

- Title
GREATER SUNRISE UNITISATION AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION BILL 2004
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT (GREATER SUNRISE) BILL 2004
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-03-2004
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
South Australia
- Interjector
CHAIRMAN, The
- Page
21912
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2004-03-25/0065
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES
- OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE AND OTHER CRUEL, INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT
- HUMAN RIGHTS: BURMA
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- COMMITTEES
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- KYOTO PROTOCOL RATIFICATION BILL 2003 [NO. 2]
- BUDGET
-
GREATER SUNRISE UNITISATION AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION BILL 2004
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT (GREATER SUNRISE) BILL 2004-
In Committee
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- O'Brien, Sen Kerry
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Harris, Sen Len
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Harris, Sen Len
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Harris, Sen Len
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Harris, Sen Len
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Harris, Sen Len
- McGauran, Sen Julian
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- O'Brien, Sen Kerry
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Harris, Sen Len
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Division
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Brown, Sen Bob
-
In Committee
- PRIVACY AMENDMENT BILL 2004
- DAIRY PRODUCE AMENDMENT BILL 2003
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Taxation: Compliance
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Scullion, Sen Nigel, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Resources: Investment
(Mason, Sen Brett, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Australian Defence Force: Deployment
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Environment: Ranger Uranium Mine
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Taxation: Capital Gains
(Webber, Sen Ruth, Coonan, Sen Helen)
-
Taxation: Compliance
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC SERVICE: POLITICISATION
- DOCUMENTS
- ASSENT
- COMMITTEES
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Foreign Affairs: Zimbabwe
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Social Welfare: Newstart and Youth Allowance
(Campbell, Sen George, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Environment: National Reserve System Program
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Environment: Threatened Species
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Attorney-General's Department: Criminal Justice and Security Group
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris)
-
Foreign Affairs: Zimbabwe
Page: 21912
Senator STOTT DESPOJA (10:55 AM)
—Thank you, Minister. I go again to the issue of good faith and the perception that Australia is not necessarily operating in good faith, first of all in relation to those licences. Could you let us know now, or take it on notice, what feedback the Australian government has had, if any, from the Timor Leste government on those licences?
I thank you for your answer about international law although I think it is going to be a matter for debate in this chamber. There will be different views as to whether we are fulfilling our obligations under international law in proceeding with that unilateral exploration. I ask the government this, and I can probably predict the answer from the last answer: is it not the case that we should not be issuing new licences in that area until we have a determination on the permanent boundaries? Regardless of the government's perceptions of international law obligations, shouldn't we, as part of our good faith agenda, not be issuing new licences until there is a permanent determination of the boundaries?