

- Title
NON-PROLIFERATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2003
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
28-11-2003
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
- Page
18394
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Patterson, Sen Kay
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2003-11-28/0114
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- DEFENCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2003
- COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL AMENDMENT (MEMBERS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES) BILL 2002
- ABORIGINAL LAND GRANT (JERVIS BAY TERRITORY) AMENDMENT BILL 2003
- FISHERIES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (HIGH SEAS FISHING ACTIVITIES AND OTHER MATTERS) BILL 2003
-
SPAM BILL 2003
SPAM (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2003 - BUSINESS
- FUEL QUALITY STANDARDS AMENDMENT BILL 2003
- BUSINESS
-
MEDICAL INDEMNITY AMENDMENT BILL 2003
MEDICAL INDEMNITY (IBNR INDEMNITY) CONTRIBUTION AMENDMENT BILL 2003 -
NON-PROLIFERATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2003
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Patterson, Sen Kay
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Third Reading
- BUSINESS
- MARITIME TRANSPORT SECURITY BILL 2003
- ADJOURNMENT
Page: 18394
Senator PATTERSON (Minister for Family and Community Services and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Status of Women) (1:26 PM)
—I am not a lawyer, as Senator Brown is aware, but I presume that if I were to go about interfering with the normal progress of a petrol tanker and preventing it from moving by lying down in front of it on the road there would be some law to stop me doing that. People have rights. I suspect that Senator Brown has been subject to, or is very aware of, laws whereby people do not have a right to stop the free progress of a commercial vehicle—a petrol tanker or whatever it might be. That is not the issue we are talking about in this bill. The issue we are talking about in this bill is communicating information which would prejudice the security of nuclear material or an associated item. As I said, the examples that Senator Brown is giving would fall under other legislation concerning the rights that people have to transport whatever it might be and to go about their business. But if, as subsection 26A says, the person were to communicate information to someone else that would prejudice the physical security of the material or an associated item then this bill would apply.