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
PRESIDENT, The
Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Page
22616
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Responder
Patterson, Sen Kay
- Speaker
- Stage
Taxation: Family Payments
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2004-04-01/0143
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES
- HAMER, SIR RUPERT
- HEALTH AND AGEING: AGED CARE
- PARLIAMENT HOUSE: ART COLLECTION
- UNITED NATIONS: HUMAN RIGHTS
- IMMIGRATION: VISA APPROVALS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- ENVIRONMENT: ENDANGERED SPECIES
- FORESTRY: REGIONAL FOREST AGREEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- HEALTH: DISABILITY SERVICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL AMENDMENT (REPRESENTATION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) BILL 2004
- LAW AND JUSTICE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- BUSINESS
-
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
EXCISE TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2003 - TEXTILE, CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BUSINESS
- INTELLIGENCE SERVICES AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- BUSINESS
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL AMENDMENT (REPRESENTATION IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES) BILL 2004
- TAXATION LAWS (CLEARING AND SETTLEMENT FACILITY SUPPORT) BILL 2003
- SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (FAMILY LAW) BILL 2002
- DAIRY PRODUCE AMENDMENT BILL 2003
- REPRESENTATION OF VICTORIA
- SENATORS SWORN
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Taxation: Family Payments
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Taxation: Family Payments
(Knowles, Sen Susan, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Family and Community Services
(Faulkner, Sen John, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Indigenous Affairs: Health
(Ridgeway, Sen Aden, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
National Security: Intelligence
(Ray, Sen Robert, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Resources: Renewable Energy
(Lees, Sen Meg, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Indigenous Affairs: ATSIS
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Immigration: Economic Impact
(Santoro, Sen Santo, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Family and Community Services
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Patterson, Sen Kay)
-
Taxation: Family Payments
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- PARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS
- TELECOMMUNICATIONS (INTERCEPTION) AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
-
COMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bishop, Sen Mark
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Third Reading
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2002
- FAMILY ASSISTANCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (EXTENSION OF TIME LIMITS) BILL 2003
- BUSINESS
- KYOTO PROTOCOL RATIFICATION BILL 2003 [NO. 2]
- APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 2) 2003-2004
- APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 3) 2003-2004
- APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 4) 2003-2004
- ADVANCE TO THE FINANCE MINISTER
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- HUMAN RIGHTS: KURDS
- COMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Immigration: Detainees
(Lees, Sen Meg, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Immigration: Detainees
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Customs: Advance Passenger Processing System
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Australian Customs Service: Personnel
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Aviation: Tasmania
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Campbell, Sen Ian)
-
Immigration: Detainees
Page: 22616
Senator JACINTA COLLINS (2:03 PM)
—My question is to Senator Patterson, the Minister for Family and Community Services.
Honourable senators interjecting—
The PRESIDENT
—Order! Are we going to start our last question time for these sittings with that sort of noise? I am not going to accept it today. We will have some peace and quiet.
Senator JACINTA COLLINS
—Does the minister recall the leaked cabinet minute of 17 December 2002 which states that cabinet had noted:
... that pressures remain on families in the transition to parenthood ... including: a particularly sharp fall in income against which families receive varying levels of government assistance.
Why has the government still not acted on this 2002 cabinet minute note, which recommended improving financial assistance at the time of the birth of a child? Will the government now deliver on its three-year-old promise to help families balance their work and family responsibilities by developing an alternative policy which would deliver timely assistance on the birth of a child?
Senator PATTERSON (Minister for Family and Community Services and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Status of Women)
—The question gives me the opportunity to remind honourable senators and the community of what the government have done for families in assisting them to balance work and family. We have given families $19 billion a year in assistance. That is almost $2 billion a year more in family assistance since the introduction of the new family tax system. We have given families assistance—particularly where one member of the family chooses to stay at home—through family tax benefit B, by providing almost $2,900 for each child under five. We have also given families assistance with child care by doubling the amount of funding that has been spent on child care from $4 billion to $8 billion since we came to government.
Senator PATTERSON
—Senator Collins does not want to hear this, but she is going to have to listen to the facts. She does not like to hear that we have actually doubled spending on child care. We have increased the number of child-care places by 210,000, to 530,000. We have also assisted families to balance work and family by introducing much more flexible workplaces. Labor are so inflexible in their slavery to unions that families do not have the opportunity to have flexible workplaces that deal with balancing their work and family. Labor have always failed to cost and fund their policies. When they were in government, they racked up $60 billion worth of debt, on which we were paying almost $5 billion a year in interest. You would think they would have learnt that when you borrow you have to pay interest—in this case, $5 billion in interest. That is money we can now spend on assisting families through the Stronger Families and Communities program. We can assist them in caring for their families.
But Labor did not care. They borrowed from the next generation of children. They did not build for the future. Senator Collins shrugs her shoulders and closes her eyes because she does not want to hear that we have increased assistance to families by almost $2 billion a year since the introduction of the new family tax system. We have doubled the spending on child care, we have increased the number of child-care places by 210,000 and we have increased flexibility in the workplace to assist families to balance work and family.
Senator JACINTA COLLINS
—Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. Is the minister aware that there are no budget papers or portfolio statements in existence that can verify the Treasurer's extraordinary claim that the baby bonus spending has been revised down by $347 million in the forward estimates? Has the government hidden these budget numbers because there is a secret plan to scrap the baby bonus, or is it just that Mr Costello cannot admit that a policy that he once described as `the centrepiece of the government's election platform' is a massive flop?
Senator PATTERSON (Minister for Family and Community Services and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Status of Women)
—I always say that as soon as Labor have a policy with a problem, and their child-care payment policy has a problem, they concoct a conspiracy or they scaremonger—one or the other. What you ought to be worried about, Senator Collins, is that you got rolled. Your side have been talking about a paid maternity leave scheme, and it has gone off the agenda. Where is the Labor Party's paid maternity leave scheme? Surreptitiously they got rid of that and substituted it with this baby care payment which is not fully funded.