

- Title
AGED CARE AMENDMENT (ACCREDITATION AGENCY) BILL 1998
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
02-12-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
QLD
- Interjector
- Page
1056
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Woodley, Sen John
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-12-02/0034
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (JUDICIAL REVIEW) BILL 1998
- BUSINESS
- NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION MEASURES (IMPLEMENTATION) BILL 1998
-
AGED CARE AMENDMENT (ACCREDITATION AGENCY) BILL 1998
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Woodley, Sen John
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Woodley, Sen John
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Woodley, Sen John
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Woodley, Sen John
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Woodley, Sen John
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Tambling, Sen Grant
- Third Reading
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Economy: Growth
(Gibson, Sen Brian, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Banking: Fees and Charges
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Economy: Growth
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Goods and Services Tax: Public Housing Rents
(Reynolds, Sen Margaret, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Centrelink: Interview Review Forms
(Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Goods and Services Tax: Regional Australia
(Mackay, Sen Sue, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Jabiluka Uranium Mine
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert)
-
Economy: Growth
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Goods and Services Tax: Credit Unions
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Jabiluka Uranium Mine
(Crane, Sen Winston, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Goods and Services Tax: Level
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Taxation: Contractors
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Taxation: Electronic Commerce
(Lundy, Sen Kate, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Telecommunications: Competition Reforms
(Watson, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard)
-
Goods and Services Tax: Credit Unions
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- MILLENNIUM BUG: COMPLIANCE PROGRESS REPORTS
- SEXUALITY DISCRIMINATION
- INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: SELF-DETERMINATION
- GOODS AND SERVICES TAX: PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- GOODS AND SERVICES TAX: PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- PAYMENT PROCESSING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SOCIAL SECURITY AND VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS) BILL 1998
- NOTICES
-
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (LICENCE CHARGES) BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1998 - WOOL INTERNATIONAL AMENDMENT BILL 1998
-
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION MEASURES (IMPLEMENTATION) BILL 1998
-
In Committee
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Macdonald, Sen Ian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Allison, Sen Lyn
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Hill, Sen Robert
- Brown, Sen Bob
-
In Committee
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1056
Senator WOODLEY (12:14 PM)
—I want to be fully informed in this debate. Although we have indicated our support for the legislation, the Democrats are always interested in the debate and want to respond to it. I am still trying to work out the opposition's position on this. I felt it was
probably a philosophical position to do with their opposition to any user-pays charges whatsoever and their belief that the Commonwealth should pay all the costs of the aged care industry.
I am not sure if that is so, or if the opposition's proposal to vote against the bill is much more narrow and is to do with their concern about the level of fees. A lot was made in various speeches about the effect on small and rural and remote areas—and some assurances have been given by the government about that.
I am trying to work out from the opposition whether they have a broad philosophical opposition to the whole principle of any contribution from the people who are benefiting from aged care assistance, or whether it is more narrow. Are they simply worried that the level of fees may be too high? Could we get clarification on that from the opposition?