

- Title
INDIRECT TAX LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
26-06-2000
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
Tasmania
- Interjector
CHAIRMAN, The
Kemp, Sen Rod
Murphy, Sen Shayne
- Page
15623
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Brown, Sen Bob
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2000-06-26/0148
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- CHILDERS BACKPACKER TRAGEDY
- INDIRECT TAX LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Goods and Services Tax: Diesel Fuel
(Tierney, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Goods and Services Tax: Petrol Prices
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Conroy, Senator Stephen, Kemp, Sen Rod, Kemp, Senator Rod) -
Research and Development: Business Investment
(Lees, Sen Meg, Lees, Senator Meg, Kemp, Sen Rod, Kemp, Senator Rod) -
Goods and Services Tax: Petrol Prices
(Faulkner, Sen John, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Families: United Nations Proposals
(Harradine, Sen Brian, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Goods and Services Tax: Price Increases
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Tax Reform: Information Campaign
(Coonan, Sen Helen, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Goods and Services Tax: Tollways
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Social Welfare: Policy
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Goods and Services Tax: Local Government
(Ray, Sen Robert, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Rural and Regional Australia: Rural Communities Grants Programme
(Knowles, Sen Susan, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Goods and Services Tax: Real Estate Commissions
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Organised Crime: People Smuggling
(Mason, Sen Brett, Vanstone, Sen Amanda)
-
Goods and Services Tax: Diesel Fuel
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- CENTENARY OF FEDERATION: JOINT SITTING
- PRIVILEGE
- NOTICES
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- BUDGET 1999-2000
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- SOCIAL SECURITY AND VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS) BILL 2000
- FINANCIAL SECTOR LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 1) 2000
- A NEW TAX SYSTEM (TAX ADMINISTRATION) BILL (NO. 2) 2000
- COMMITTEES
-
INDIRECT TAX LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000
-
In Committee
- Murphy, Sen Shayne
- Sherry, Sen Nick
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Murphy, Sen Shayne
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Division
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Murphy, Sen Shayne
- Cook, Sen Peter
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Kemp, Sen Rod
-
In Committee
- CORPORATIONS LAW AMENDMENT (EMPLOYEE ENTITLEMENTS) BILL 2000
- NEW BUSINESS TAX SYSTEM (MISCELLANEOUS) BILL 1999
- DIESEL AND ALTERNATIVE FUELS GRANTS SCHEME AMENDMENT BILL 2000
-
ADJOURNMENT
- Conroy, Senator Stephen: Behaviour
- Postal Delivery Officers' Union: Mr Quentin Cook
-
Dusseldorp Skills Forum: Work for the Dole
Human Genome Project: United States of America - Conroy, Senator Stephen: Behaviour
- Kingsford Smith Airport: Safety Issues
- Parliamentary Delegation to Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands
- Commonwealth Parliamentary Association: Delegation to Trinidad and Tobago
-
Parliamentary Behaviour
Pine Gap—Treaties Committee Report: Government Response
- DOCUMENTS
- PROCLAMATIONS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Attorney-General's Department: Assistance to Gippsland Electorate
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Department of Health and Aged Care: Contracts with Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
(Ray, Sen Robert, Herron, Sen John) -
Department of Health and Aged Care: Contracts with PricewaterhouseCoopers
(Ray, Sen Robert, Herron, Sen John) -
Department of Health and Aged Care: Contracts with KPMG
(Ray, Sen Robert, Herron, Sen John) -
Department of Health and Aged Care: Contracts with Arthur Andersen
(Ray, Sen Robert, Herron, Sen John) -
National Crime Authority: Matters Referred
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Prime Minister and Cabinet Portfolio: Agency Boards
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business Portfolio: Agency Boards
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Multi-Peril Crop Insurance: Research Progress
(Woodley, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Genetically Modified Trees
(Brown, Sen Bob, Herron, Sen John)
-
Attorney-General's Department: Assistance to Gippsland Electorate
Page: 15623
Senator BROWN (7:49 PM)
—The minister is not on top of the tax office rulings. The tax office ruling released today says that there will be a GST where a potato farmer stops growing potatoes in return for a government grant.
Senator Kemp
—That is a condition.
Senator BROWN
—But, in answer to my question on notice, the same minister said that, if a dairy farmer stops milking cows and gets a grant in return for doing that, it will not be subject to the GST.
Senator Murphy
—Are you saying that that is not a condition?
Senator BROWN
—Yes, Senator Murphy, through you, Mr Temporary Chairman. The minister is saying that not milking cows is not a condition but that not growing potatoes is a condition. The cases are exactly analogous, and we have totally different rulings on them. I want to ask the minister explicitly whether he can give a commitment from the gov-ernment that no grant to community groups or organisations will be lessened bymeans of a GST being levied. The minister said, `No. Where there are grants going to community organisations where the GST applies, the grants will be increased to cover the GST, because the GST will be returned to the government.' On the facts of it, that is logical. I am concerned that there will be community groups who will not get their grants increased by an amount that covers the GST because they do not have the favour of government. I want to make sure that the minister is absolutely right and can be held to a government commitment that there will not be any selectivity in this matter and that, without exception, community groups will not be out of pocket because the GST is levied on grants.