- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Telecommunications: Competition
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
10-08-1999
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
QLD
- Interjector
BISHOP
- Page
7102
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Mason, Sen Brett
- Responder
Alston, Sen Richard
- Speaker
- Stage
Telecommunications: Competition
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1999-08-10/0006
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Foreign Debt: Level
(Campbell, Sen George, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Economy: Growth
(Tchen, Sen Tsebin, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Trade: Deficit
(Cook, Sen Peter, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Telecommunications: Competition
(Mason, Sen Brett, Alston, Sen Richard) -
East Timor: Australian Defence Forces
(Hogg, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
National Competition Council: Payments to Queensland
(Woodley, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Department of Defence: Secretary
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Nuclear Waste: Shipping
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Department of Defence: Secretary
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Disability Services: Unmet Needs
(Knowles, Sen Susan, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Civil Aviation Safety Authority: Appointment of Mr Laurie Foley
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Antibiotics: Resistance
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Herron, Sen John) -
Goods and Services Tax: Small Business Compensation
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Kemp, Sen Rod)
-
Foreign Debt: Level
- PARLIAMENTARY LANGUAGE
- TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEES
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- ROADS: GEELONG ROAD
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- BUDGET 1998-99
- ENVIRONMENT AND HERITAGE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1999
- COMMITTEES
- CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (ESTABLISHMENT OF REPUBLIC) 1999
- FIRST SPEECH
- CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (ESTABLISHMENT OF REPUBLIC) 1999
- PARLIAMENT HOUSE: GAS LEAK
-
CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (ESTABLISHMENT OF REPUBLIC) 1999
-
Second Reading
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Lundy, Sen Kate
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Cooney, Sen Barney
- Lightfoot, Sen Phillip
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Abetz, Sen Eric
- Hutchins, Sen Steve
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Coonan, Sen Helen
- Hogg, Sen John
- Quirke, Sen John
- Ferguson, Sen Alan
- Ellison, Sen Chris
-
Second Reading
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Community Based Long Day Care
(Evans, Sen Chris, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Outside School Hours Care
(Evans, Sen Chris, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Australian Defence Forces: Depleted Uranium Armaments
(Brown, Sen Bob, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Veterans' Affairs: Grants to the Electorate of Bass
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Family and Community Services: Freedom of Information Requests
(Ray, Sen Robert, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Family and Community Services: Comcare Claims
(Ray, Sen Robert, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Family and Community Services: Information Technology Outsourcing
(Ray, Sen Robert, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Family and Community Services: Questions on Notice
(Ray, Sen Robert, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Family and Community Services: Australian National Audit Office Report
(Ray, Sen Robert, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Department of Family and Community Services: Australian National Audit Office Report
(Ray, Sen Robert, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
East Timor: Armed Indonesian Police
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Kemp, Sen Rod)
-
Community Based Long Day Care
Page: 7102
Senator MASON
—My question is to the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Senator Alston. Will the minister inform the Senate of any recent breakthroughs in telecommunications laws and regulations, and what will these break
throughs mean for Australian families and businesses as they use telephone services?
Senator ALSTON (Communications, Information Technology and the Arts)
—Senator Mason is off to a very good start indeed, because that is a key question.
Opposition senators interjecting—
Senator ALSTON
—I know it is something you lot have not the slightest interest in pursuing, but the fact is that competition has been the main game in telecommunications in recent years. Since 1 July 1997, we have had 28 new carrier licences issued, and of course that is very good news for consumers. It has meant, for example, that international calls have fallen by something like 60 per cent over the last three years since we have been in government and long-distance domestic calls have fallen by between 40 and 70 per cent. That is a tremendous amount of progress.
Senator Mark Bishop
—Are domestic calls now coming down?
Senator ALSTON
—I know you are not interested in competition; about the only competition you are interested in is competitive branch stacking, and I know you have raised that to an art form in recent times. It is going very well, it is consuming all of that policy making time that you should be setting aside. We are more concerned to ensure that the competitive regime is improved to the maximum extent. The recent raft of legislation that accompanied the further Telstra privatisation does just that because it tightens the competition notice regime. It makes it easier for people to get access to the system. They can approach the courts in their own private capacity rather than through the ACCC. In a raft of ways, the ACCC will have the capacity to ensure that negotiations take place at an earlier point in time. They will be able to attend and mediate and access negotiations without being prevented from undertaking further arbitration. These are all very powerful tools to drive further competition.
We have also had a historic decision in relation to local calls. For the first time, the last bastion of Telstra's monopoly services has been opened up in such a way that the regime will never be the same again. We did give them a bit of an indication of our thinking, because we went to the last election promising that we would do just that if the ACCC were not so minded. In the event, I think they agreed with us that it was very timely, and I have no doubt that all of the other carriers in the business will be very supportive of the regime as well. We expect there will be some technical and operational delays but I do not see that they should take any more than a matter of months and certainly not the two years that I have seen suggested in the media. Opening up services like ADSL, again, is critically important.
In addition to those initiatives, we have had the setting of the implementation date for local call rates, free phone number portability and we have a new facilities access code. I should advise the Senate that the government is not going to proceed to have Senator Schacht declared a low impact facility: we now think that is abundantly self-evident! But, as Senator Hill pointed out, there are a number of other candidates and I would have thought that Senators Carr, Cook and Bolkus, who is not even here, would be prime candidates. We will be taking a close look at whether we need to take any further regulatory action in the interests of competition for consumers, because we think that all of those voters out there ought to have two decent teams in action. At the moment, it is a very unfair contest with the A side playing the B minus.
We will certainly continue to push the policy agenda. It is only a shame that the other side do not seem to take it seriously. I see your leader is out on a listening tour—a magical mystery tour, presumably. He went to an employment seminar, stayed for five minutes, delivered a paper and went home. If that is the sort of leadership being demonstrated, you can see it is going to be a very cold winter for the Labor Party over the next few years. All I can suggest is that the listening tour, if you are really serious about it, will tell you that there is a bit going out on there. It is called number crunching. Ask Mr Crean and Mr Ferguson and you will get a flavour of what the alternative is. (Time expired)

