

- Title
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT) BILL 2000
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
08-08-2001
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
Western Australia
- Interjector
- Page
25820
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Murray, Sen Andrew
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2001-08-08/0009
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT) BILL 2000
-
In Committee
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Harris, Sen Len
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
-
NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000 [2001]
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Services
(Eggleston, Sen Alan, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Commonwealth Property Holdings: Divestment
(Hogg, Sen John, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Parliamentarians: Entitlements
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Abetz, Sen Eric) -
Business Tax Reform: Small Business
(Schacht, Sen Chris, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Salmon and Trout Industry: Imports from New Zealand
(Harris, Sen Len, Alston, Sen Richard)
-
Australian Broadcasting Corporation: Services
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- PRIVILEGE
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- ENVIRONMENT: 2020 VISION FOR PLANTATIONS
- COMMITTEES
-
NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000 [2001]
-
In Committee
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- VETERANS' AFFAIRS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (2001 BUDGET MEASURES) BILL 2001
-
NEW BUSINESS TAX SYSTEM (THIN CAPITALISATION) BILL 2001
NEW BUSINESS TAX SYSTEM (DEBT AND EQUITY) BILL 2001 - BUSINESS
- SUPERANNUATION CONTRIBUTIONS TAXES AND TERMINATION PAYMENTS TAX LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2001
- SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (CHOICE OF SUPERANNUATION FUNDS) BILL 1998
-
SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION (COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT) REPEAL AND AMENDMENT BILL 1998
COMMONWEALTH SUPERANNUATION BOARD BILL 1998
SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION (COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT—SAVING AND TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL 1998
SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION (COMMONWEALTH EMPLOYMENT) REPEAL AND AMENDMENT (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1998 - DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 25820
Senator MURRAY (9:38 AM)
—by leave—I move amendments Nos 6, 7 and 8 on sheet 2000:
(6) Schedule 1, item 13, page 6 (line 32) to page 7 (line 9), omit the item, substitute:
13 At the end of subsection 170CF(2)
Add:
; and (d) if the Commission considers, having regard to all the materials before the Commission, that the application has no reasonable prospect of success, it must advise the parties accordingly.
(7) Schedule 1, item 14, page 7 (lines 15 to 17), omit paragraph (3)(b), substitute:
(b) the Commission has indicated that the applicant's claim in respect of the ground so referred has no reasonable prospect of success;
(8) Schedule 1, item 14, page 7 (lines 27 and 28), omit “a substantial prospect of being unsuccessful”, substitute “no reasonable prospect of success”.
These amendments relate to items 13 and 14 of the bill and, effectively, they substitute the words `no reasonable prospect of success' and omitting `a substantial prospect of being unsuccessful'. The intention, as those senators who recall my minority report way back when, was to ensure that both employers and employees recognise that they should enter the jurisdiction of the Industrial Relations Commission with regard to these matters only if there was a reasonable prospect of success—in other words, to omit items which, on the balance of probabilities, would be unlikely to succeed at arbitration. The effect of our proposed amendments will be to prevent an applicant from proceeding to arbitration if his or her claim in respect of harsh, unjust or unreasonable termination were to be applied where the commission would find that the application does not have a reasonable prospect of success. Before making its findings the commission would be required to give the applicant the opportunity to provide further material in support of his or her claim in respect of the grounds of harsh, unjust or unreasonable terminations. These really cover the field all the way up to item 22 of the bill.