

- Title
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (TALLIES AND PICNIC DAYS) BILL 2000
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
01-03-2001
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
Victoria
- Interjector
- Page
22294
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2001-03-01/0045
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY: NOEL BUTLIN ARCHIVES
- LAKE EYRE BASIN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BILL 2001
- FORMULA ONE GRAND PRIX
- TEXTILE, CLOTHING AND FOOTWEAR STRATEGIC INVESTMENT PROGRAM
- NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENCE SYSTEM
- SUPERANNUATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (POST-RETIREMENT COMMUTATIONS) BILL 2000
- NATIONAL CRIME AUTHORITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000 [2001]
- BROADCASTING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000 [2001]
-
WORKPLACE RELATIONS AMENDMENT (TALLIES AND PICNIC DAYS) BILL 2000
-
In Committee
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Ludwig, Sen Joe
- Division
- Collins, Sen Jacinta
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS
- COMMUNICATIONS AND THE ARTS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL CODE) BILL 2000
- LAW AND JUSTICE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL CODE) BILL 2000 [2001]
- COMMUNICATIONS AND THE ARTS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL CODE) BILL 2000
- ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER COMMISSION AMENDMENT BILL 2000
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Goods and Services Tax: Advertising
(McLucas, Sen Jan, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Fuel Prices
(Crane, Sen Winston, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Textile, Clothing and Footwear Industry: Bradmill Undare Group
(Campbell, Sen George, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Rural and Regional Australia: Initiatives
(Lightfoot, Sen Ross, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(Bolkus, Sen Nick, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Dairy Industry: Deregulation
(Woodley, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Tax Reform: Trusts
(Ludwig, Sen Joe, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Child Care Benefits
(Payne, Sen Marise, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Minister for Sport and Tourism
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert)
-
Goods and Services Tax: Advertising
- STANDING ORDER 203 (INFRINGEMENT OF ORDER)
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS
- COMMITTEES
- CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 4) 2000
-
EXCISE TARIFF AMENDMENT (PETROL TAX CUT) BILL 2001
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT (PETROL TAX CUT) BILL 2001 - DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 22294
Senator JACINTA COLLINS (10:17 AM)
—In this matter, I can at this stage foreshadow that the Labor Party have circulated amendments to the amendments we understand the Australian Democrats will be moving. Let me firstly deal with the issue of picnic days. The Labor Party, whilst expressing the opinion that we would have preferred to oppose this bill outright, can accept the intention of the Democrats to excise the picnic days provisions from what ultimately might survive in this bill. We support those Democrat amendments, which have been foreshadowed through their circulation in the chamber, in removing references in the bill that relate to picnic days. The Democrats are essentially trying to make the best of an otherwise bad lot.
As I canvassed in my speech in the second reading debate, the removal of picnic days from allowable award matters is essentially a petty and vindictive ideological act rather than a substantive policy achievement by this government. It has no saving graces whatsoever. From the evidence we have received, it would simply add confusion and unnecessary work and it would pointlessly waste the resources of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission and the industrial parties. I might now give Senator Murray the opportunity to deal with the Democrat amendments with respect to tallies. I will then foreshadow the Labor Party's proposed amendments to the amendments circulated by the Democrats on tallies.