

- Title
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Centrelink: Deed of Agreement
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
13-05-2003
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
New South Wales
- Interjector
- Page
10920
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
1156
- Questioner
Nettle, Sen Kerry
- Responder
Vanstone, Sen Amanda
- Speaker
- Stage
Centrelink: Deed of Agreement
- Type
- Context
Answers to Questions on Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2003-05-13/0133
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- AUSTRALIAN PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Governor-General
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Robert (Leader of the Government in the Senate), Hill, Sen Robert) -
Iraq
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Governor-General
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Economy: Performance
(Watson, Sen John, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Governor-General
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Immigration: Detainees
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Governor-General
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Robert (Leader of the Government in the Senate)) -
Defence: Property
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert)
-
Governor-General
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Governor-General
(Mackay, Sen Sue, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Indonesia: Terrorist Attacks
(Macdonald, Sen Sandy, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Governor-General
(Kirk, Sen Linda, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Immigration: People-Trafficking
(Greig, Sen Brian, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Pan Pharmaceuticals Ltd
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Health Insurance: Medicare
(Knowles, Sen Susan, Patterson, Sen Kay)
-
Governor-General
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- COMMITTEES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- ANDERSON, MR JIM
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- DOCUMENTS
- BUDGET 2002-03
- AUSTRALIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE ORGANISATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (TERRORISM) BILL 2002 [NO.2]
-
CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (TERRORISM) BILL 2002
WHEAT MARKETING AMENDMENT BILL 2002
COMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2002
TERRORISM INSURANCE BILL 2003 - BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2003
- ASSENT
- GOVERNOR-GENERAL
- BUDGET 2003-04
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
- PROCLAMATIONS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Partnerships Against Domestic Violence
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Environment: National Reserve System Program
(Nettle, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Immigration: Falun Gong Practitioners
(Nettle, Sen Kerry, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Projects
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Veterans' Affairs: Grants
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Defence: Guided Missile Frigates
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Aviation: Operations Manual
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Education, Science and Training: Roam Consulting
(Brown, Sen Bob, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Defence: Australian Defence Force Academy
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Environment: Southport Lagoon Conservation Area
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Telecommunications: Internet Access
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Centrelink: Palm Beach Office
(Hogg, Sen John, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Centrelink: Deed of Agreement
(Nettle, Sen Kerry, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Immigration: Baxter Detention Centre
(Marshall, Sen Gavin, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Australian Defence Force Reserves
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Iraq
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Defence: Nunn Review
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Defence: Special Operations Command
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Defence: RAAF Base Edinburgh
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Gene Technology
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Gene Technology
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Veterans' Affairs: Operation Blazer
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Education: Higher Education Funding
(McLucas, Sen Jan, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Aviation: Aircraft Cabin Spraying
(Brown, Sen Bob, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Environment: Origin Energy Gas Plant
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Immigration: Self-Funded Retirees
(Brown, Sen Bob, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Customs: Fisheries Management
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Immigration: Review Tribunals
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Health and Ageing: Nursing Home Type Patients
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
National Competition Council
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Education: Higher Education
(McLucas, Sen Jan, Alston, Sen Richard) -
National Radioactive Waste Repository
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Trade: Beef Sales to Japan
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Gene Technology Information Service
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Defence: Pine Gap Joint Defence Facility
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Defence: Weapons of Mass Destruction
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Environment: FutureGen
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Environment: FutureGen
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Environment: FutureGen
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Environment: FutureGen
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Environment: FutureGen
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Tobacco Advertising Prohibition
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Environment: Seismic Surveys
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Trade: Russia
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Trade: Wheat
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Tobacco Advertising Prohibition
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Hydrogen Economy Conference
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Environment: Iraq
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Health: Hepatitis C
(Brown, Sen Bob, Patterson, Sen Kay)
-
Partnerships Against Domestic Violence
Page: 10920
Senator Nettle
asked the Minister for Family and Community Services, upon notice, on 10 February 2003:
With reference to the Deed of Agreement between Centrelink and its agents:
(1) Can the Minister specify the intended purpose of the `specified personnel' clause in the deed.
(2) Is the Minister aware that a Centrelink officer has the discretionary power to remove agency employees from the `specified personnel' list.
(3) Is there any right of appeal against a decision, made by a Centrelink officer, to remove an employee from the `specified personnel' list; if so; please specify the rights of appeal.
(4) If there is no right of appeal, can the Minister explain why a Centrelink officer has the sole discretionary power to remove Centrelink funding from agency employees.
Senator Vanstone (Minister for Family and Community Services and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Status of Women)
—The answer to the honourable senator's question is as follows:
(1) Yes. Details are as follows:
· Specified Personnel are required under the Deed to provide the services. This enables Centrelink to identify the contactors staff that will be delivering our services. The Specified Personnel are trained in the duties of a Centrelink Agent and sign a Declaration of Confidentiality that enables Centrelink staff to provide (and receive) information about customers. Centrelink staff can only provide such service to Specified Personnel so it is imperative they are named in the Deed.
· The Deed provides for discretionary removal of Specified Personnel by Centrelink (not a particular officer). This enables inappropriate Specified Personnel to be removed. Centrelink is not obliged to provide a contractor with reasons for use of this discretion (especially where Specified Personnel or customer privacy may be concerned) but would always endeavour to explain its position.
· Clause 27 of the Deed, `Dispute Resolution' provides means of resolution to resolve any disputes. Negotiation is the first means of resolution before independent mediation is recommended. If disputes are still unresolved, any party may commence court proceedings.
· The exercise of the power to remove Specified Personnel does not remove funding from the Contractor. At no time is funding provided in respect of an individual performing the services. It is provided to the Contractor who is required to nominate alternate personnel if Centrelink exercises the power to remove a particular individual as Specified Personnel. The Contractor is not required to dismiss the individual from its employ.
(2) Yes.
(3) No, however the dispute resolution clause provides a review mechanism.
(4) The question does not arise. No Centrelink officer has discretionary power to remove Centrelink funding from agency employees.