

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Veterans: Home Care
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
10-05-2000
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
South Australia
- Interjector
- Page
14296
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Schacht, Sen Chris
- Responder
Ellison, Sen Chris
- Speaker
- Stage
Veterans: Home Care
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/2000-05-10/0080
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY ZONE
-
TRANSPORT AND TERRITORIES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1999
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Mackay, Sen Sue
- Macdonald, Senator Ian
- Mackay, Sen Sue
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Mackay, Sen Sue
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Mackay, Sen Sue
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Greig, Sen Brian
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Macdonald, Senator Ian
- Harradine, Sen Brian
-
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (FRINGE BENEFITS) BILL 2000
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (MEDICARE LEVY SURCHARGE—FRINGE BENEFITS) AMENDMENT BILL 2000-
In Committee
- CHAIRMAN, The
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Woodley, Sen John
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Woodley, Sen John
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Kemp, Sen Rod
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- CENTENARY OF FEDERATION: JOINT SITTING
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Department of Finance and Administration: Litigation
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Budget 2000-01: Living Standards
(Lightfoot, Sen Ross, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Budget 2000-01: Income Tax
(Cook, Sen Peter, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Rural and Regional Australia: Services
(Eggleston, Sen Alan, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Public Hospitals: Funding
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Herron, Sen John) -
Environment: Funding
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Foreign Aid: Target
(Hogg, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard)
-
Department of Finance and Administration: Litigation
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Bowel Cancer Screening: Funding
(Harris, Senator Len, Herron, Senator John) -
Hearing Services Program: Funding
(Denman, Senator Kay, Denman, Sen Kay, Herron, Senator John, Herron, Sen John) -
Budget 2000-01: Income Tax
(Tchen, Sen Tsebin, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Veterans: Home Care
(Schacht, Sen Chris, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Budget 2000-01: Unemployment Projections
(Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha, Kemp, Sen Rod)
-
Bowel Cancer Screening: Funding
- DOCUMENTS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- NOTICES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- KEYS, SIR WILLIAM
- COMMITTEES
- HEALTH LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (GAP COVER SCHEMES) BILL 2000
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 11) 1999
- NOTICES
- BILL RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- JURISDICTION OF COURTS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 2000
- COMMITTEES
-
CORPORATIONS LAW AMENDMENT (EMPLOYEE ENTITLEMENTS) BILL 2000
-
In Committee
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Chapman, Sen Grant
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Campbell, Sen Ian
- Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Adoption of Report
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- A NEW TAX SYSTEM (TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT) BILL 2000
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Australian Defence Force: Same Sex Next of Kin
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
East Timor: Peacekeeping Allowances to Military Personnel
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Defence: SES Officers
(Faulkner, Sen John, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Transport and Regional Services: Provision of Income and Expenditure Statements
(Faulkner, Sen John, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Department of Defence: Provision of Income and Expenditure Statements
(Faulkner, Sen John, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs: Provision of Income and Expenditure Statements
(Faulkner, Sen John, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Goods and Services Tax: Department of Defence Research
(Faulkner, Sen John, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Transport and Regional Services: Contracts with PricewaterhouseCoopers
(Ray, Sen Robert, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Department of Transport and Regional Services: Contracts with KPMG
(Ray, Sen Robert, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Sexually Explicit Material
(Greig, Sen Brian, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Coastwatch
(Schacht, Sen Chris, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Romania: Cyanide Spill
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert)
-
Australian Defence Force: Same Sex Next of Kin
Page: 14296
Senator SCHACHT (2:53 PM)
—My question is addressed to Senator Ellison representing the Minister for Veterans' Affairs. Can the minister give details of why the Department of Veterans' Affairs was dissatisfied with the quality of care provided to veterans by the Department of Health and Aged Care under the home care program, which has now led to home care for veterans being transferred from the Department of Health and Aged Care to the Department of Veterans' Affairs? Further, can the minister explain how the Department of Veterans' Affairs can provide an improved home care service to veterans, when the Department of Veterans' Affairs is required to provide savings of $57 million over four years in providing this home care service?
Senator ELLISON (Special Minister of State)
—Through the Veterans' Home Care program, the department will now provide a wide range of home care services to the veteran community on similar terms to those currently provided under the Home and Community Care program. This in no way has anything to do with the ability of the department of health to administer that program. This is a great initiative; it is a great expansion of services to veterans. Senator Schacht is trying to beat up this issue and trying to say that it is dissatisfaction with the department of health when, in fact, it is a great initiative; it is an expansion of services to veterans in this country. Such things as home help, personal care, garden maintenance and other services will be available to veterans who are assessed as needing such services to enable them to live independently. This new program will commence from 1 January this year. It will offer targeted support aimed at improving and maintaining the health and wellbeing of veterans. Who better to deliver this to the veterans of Australia than the Department of Veterans' Affairs? What we are doing is expanding what is available to those veterans. This is good news for veterans in Australia.
Senator SCHACHT
—Madam President, I ask a supplementary question. First of all, Minister, I think you are reading the wrong program; you are reading about the extension of the program. But I ask you, Minister—and you may have to take this on notice to get it checked—is it true that the savings of $57 million will be achieved by reducing the number of bed days presently used by veterans? Therefore, Minister, can you inform the Senate of how many bed days will have to be saved and how many veterans will not be admitted to hospital to achieve the savings of $57 million required by the government?
Senator ELLISON (Special Minister of State)
—Senator Schacht is really struggling with this. We have announced great initiatives for veterans in this budget, including Vietnam veterans. Senator Schacht knows full well that we are increasing expenditure for veterans in this budget, and his scare tactics will not confuse or fool them. They will know that this is a good budget for veterans.