

- Title
CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (ESTABLISHMENT OF REPUBLIC) 1999
Consideration of House of Representatives Message
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
12-08-1999
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
- Interjector
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
- Page
7425
- Party
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
- Stage
Consideration of House of Representatives Message
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1999-08-12/0177
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- INDIGENOUS AUSTRALIANS
- COMMITTEES
- NUCLEAR WEAPONS: COMPUTERISED CONTROL SYSTEMS
- BUSINESS
- CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY: APPOINTMENT OF MR LAURIE FOLEY
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND TRAINING AMENDMENT BILL 1999
- CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (PREAMBLE) 1999
- ABORIGINAL LAND RIGHTS (NORTHERN TERRITORY) AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1999
- TRADESMEN'S RIGHTS REGULATION REPEAL BILL 1999
- NAVIGATION AMENDMENT (EMPLOYMENT OF SEAFARERS) BILL 1998
- CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (ESTABLISHMENT OF REPUBLIC) 1999
- BUSINESS
- CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (PREAMBLE) 1999
- BUSINESS
- ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER COMMISSION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1999
- CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (PREAMBLE) 1999
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
States: Commonwealth Funding
(Quirke, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Economy: Government Policies
(Parer, Sen Warwick, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Diesel Fuel: Excise Reduction
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Manufacturing Sector: Outlook
(Crane, Sen Winston, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Aged Care: Income Tested Fees
(Evans, Sen Chris, Herron, Sen John) -
Australian Defence Force: Minimum Age for Hostilities
(Bourne, Sen Vicki, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Pituitary Hormone Injections: Compensation
(Crowley, Sen Rosemary, Herron, Sen John) -
Indigenous Australians: Government Policies
(Ferris, Sen Jeannie, Herron, Sen John) -
Health Insurance: Pre-existing Ailments
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Herron, Sen John) -
Drugs: Education
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Genetically Modified Food
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Herron, Sen John) -
Tasmania: National Sea Highway
(Harradine, Sen Brian, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
National Business Management College
(Carr, Sen Kim, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Child Care: Funding
(Knowles, Sen Susan, Newman, Sen Jocelyn)
-
States: Commonwealth Funding
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- CONDOLENCES
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- NOTICES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- BUSINESS
- DOCUMENTS
-
CUSTOMS AMENDMENT (WAREHOUSES) BILL 1999
IMPORT PROCESSING CHARGES AMENDMENT (WAREHOUSES) BILL 1999 - AUSTRALIA NEW ZEALAND FOOD AUTHORITY AMENDMENT BILL 1999
- COMMITTEES
- ABORIGINAL LAND RIGHTS (NORTHERN TERRITORY) AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1999
- SUPERANNUATION CONTRIBUTIONS AND TERMINATION PAYMENTS TAXES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1999
- CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (ESTABLISHMENT OF REPUBLIC) 1999
-
CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (PREAMBLE) 1999
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Ridgeway, Sen Aden
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Division
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ridgeway, Sen Aden
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Third Reading
- NATIONAL LIBRARY OF AUSTRALIA
- COMMITTEES
- CUSTOMS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1999
- CUSTOMS AMENDMENT (TEMPORARY IMPORTATION) BILL 1999
- DAMAGE BY AIRCRAFT BILL 1999
- AUSTRALIAN SPORTS COMMISSION AMENDMENT BILL 1999
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Roads: Albury Bypass Project
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Agreements
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Tasmanian Regional Forest Agreement: Deep Red Myrtle
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Shipping: Cabotage
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Shipping: Voyage Permits for Foreign Vessels
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Shipping: Inspection of Foreign Vessels
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Shipping: Australian Coastal Tonnage Carried by Foreign Vessels
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Shipping: Level of Investment in Australian Fleet
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Shipping: Operating Costs of Australian and Foreign Vessels
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Shipping: Contribution to National Gross Domestic Product
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Marine Incident Investigation Unit
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian)
-
Roads: Albury Bypass Project
Page: 7425
Message received from House of Representatives returning the Constitution Alteration (Establishment of Republic) 1999 and requesting the reconsideration of the bill in respect of the amendments disagreed to by the House.
House of Representatives message—
Schedule of the amendments made to which the House of Representatives disagrees:
(1) Title, page 1 (lines 13 to 16), omit "with the Queen and Governor-General being replaced by a President appointed by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Commonwealth Parliament ".
(3) Schedule 1, item 3, page 4 (line 30), at the end of the paragraph, add "or until the expiration of thirty days after the end of the term, whichever first occurs".
Statement of reasons for disagreement with certain proposed amendments:
Senate Amendment Number 3
Amendment 3 would limit the extension of an incumbent President's term under proposed section 60 of the Constitution to 30 days.
Section 60 was intended to cover the possibility that a new appointment would not be finalised before the end of the incumbent's term.
This reflects the reality of the appointment process—it is not a process which can necessarily be regulated by means of strict schedules and deadlines.
Section 60 should allow for the continuation of the incumbent President, who would previously have been appointed with the support of both the Prime Minister and the leader of the Opposition, beyond 30 days.
This is a better option than the more cumbersome acting arrangements contemplated by recommendation 3.
The arrangements contemplated in amendment 3 would be unnecessarily cumbersome in the case of a short extension.
Further, it would be inappropriate to rely on a State Governor to act in the event that circumstances should force a longer extension—for example if it proved impossible to find a mutually agreed nominee.
For these reasons, the House of Representatives opposes recommendation 3.
Senate Amendment Number 1
Amendment 1 relates to the long title of the Bill, which will of course form the basis of the question.
That title as passed by the House of Representatives indicates both the nature of the change to a republic—to replace the Queen and Governor-General with a President and the proposed method of appointment.
It distinguishes the proposed model from other proposed models.
The wording suggested in the amendment gives no indication of the particular republic model or the nature of change.
It does nothing to help voters to identify clearly what they are voting on.
Research clearly shows there is a need to provide that help and to dispel misconceptions.
For these reasons, the House of Representatives opposes amendment 1.
Motion (by Senator Ellison) proposed:
That the message be considered in committee of the whole immediately.
The DEPUTY PRESIDENT
—Before we proceed to that, there is a statement that I would like to make on behalf of Madam President.
Before the Senate proceeds to consider the message from the House of Representatives disagreeing to amendments made by the Senate, there is a matter to which I should refer. I point out to the Senate that, if the committee of the whole agrees to a motion that it not insist on an amendment to which the House has disagreed, the motion for the Senate to adopt the report of the committee will need to be agreed to by an absolute majority of the Senate. If that condition is not met, the bill as agreed to by both houses will not have been finally passed by an absolute majority of the Senate as required by section 128 of the Constitution. This principle was enunciated by a ruling of President Baker in 1906 in relation to amendments by the House to a Constitution alteration bill initiated in the Senate, and the principle is applicable to this situation.
If the Senate's decision is not to insist on an amendment, therefore, the names of senators voting for that decision in the Senate will be recorded, as for the third reading of the bill, to ensure that the bill without the amendment has been agreed to by an absolute majority.
Question resolved in the affirmative.