

- Title
SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (TERRORISM) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM BILL 2002
CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (SUPPRESSION OF TERRORIST BOMBINGS) BILL 2002
BORDER SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
24-06-2002
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
40
- Electorate
Queensland
- Interjector
Brown, Sen Bob
- Page
2477
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2002-06-24/0142
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (TERRORISM) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM BILL 2002
CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (SUPPRESSION OF TERRORIST BOMBINGS) BILL 2002
BORDER SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002 -
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Health: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
(West, Sen Sue, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Workplace Relations: Reform
(Barnett, Sen Guy, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Health: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
(Crowley, Sen Rosemary, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Telecommunications: Services
(Mason, Sen Brett, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Health: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
(Evans, Sen Chris, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Immigration: Asylum Seekers
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Health: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Budget: Retractable Needle and Syringe Technology
(Murphy, Sen Shayne, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Taxation: Mass Marketed Schemes
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Forestry: Tasmanian Regional Forest Agreement
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Superannuation: Contractors
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Coonan, Sen Helen) -
Lucas Heights: Nuclear Reactor
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Alston, Sen Richard)
-
Health: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- SUPERANNUATION: POLICY
- ENVIRONMENT: SHIPMENT OF NUCLEAR FUEL
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- HEALTH: ANIMAL RESEARCH
- COMMITTEES
- ADVISORY COUNCIL ON AUSTRALIAN ARCHIVES
-
APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 1) 2002-2003
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 1) 2002-2003
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 2) 2002-2003 -
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (SECRET BALLOTS FOR PROTECTED ACTION) BILL 2002
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 2002 - MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (FURTHER BORDER PROTECTION MEASURES) BILL 2002
- BUSINESS
-
SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (TERRORISM) BILL 2002 [NO. 2]
SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM BILL 2002
CRIMINAL CODE AMENDMENT (SUPPRESSION OF TERRORIST BOMBINGS) BILL 2002
BORDER SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INTERCEPTION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2002- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ray, Sen Robert
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Harris, Sen Len
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ray, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ray, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ray, Sen Robert
- Division
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Harris, Sen Len
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Harris, Sen Len
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Harris, Sen Len
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Harris, Sen Len
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Harris, Sen Len
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Brown, Sen Bob
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
- PROCLAMATIONS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Kennedy Electorate: Program Funding
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Kennedy Electorate: Program Funding
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Patterson, Sen Kay) -
Defence: Projects
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Australian Defence Force: Pensions
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Australian Defence Force: Non-Australian Applicants
(Evans, Sen Chris, Hill, Sen Robert)
-
Kennedy Electorate: Program Funding
Page: 2477
Senator LUDWIG (Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate) (8:37 PM)
—I am simply trying to help Senator Brown. As I understand it, going back to the original bill, part 5.3, terrorism, division 100.1, subparagraph 2(c) says `endangers a person's life other than the life of the person taking the action'. I do not know whether you had in mind looking at that provision, but it seems to be already in the current bill. Then, looking at the definition that the government is proposing at page 009 of the pack, page 7 of the actual amendment, and going to 2(c) at the bottom—
Senator LUDWIG
—No. While I was on my feet, I was going to go back and raise another issue. But, if you are going to move an amendment to the government's amendment, you might perhaps write it down and circulate it in the chamber so that we can see what it is. I also take you to your view of `intimidating the public or a section of the public'. I have to say it is a long bow to draw the final conclusion that you have as to the meaning of `intimidating the public or a section of the public'. The view supported by The Oxford English Dictionary would be `to frighten or overawe'. I do not know whether that definition of `intimidating' comforts the direction which you seek to take. I just do not think that definition stretches as far as you would like it to stretch.