

- Title
SPAM BILL 2003SPAM BILL (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2003
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
27-11-2003
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
Chapman, Grant (The ACTING DEPUTY PRESIDENT)
- Page
18195
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Kemp, Sen Rod
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Miscellaneous
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2003-11-27/0083
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- DEPARTMENT OF PARLIAMENTARY SERVICES
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- PETITIONS
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- SPORT: AUSTRALIAN RUGBY UNION
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- TRADE: BANANA IMPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY HOUSING
- HEALTH: GENETICALLY ENGINEERED PRODUCTS
- HEALTH: HIV-AIDS
- MEDICARE
- NOTICES
-
STATES GRANTS (PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSISTANCE) AMENDMENT BILL 2003
SOCIAL SECURITY AMENDMENT (FURTHER SIMPLIFICATION) BILL 2003 - BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- INTERNATIONAL TAX AGREEMENTS AMENDMENT BILL 2003
- SPAM BILL 2003SPAM BILL (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2003
-
MEDICAL INDEMNITY AMENDMENT BILL 2003
MEDICAL INDEMNITY (IBNR INDEMNITY) CONTRIBUTION AMENDMENT BILL 2003 -
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Trade: Free Trade Agreement
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Immigration: Border Protection
(Scullion, Sen Nigel, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Iraq
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Industry: Textile, Clothing and Footwear
(Santoro, Sen Santo, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Iraq
(Buckland, Sen Geoffrey, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Health: Complementary Medicines
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Defence: Shipbuilding Industry
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Environment: Land Clearing
(Lees, Sen Meg, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Foreign Affairs: Afghanistan
(Stephens, Sen Ursula, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Information Technology: Internet Content
(Payne, Sen Marise, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
National Security
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Communications: Funding
(Murphy, Sen Shayne, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Foreign Affairs: Diplomatic Cables
(Mackay, Sen Sue, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Aviation: Airport Security
(Chapman, Sen Grant, Ellison, Sen Chris)
-
Trade: Free Trade Agreement
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- RECONCILIATION BILL 2001 [2002]
- BUSINESS
- MARITIME TRANSPORT SECURITY BILL 2003
- BUSINESS
-
OZONE PROTECTION AND SYNTHETIC GREENHOUSE GAS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2003
OZONE PROTECTION (LICENCE FEES—IMPORTS) AMENDMENT BILL 2003
OZONE PROTECTION (LICENCE FEES—MANUFACTURE) AMENDMENT BILL 2003- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Third Reading
-
SPAM BILL 2003SPAM BILL (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 2003
-
In Committee
- Bolkus, Nick (The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN)
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Kemp, Sen Rod
-
In Committee
- COMMITTEES
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Customs: Southern Supporter
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Health and Ageing: Aged Care Places
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Campbell, Sen Ian) -
Foreign Affairs and Trade: Institute of Public Affairs
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Defence: Anti-Vehicle Mines
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Defence: Anti-Vehicle Landmines
(Nettle, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert)
-
Customs: Southern Supporter
Page: 18195
Senator KEMP (Minister for the Arts and Sport) (12:30 PM)
—I was not going to reply, but Senator Lundy decided to somewhat gratuitously attack the government, which was rather unfair, and I do not propose to sit here and cop that. I listened very carefully to what Senator Greig said. Senator Lundy, of course, is the representative of the trade unions in this chamber. That is the nature of the Labor Party; it is the political arm of the trade union movement. Every senator that comes into this chamber is typically a trade union boss. It is not surprising that Senator Lundy would want to include trade unions in these exemptions. It is not surprising because they are the paymaster. If you are Labor senator and you get a call from the ACTU, you jump. We understand that—it is the nature of the Labor Party. The amazing thing is that Senator Greig has decided to jump with them! That is the astonishing thing, Senator Greig: these people attack your party as much as they attack my party. There is no argument in logic that trade unions should have special exemption. They have a known membership base. Basically, it is an attempt by Senator Lundy to try to look after her mates. That is fair enough, but why would the Democrats want to be part of that? It defies logic.
I listened to you very carefully, Senator Greig. You are opposed to all exemptions, but you are going to widen the exemptions. That is the logic of it. You say, `If we're going to have some exemptions, then let's widen them still further.' People may look at that. I have to say that I have thought very hard and listened very carefully to see whether I could discern a guiding principle in what you say. I am not sure I could. There is an old saying in politics, Senator Greig: `If you stand for nothing, you will fall for anything.' Essentially, that is the problem with the position that you have adopted. If it was a principled position, you would not be doing what you are doing. Your `principled' position is that there are to be no exemptions, so you have come into this chamber and you have now widened the exemptions. That is the Democrat logic. I do not agree with it.
I do not propose to delay the chamber. There was a press statement that was put out last night by my colleague the Hon. Daryl Williams, the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts. With the permission of the chamber, I would seek leave to incorporate the press statement in Hansard.
Leave granted.
The document read as follows—
OPPOSITION AND DEMOCRATS WEAK ON SPAM
26 November 2003
21/03
Tonight, the opposition and Australian Democrats have sold out the Australian community by inserting a giant loophole in the Australian Government's anti-spam bill.
They have sided with unscrupulous scammers who could not have designed a better loophole for themselves.
Under amendments passed by the Senate tonight, Australians can expect to receive spam from any company that thinks the recipient might have an interest in their products.
This removes the Government's strict requirement that the recipient must consent to receiving commercial email.
The Howard government is committed to an effective spam regime that allows consumers to take advantage of the benefits of the Internet without continual bombardment with unsolicited, intrusive and often offensive electronic messages.
It is disappointing that the opposition and the Democrats have supported amendments that let those responsible for the flood of nuisance email clogging up Australian inboxes to get around this legislation.
The government will reject these amendments in the House of Representatives for the sake of Australian consumers and our international reputation for delivering effective and responsible online regulation.
And I call on the opposition not to delay Australia's fight against spam by continuing to argue for a weakening of the legislation.