

- Title
DAIRY PRODUCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SUPPLEMENTARY ASSISTANCE) BILL 2001
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-06-2001
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
Queensland
- Interjector
CHAIRMAN, The
Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Page
25033
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Woodley, Sen John
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2001-06-25/0132
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- DAIRY PRODUCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SUPPLEMENTARY ASSISTANCE) BILL 2001
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
High Court of Australia: Decisions
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Economy: Government Policy
(Watson, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Business Tax Reform
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Industry Development: Technology
(Lightfoot, Sen Ross, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Business Tax Reform: Survey
(Schacht, Sen Chris, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Telstra: Job Losses
(Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Business Tax Reform: Survey
(McKiernan, Sen Jim, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Medicare: Prenatal Genetic Screening
(Harradine, Sen Brian, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Business Tax Reform
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Australian Federal Police
(Payne, Sen Marise, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Business Tax Reform
(McLucas, Sen Jan, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Roads: Scoresby Freeway
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Macdonald, Sen Ian)
-
High Court of Australia: Decisions
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- PRIVILEGE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- WHALING
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- APPROPRIATION (HIH ASSISTANCE) BILL 2001
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 3) 2001
-
APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 1) 2001-2002
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 1) 2001-2002
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 2) 2001-2002 -
DAIRY PRODUCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SUPPLEMENTARY ASSISTANCE) BILL 2001
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Woodley, Sen John
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harris, Sen Len
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harris, Sen Len
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Harris, Sen Len
- Woodley, Sen John
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harris, Sen Len
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Harris, Sen Len
- Woodley, Sen John
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- PROCLAMATIONS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Treasury Portfolio: Motor Vehicles
(Cook, Sen Peter, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Minister for Forestry and Conservation: Chairmanship
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Office of Film and Literature Classification
(Greig, Sen Brian, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Supersonic Missile Launch Facility
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Drugs: Premarin
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Minchin, Sen Nick)
-
Treasury Portfolio: Motor Vehicles
Page: 25033
Senator WOODLEY (8:58 PM)
—I will make a couple of quick comments to enlighten the minister. The reason I was saying that the government might come back with a slightly different amendment was that the government committee members themselves in the Senate report came up with a fairly complicated formula to arrive at the $80,000. I thought that the government might be attracted to the idea of supporting its own members in the Senate committee along those lines. I am quite happy to put the simpler proposition that I have put in my request, which is the same as Senator Harris's request. I am quite happy to do that. I was just making an offer to the government. Senator Forshaw is not quite correct in saying that I reduced the amount from $100,000 to $80,000 because I was worried about the costs.
Senator Forshaw
—I never said that.
Senator WOODLEY
—Didn't you?
Senator Forshaw
—I said that you were able to quickly draw a line and then change it.
Senator WOODLEY
—I see. I thought it might be useful to explain how I arrived at the $100,000. I prepared the instructions for that amendment before I had the committee report. You will remember that we were doing it all in a bit of a rush last week. I was simply trying to second-guess or arrive at something near the amount the Western Australian farmers needed. I worked off Tony Ferraro's comments, but I thought: why not go with that which the government members themselves have put forward as something that the government could support? That was for a cap of $80,000. I arrived at that figure in support of those government members.
Request, as amended, not agreed to.