

- Title
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Unfair Dismissals
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
10-12-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
- Page
1789
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
10
- Questioner
Murray, Sen Andrew
- Responder
Alston, Sen Richard
- Speaker
- Stage
Unfair Dismissals
- Type
- Context
Answers to Questions on Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-12-10/0383
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
-
BUSINESS
-
Drugs: Young People
Drugs: Abuse - National Competition Policy
- Jabiluka and Ranger Uranium Mines
-
United Nations International Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People
Australian Pensioners and Superannuants Federation
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Government Business
-
Colston, Senator
Community Education and Information Program - Internet: Framework Legislation
- Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee
- Days and Hours of Meeting and Routine of Business
- Civil Aviation Regulations (Amendment)
-
Drugs: Young People
- UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
- EAST TIMOR: DEATHS OF AUSTRALIAN-BASED JOURNALISTS
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
-
DRUGS: USE AND ABUSE
ALCOHOL: CONSUMPTION BY YOUNG PEOPLE
DRUGS: USE BY YOUNG PEOPLE
TOBACCO: SMOKING PREVENTION PROGRAMS
DRUGS: USE BY YOUNG PEOPLE - EAST TIMOR: DEATHS OF AUSTRALIAN-BASED JOURNALISTS
- WESTERN AUSTRALIA REGIONAL FOREST AGREEMENT
- BUSINESS
- TASMANIA REGIONAL FOREST AGREEMENT
- CORPORATE LAW ECONOMIC REFORM PROGRAM BILL 1998
- DUSSELDORP SKILLS FORUM
- GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
- COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIAN POSTGRADUATE ASSOCIATIONS
- ENVIRONMENTAL REFORM (CONSEQUENTIAL PROVISIONS) BILL 1998
- ADDITIONAL PETITION
- COMMITTEES
- CORPORATE LAW ECONOMIC REFORM PROGRAM BILL 1998
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- REGIONAL FOREST AGREEMENTS BILL 1998
-
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES BILL 1998
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES AMENDMENT BILL 1998
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE) BILL 1998 -
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (LICENCE CHARGES) BILL 1998 - AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1998
- ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES CONVENTION BILL 1998
- ACTS INTERPRETATION AMENDMENT BILL 1998
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Members of Parliament Staff
(Campbell, Sen George, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Indigenous Australians
(Payne, Sen Marise, Herron, Sen John) -
Centrelink: Staff Surveillance
(Bishop, Sen Mark, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Drugs: Education
(Coonan, Sen Helen, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Child Support Agency: Staff Identification
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Human Rights: National Action Plan
(Bourne, Sen Vicki, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Status of Women
(Crowley, Sen Rosemary, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
West Papua: Massacre
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Goods and Services Tax: Self-funded Retirees
(Faulkner, Sen John, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Tasmanian Sea Mounts Marine Reserve
(Gibson, Sen Brian, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Private Health Insurance: Rebate
(Evans, Sen Chris, Herron, Sen John) -
Taxation Reform: Environment
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Hill, Sen Robert)
-
Members of Parliament Staff
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- COMMITTEES
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- COMMITTEES
- ASSENT TO LAWS
- BUSINESS
- ACTS INTERPRETATION AMENDMENT BILL 1998
-
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES BILL 1998
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES AMENDMENT BILL 1998
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE) BILL 1998 -
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (LICENCE CHARGES) BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1998-
In Committee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Division
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Division
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- COMMITTEES
-
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES BILL 1998
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES AMENDMENT BILL 1998
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE) BILL 1998 - PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
-
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES BILL 1998
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES AMENDMENT BILL 1998
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE) BILL 1998-
In Committee
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Ray, Sen Robert
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Crowley, Sen Rosemary
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Crowley, Sen Rosemary
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Crowley, Sen Rosemary
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Crowley, Sen Rosemary
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Knowles, Sen Susan
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Knowles, Sen Susan
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Division
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- West, Sen Sue
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- West, Sen Sue
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- West, Sen Sue
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Faulkner, Sen John
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- West, Sen Sue
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- West, Sen Sue
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Lees, Sen Meg
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- COMMITTEES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- COMMITTEES
-
ABORIGINAL LAND RIGHTS (NORTHERN TERRITORY) AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1998
AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL TRAINING AUTHORITY AMENDMENT BILL 1998 -
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (GOODS AND SERVICES TAX) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (GOODS AND SERVICES TAX IMPOSITION—EXCISE) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (GOODS AND SERVICES TAX IMPOSITION—CUSTOMS) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (GOODS AND SERVICES TAX IMPOSITION—GENERAL) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ADMINISTRATION) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (GOODS AND SERVICES TAX TRANSITION) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (FRINGE BENEFITS REPORTING) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (MEDICARE LEVY SURCHARGE—FRINGE BENEFITS) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS NUMBER) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS NUMBER CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1998 -
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (END OF SALES TAX) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (PERSONAL INCOME TAX CUTS) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (COMPENSATION MEASURES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (BONUSES FOR OLDER AUSTRALIANS) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (INCOME TAX LAWS AMENDMENT) BILL 1998
A NEW TAX SYSTEM (AGED CARE COMPENSATION MEASURES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT) BILL 1998 - ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1789
Senator Murray
asked the Minister representing the Minister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business, upon notice, on 10 November 1998:
(1) With reference to unfair dismissal claims under federal law, the annual report for 1996-97 of the Industrial Relations Court of Australia highlighted major outcomes in the federal jurisdiction as follows: (a) 74 per cent of unfair dismissal claims cases were settled by agreement; (b) 75 per cent of cases were finalised within 6 months and 99 per cent within 12 months; (c) 62 per cent of trials were completed in one day and 84 per cent within 2 days; (d) 58 per cent of contested cases were decided in favour of the employee, with 42 per cent in favour of the employer; (e) reinstatement of the employee was ordered in 7.5 per cent of contested cases; and (f) the median amount of compensation awarded was approximately $6 000:
Can comparable information on unfair dismissal claims for the 1997-98 financial year be provided for the following jurisdictions: (a) Federal; (b) New South Wales; (c) Queensland; (d) South Australia; (e) Tasmania; and (f) Western Australia.
