Senator COOK (11:11 AM) —I do not follow the explanation fully. I know it is tedious, but could it be explained again? Is Senator Bartlett suggesting that amendments (16) to (19) are consistent with what he sought to be carried yesterday and are required to be carried now in order to give better meaning to the amendments adopted yesterday? As we progress through the sheet, will Senator Bartlett indicate where he thinks supplementary or additional amendments should be made and where he thinks supplementary or additional amendments are redundant? I just need this for guidance, so that I know what I am being called upon to respond to.