Save Search

Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
 Download Current HansardDownload Current Hansard    View Or Save XMLView/Save XML

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Wednesday, 5 February 2003
Page: 8559


Senator FAULKNER (Leader of the Opposition in the Senate) (3:06 PM) —I move:

That the Senate take note of the answers given by the Minister for Defence (Senator Hill) to questions without notice asked today relating to military action against Iraq.

We know that the Minister for Foreign Affairs, Mr Downer, in his talks with the New Zealand High Commissioner, told the high commissioner, Mrs Lackey, that he did not want the issue he was discussing—whether ships and other presence would stay in the Gulf if United Nations processes broke down—canvassed publicly. On the 7.30 Report last night, Kerry O'Brien quoted the Downer document in this form:

... and this was not a point that could be made publicly—Australia was not in a process if the UN process broke down to withdraw our ships and other presence in the Gulf.

So Kerry O'Brien asked Mr Downer, `What other presence?' Mr Downer said:

It doesn't talk about that.

But of course Mr Downer was wrong again. Unfortunately for Mr Downer, the memo says, `and other presence.' And of course this is typical of Mr Downer and it is typical of ministers in the Howard government. Either Mr Downer is trying to deliberately mislead Australians or he is a buffoon—or both.

On preparations for the war last year, Mr Downer again last night told the 7.30 Report:

The military do contingency planning ... They do contingency planning for all sorts of contingencies ... It's nothing to do with Iraq, that's their job.

He went on:

The point is that the Government hadn't sat down and considered this issue of predeployments.

That was a decision that was made on 10 January.

We know that that is complete nonsense from Mr Downer. Of course we know that Mr Downer sees himself as some sort of home-grown aristocrat. He obviously regards the rest of us as pretty dumb. He thinks that we will accept that high-level work on military engagement with Iraq was not going on throughout this period. We know that Mr Howard met President Bush in June last year. Four days after Mr Downer talked to the New Zealand High Commissioner on 28 October last year, Mr Howard and Mr Bush met in Mexico. The day after that, Senator Hill and Mr Downer were at the AUSMIN talks in Washington. This was all happening and I am sure, if it was possible, it would be at the forefront of Mr Downer's mind.

Mr Downer should have been absolutely briefed to the eyeballs on this issue. There is no doubt that the government was gearing up to go to Iraq when this conversation with the New Zealand High Commissioner happened. Senator Hill said it all when, less than a month later on 21 November, he was asked in estimates hearings by Senator Evans about ADF contingency planning, and he said:

It has not been linked to any particular UN mandate. It is very much the sort of contingency planning that militaries constantly do ... It has been designed to keep us as well informed as possible on the thinking of the US military. We believe we have been given valuable access and that it has helped keep the Australian government as informed as possible.

So planning for the deployment was well under way using US thinking, not UN thinking. Mr Downer has been so badly exposed on this. The real point here of course is that Mr Downer did not want this to become public. It is okay to talk to the New Zealand High Commissioner about these matters, but never take the Australian people into your confidence. Why not? Because that is standard operating procedure for the Howard government—cover up; never take the public into your confidence; operate in a sneaky and Nixonian way. That is Mr Downer's method. That is the Howard government's method. If you have a choice between a conspiracy and telling the truth, they will pick the conspiracy every time.