(2) With reference to the Council of Small Business Organisations of Australia's guess that 50 000 jobs would be created by exempting small business employers employing 15 or fewer employees from federal unfair dismissal laws: (a) how many of the estimated 50 000 jobs will be created in each state and territory; and (b) can the methodology and empirical data used to arrive at the jobs estimate creation in each jurisdiction be provided.
(3) With reference to the answer to paragraph (1) of question on notice no. 1005 (Senate Hansard, 4 March 1998, p.421), for each of the jurisdictions outlined in the table provided, can numbers be given, accompanied by evidence and methodology for: (a) jobs created or lost as a result of increases or decreases in unfair dismissal applications; and (b) separate answers for federal, state and territory jurisdictions based on comparative 1996-97 data.
Senator Alston (Communications, Information Technology and the Arts)
—The Minister for Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's question:
(1) Answers for each of the five State unfair dismissal regimes are unavailable.
The 1997-8 Annual Report of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission contains some statistics in relation to resolution of unfair dismissal claims. However, the Australian Industrial Registry does not collect data on all of the subjects on which the Industrial Relations Court of Australia previously collected data. Therefore, statistics in relation to federal unfair dismissal claims can only be provided for parts (a), (d) and (e).
(a) There were 8,092 termination of employment applications lodged under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 in 1997-98. Of those applications, 6,303 (78 per cent) were settled by agreement (ie had been withdrawn, settled or otherwise discontinued prior to conciliation or settled at conciliation or withdrawn, discontinued or otherwise settled after conciliation but prior to final orders).
(d) There were 774 contested federal cases decided in 1997-98, with 311 (40 per cent) decided in favour of the employer and 463 (60 per cent) in favour of the employee. (It may be noted that 282 of the decisions in favour of the employee involved applications against Gordonstone Coal Management based on the same fact situation; if these 282 applications are treated as one class action, then 63 per cent of contested cases would have been decided in favour of the employer and 37 per cent in favour of the employee.)
(e) Reinstatement was awarded in only 17 (2 per cent) of the 774 contested federal cases.
(2) The Chief Executive of the Council of Small Business Organisations Australia, Mr Rob Bastian, based his estimate that 50 000 jobs would be created if small businesses were exempt from federal unfair dismissal laws on the, in his view conservative, premise that 1 in 20 small businesses would hire at least one more employee if the exclusion was to come into force.
Applying this formula to the percentage of small businesses in each State or Territory (according to data published in Small Business in Australia 1997, ABS Cat No. 1321.0), approximately 16 500 jobs would be created in NSW, 12 500 in VIC, 9 500 in QLD, 4 000 in SA, 5 500 in WA, 1 000 in TAS and 500 each in the ACT and NT.
(3) Figures for the number of jobs created in each State and Territory in 1996 and 1997 (trend series annual averages) are as follows. (Source: ABS Labour Force Survey.)
NSW | VIC | QLD | SA | WA | TAS | NT | ACT | AUST | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1996 | `000 | 36.9 | 32.0 | 26.5 | 5.3 | 10.4 | 1.0 | 1.9 | -1.9 | 112.5 |
% | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 2.3 | -1.2 | 1.4 | |
1997 | `000 | 13.4 | 17.5 | 31.9 | 2.9 | 19.3 | -6.8 | 1.9 | 1.6 | 80.7 |
% | 0.5 | 0.8 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 2.3 | -3.4 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
There are a number of factors that contribute to the differences in labour market performance across the States and Territories. For example, the States and Territories generally rely on different industries for economic and employment growth. As such, any changes in policy or economic conditions which affect sectors in a non-uniform manner can be expected to have different impacts on employment. Similarly, characteristics such as population size and growth, natural attributes and climatic conditions also contribute to the differences in employment growth.
The reduction in the number of unfair dismissal applications indicates that progress has been made under the current legislation in discouraging inappropriate applications. This in itself would not be expected to create additional jobs in the small business sector. The Government considers that further change is required to recognise the particular circumstances of small businesses as well as to provide greater certainty for employers about the length of an employee's employment before that person can initiate an unfair dismissal application (no change is proposed in respect of unlawful dismissal applications). It is necessary to provide security for employers that they will not be subject to inappropriate applications. This is provided for in the Workplace Relations Amendment (Unfair Dismissals) Bill 1998, presently before the Parliament.