

- Title
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Australian Taxation Office: Instalment Activity Statement
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-06-2001
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
- Page
24974
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Kemp, Sen Rod
- Stage
Australian Taxation Office: Instalment Activity Statement
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2001-06-25/0030
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
- DAIRY PRODUCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SUPPLEMENTARY ASSISTANCE) BILL 2001
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
High Court of Australia: Decisions
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Economy: Government Policy
(Watson, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Business Tax Reform
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Industry Development: Technology
(Lightfoot, Sen Ross, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Business Tax Reform: Survey
(Schacht, Sen Chris, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Telstra: Job Losses
(Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Business Tax Reform: Survey
(McKiernan, Sen Jim, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Medicare: Prenatal Genetic Screening
(Harradine, Sen Brian, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Business Tax Reform
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Australian Federal Police
(Payne, Sen Marise, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Business Tax Reform
(McLucas, Sen Jan, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Roads: Scoresby Freeway
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Macdonald, Sen Ian)
-
High Court of Australia: Decisions
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- PRIVILEGE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- WHALING
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- APPROPRIATION (HIH ASSISTANCE) BILL 2001
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 3) 2001
-
APPROPRIATION (PARLIAMENTARY DEPARTMENTS) BILL (NO. 1) 2001-2002
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 1) 2001-2002
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 2) 2001-2002 -
DAIRY PRODUCE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SUPPLEMENTARY ASSISTANCE) BILL 2001
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Woodley, Sen John
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harris, Sen Len
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harris, Sen Len
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Harris, Sen Len
- Woodley, Sen John
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harris, Sen Len
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Harris, Sen Len
- Woodley, Sen John
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- PROCLAMATIONS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Treasury Portfolio: Motor Vehicles
(Cook, Sen Peter, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Minister for Forestry and Conservation: Chairmanship
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Office of Film and Literature Classification
(Greig, Sen Brian, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Defence: Supersonic Missile Launch Facility
(Brown, Sen Bob, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Drugs: Premarin
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Minchin, Sen Nick)
-
Treasury Portfolio: Motor Vehicles
Page: 24974
Senator KEMP (Assistant Treasurer) (3:06 PM)
—Last Thursday Senator Hutchins asked me a question in relation to PAYG. I have received some advice from the Australian Taxation Office, and I seek leave to incorporate that statement.
Leave granted.
The document read as follows—
On Thursday 21 June 2001, (ProofHansard page: 24741) Senator Hutchins asked me:
i. Is the minister aware of serious problems with the Australian Taxation Office's (ATO) administration of the new so-called simplified tax instalment activity statement?
ii. Can the minister confirm that approximately 80,000 self-funded retirees, mum and dad investors, and pensioners have received multiple letters from the A TO containing patently conflicting demands for payment?
iii. Is it true that by paying one notice over the other, even though both relate to the same period, a taxpayer risks being slugged with a significant penalty interest charge of 13.86 per cent?
iv. Is this just another aspect of this so-called new simplified tax system?
I now seek leave to have this incorporated in Hansard.
i. I am not aware of any serious problems with the ATO's administration of the simplified instalment activity statement. However, I am aware of some issues arising from the overlap of pay as you go (PAYG) annual instalments and the lodgement of income tax returns.
ii. The taxpayers who are affected are those who did not lodge their 1999-2000 returns until after they were notified of their annual PAYG instalment in April 2001. When their 1999-2000 returns were lodged, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) advised them of a new liability based on the more current information in the 1999-2000 return.
iii. The Commissioner of Taxation has stated that the general interest charge will not be imposed if the taxpayer pays the wrong amount by paying one notice instead of another.
The vast majority of taxpayers in this situation use tax agents. The ATO has contacted tax agents over the past few weeks to ensure that they are aware of the situation and what is required.
iv. The Commissioner has indicated that this is a transitional problem. When the annual PAYG instalment payment date is moved to October, this will not be an issue as all income tax returns should have been lodged well before that time.