

- Title
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (FAIR DISMISSAL) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
03-03-2003
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
Western Australia
- Interjector
- Page
8830
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Campbell, Sen Ian
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2003-03-03/0024
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- REPRESENTATION OF AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
- SENATORS SWORN
- BUSINESS
- WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (FAIR DISMISSAL) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Centrelink: Family Payments
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Health: Policy
(Humphries, Sen Gary, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Centrelink: Family Payments
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Health: Tough on Drugs Strategy
(Tierney, Sen John, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Centrelink: Family Payments
(Faulkner, Sen John, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Iraq
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Centrelink: Family Payments
(Webber, Sen Ruth, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Howard Government: Policies
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Business: Executive Remuneration
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Australian Industry Development Corporation
(Brandis, Sen George, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Business: Executive Remuneration
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Medicare: Bulk-Billing
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Patterson, Sen Kay)
-
Centrelink: Family Payments
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- AUSTRALIAN LABOR PARTY
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES
- FOREIGN AFFAIRS: COLOMBIA
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- SOUTH AUSTRALIA: NATIONAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE REPOSITORY
- DOCUMENTS
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- RENEWABLE ENERGY (ELECTRICITY) AMENDMENT BILL 2002
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
-
AGRICULTURAL AND VETERINARY CHEMICALS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002
CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (REPAYMENT OF DIRECTORS' BONUSES) BILL 2002
SNOWY HYDRO CORPORATISATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002
SEX DISCRIMINATION AMENDMENT (PREGNANCY AND WORK) BILL 2002
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (PROHIBITION OF COMPULSORY UNION FEES) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
CUSTOMS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2002
AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FORESTRY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2002 -
NEW BUSINESS TAX SYSTEM (CONSOLIDATION AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL (NO. 2) 2002
NEW BUSINESS TAX SYSTEM (VENTURE CAPITAL DEFICIT TAX) BILL 2002 -
MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (CONTRIBUTORY PARENTS MIGRATION SCHEME) BILL 2002
MIGRATION (VISA APPLICATION) CHARGE AMENDMENT BILL 2002 - BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF TAXATION BILL 2002
- COMMITTEES
- WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (FAIR DISMISSAL) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
- TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (SMALL BUSINESS PROTECTION) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
- NATIONAL HEALTH AMENDMENT (PHARMACEUTICAL BENEFITS— BUDGET MEASURES) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
- PROCLAMATIONS
Page: 8830
Senator IAN CAMPBELL (Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer) (1:57 PM)
—Thank you for that clarification. That is helpful. The point that I would like to make in response is that those figures do not reveal the angst and anguish that this creates amongst thousands of businesses who know the cost and pain to the business and to all involved, the process and the length of the process, and the distraction that takes away from their businesses. For every case that goes in, there are probably many that never get there, because the employee gets a payout as a result of the threat of that—and there is an understanding of this amongst the business community.
The figure you quoted of about 50,000 was put together by the small business community. It was COSBOA, as I am informed, who did the survey. So it is not a government figure; it is a figure that was created by the small business peak body at the time. The fact is that there are thousands of small businesses who are aware of the threat and the cost involved in unfair dismissal cases and that is what creates the concern small businesses have about employing new staff. That is why I reiterate that reducing that disincentive to the employment of new staff, particularly in small businesses, will remove an impediment and should, and I believe will, have the effect of increasing employment in the small business sector.
Progress reported.