

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
Science: Funding
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
23-09-2002
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
South Australia
- Interjector
- Page
4622
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stage
Science: Funding
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2002-09-23/0047
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- MARRIAGE AMENDMENT BILL 2002
- PROCEEDS OF CRIME BILL 2002
- PROCEEDS OF CRIME (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL 2002
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Telstra: Service Charges
(Lundy, Sen Kate, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Telstra: Service Charges
(Tchen, Sen Tsebin, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Fuel: Ethanol
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Commonwealth Government: Leases
(Mason, Sen Brett, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Taxation: Collection
(Cook, Sen Peter, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
United States: Security Policy
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Business: Corporate Governance
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Health: Hepatitis C
(Harradine, Sen Brian, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Business: Corporate Governance
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Rural and Regional Australia: Drought Assistance
(Macdonald, Sen Sandy, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Business: Corporate Governance
(Wong, Sen Penny, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Science: Funding
(Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha, Alston, Sen Richard)
-
Telstra: Service Charges
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- SUPERANNUATION: COMMERCIAL NOMINEES OF AUSTRALIA LTD
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- DRUGS: EDUCATION PROGRAMS
- ENVIRONMENT: MINING WASTE DISPOSAL
-
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE) BILL 2002
CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (IMPROVING CORPORATE GOVERNANCE) BILL 2002
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (CREDIT CARD REFORM) BILL 2002 - FOREIGN AFFAIRS: INDONESIA
- ABORIGINALS AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDERS: 2001 CENSUS
- COMMITTEES
- FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (DISABILITY REFORM) BILL (NO. 2) 2002
-
EGG INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVISION BILL 2002
EGG INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVISION (TRANSITIONAL AND CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISIONS) BILL 2002
DAIRY INDUSTRY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002
ACIS ADMINISTRATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002
STATES GRANTS (PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSISTANCE) AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2002 - BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
-
PROCEEDS OF CRIME BILL 2002
PROCEEDS OF CRIME (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL 2002 -
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (GENUINE BARGAINING) BILL 2002
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (SECRET BALLOTS FOR PROTECTED ACTION) BILL 2002 - ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Tasmania: Meander Dam
(Brown, Sen Bob, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Human Rights: Hazaras
(Brown, Sen Bob, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Transport: Ocean-Going Vessels
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Agriculture: Animal Health
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Aviation: Arrivals from South Korea
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Civil Aviation Safety Authority: Listening Devices
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Minister for Agriculture Fisheries and Forestry: Visit to Japan
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Rural and Regional Australia: Farm Crime Survey
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Foot and Mouth Disease Steering Committee
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Trade: Genetically Modified Food
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Quarantine: Container Inspection
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Trade: United States Beef Quota
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Drought: Investment Allowance
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Agriculture: Farm Innovation Program
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Transport: Bass Strait Vehicle Equalisation Scheme
(Brown, Sen Bob, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Sustainable Environment Committee
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Agriculture: Organic Farming
(Brown, Sen Bob, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Indigenous Affairs: Noongar Land Council
(Harris, Sen Len, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Transport and Regional Services: Superannuation
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Macdonald, Sen Ian)
-
Tasmania: Meander Dam
Page: 4622
Senator STOTT DESPOJA (3:27 PM)
—I move:
That the Senate take note of the answer given by the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts (Senator Alston) to a question without notice asked by Senator Stott Despoja today relating to the culling of science programs.
I asked the minister in his capacity as the minister representing Minister McGauran whether it was true that this government was contemplating `culling' programs—that is the word I understand Peter McGauran used this morning at the launch of the FASTS statement of principles and policy document. FASTS is of course the Federation of Australian Scientific and Technological Societies. I wanted to get from the minister an assurance that there were some criteria in place and some openness from the government as to what the plan was. Given that Senator Alston gave a robust and strong defence of Backing Australia's Abilityin his response to me today, it was quite surprising that he professed no knowledge and no understanding of any comments made by Minister McGauran in the other place or at the policy document launch this morning—and yet this is one of the most significant contributions we have seen in recent years to Australia's research and development capacity and the promotion of innovation in Australia.
Having said that, I should acknowledge that the announcement, the innovation statement, made in January last year by this government really only restated some of the cuts that this government has made in the areas of education, science and technology. Nonetheless, it was a significant first step, a step that the Australian Democrats supported. Thus we worked with the government in order to implement the changes and the recommendations in that statement. So it is quite surprising to the sector today to hear from the Minister for Science the plan from this government to cull aspects of Backing Australia's Ability. It was somewhat more surprising to me to ask the minister representing the minister about that and have him declare no knowledge of this proposed culling.
The Australian Democrats recognise that it is appropriate to assess programs. We are not suggesting they should not be examined or analysed from time to time; of course they should be evaluated, especially when we are talking about Australian taxpayer dollars. However, what surprises me is that there has been no comment by Minister McGauran— and certainly not by Minister Alston in the chamber today—and no explanation as to what criteria there could possibly be, what time line there could possibly be, why these programs are being contemplated for culling and certainly not even a hint of recognition from Minister Alston in the chamber today that the freezing or culling of programs may not be the most innovative and promising message to be sending to our scientific and research community.
The FASTS document which is being promoted was launched today by the minister. It is a welcome contribution but once again it is a contribution to the debate that highlights how far behind Australia is lagging when it comes to R&D, particularly our investment in science. Australia spent less on gross expenditure on research and development—GERD—in 2000-01 as a percentage of GDP than it did back in 1996-97. We have dropped from 1.66 per cent of GDP in 1996-97 to 1.53 per cent in 2000-01. So the last thing I would imagine this government should be contemplating is cutting, in any financial or other sense, the programs that have been put forward as part of Backing Australia's Ability or the innovation statement. That is the precursor document if you like.
The other thing I asked the minister today, in an attempt to get some response to any questions asked, was whether or not the minister could confirm other comments made by Minister McGauran this morning in relation to the R&D Start program. As I hope many honourable senators would be aware, that has been a highly successful program for Australia, yet this government made a somewhat extraordinary decision to freeze the R&D Start program. So the Democrats have been asking this for a long time: when does the government plan to unfreeze the R&D Start program? Once again, I was not able to get an answer from Minister Alston, which suggests that he has to do a lot more work as Minister representing the Minister for Science because clearly he had no clue. However, I understand that this morning Minister McGauran suggested that the R&D Start program would be unfrozen in the first quarter of next year. All I am looking for is confirmation of that and, in the same way, the Democrats request confirmation very quickly from this government as to what it plans to do with Backing Australia's Ability. I have no doubt that it would be a great dorothy dixer for some coalition backbenchers tomorrow. They could perhaps come in, pretend everything is okay and give us an explanation as to what on earth the minister was on about today. (Time expired)
Question agreed to.