

- Title
SPACE ACTIVITIES BILL 1998
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
30-11-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
SA
- Interjector
CHAIRMAN
- Page
830
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-11-30/0027
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- BUSINESS
-
SPACE ACTIVITIES BILL 1998
-
In Committee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
-
In Committee
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Jabiluka Uranium Mine
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Economy: Growth
(Knowles, Sen Susan, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Private Health Insurance: Membership
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Unemployment: Job Growth
(Brownhill, Sen David, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Private Health Insurance: Premiums
(Evans, Sen Chris, Herron, Sen John) -
Jabiluka Uranium Mine
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Private Health Insurance: Industry Profits
(West, Sen Sue, Herron, Sen John) -
West Papua: Civil Protests
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Private Health Insurance: Rebate
(Ray, Sen Robert, Herron, Sen John) -
Australian Wool Research and Promotion Organisation: Push Polling
(Woodley, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Genetically Engineered Food
(Gibbs, Sen Brenda, Herron, Sen John) -
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders: Small Businesses
(Eggleston, Sen Alan, Herron, Sen John) -
Executive Salaries
(Campbell, Sen George, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Regional Australia: Services
(Tierney, Sen John, Macdonald, Sen Ian)
-
Jabiluka Uranium Mine
- SENATORS: READING OF SPEECHES
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- NOTICES
-
BUSINESS
- Finance and Public Administration References Committee
- National Competition Policy
- Goods and Services Tax: Production of Documents
- Sexuality Discrimination
-
Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education References Committee
Pork Industry: Imports - Telstra: Hobart Work Management Centre
- Millennium Bug: Compliance Progress Reports
- COMMITTEES
- GENE TECHNOLOGIES
- KAKADU NATIONAL PARK: WORLD HERITAGE LISTING
- CALABY, MR JOHN HENRY
- INTERNET: REGULATION
- JABILUKA URANIUM MINE
- CREERY WETLANDS
- BUSINESS
- INTERNET: REGULATION
- BUSINESS
- CENTRELINK: JOB NETWORK
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- ASSOCIATION OF FORMER MEMBERS OF THE PARLIAMENT OF AUSTRALIA
- COMMITTEES
- DELEGATION REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
-
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES BILL 1998
PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE INCENTIVES AMENDMENT BILL 1998
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE) BILL 1998
ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES CONVENTION BILL 1998
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (NO. 2) 1998 - COMMITTEES
-
TELSTRA (TRANSITION TO FULL PRIVATE OWNERSHIP) BILL 1998
TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1998
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (UNIVERSAL SERVICE LEVY) AMENDMENT BILL 1998
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CONSUMER PROTECTION AND SERVICE STANDARDS) BILL 1998
NRS LEVY IMPOSITION AMENDMENT BILL 1998 - ACTS INTERPRETATION AMENDMENT BILL 1998
-
SPACE ACTIVITIES BILL 1998
-
In Committee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Schacht, Sen Chris
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- CHILD SUPPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1998
-
FILM LICENSED INVESTMENT COMPANY BILL 1998
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (FILM LICENSED INVESTMENT COMPANY) BILL 1998 - MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1998
- NOTICES
- GOVERNOR-GENERAL'S SPEECH
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 830
Senator MINCHIN (Industry, Science and Resources) (1:32 PM)
—In general terms, it does distress me to see parties on the left arguing so vociferously about government legislation. But in this case—again, for the reasons so well put by Senator Schacht—we are opposed to these amendments, particularly in relation to military purposes, for the reasons set out by Senator Schacht. To say that the condition applies to every launch permit that it cannot be issued if there is any possibility of it being used for any military purpose would mean huge definitional problems.
I do not know, but the Australian Defence Force may well, for the defence of Australia—which I would have thought we are all interested in—and for national security reasons want to use a commercial launch to put up a defensive satellite of some kind. It may be the military that actually commissions the launch for purposes that relate to the security of every single one of us and for the defence of Australia. To put this clause in means that could never ever occur—that would be completely and utterly prohibited. So there is a question there about national security. There is also the verification issue that I think Senator Schacht very sensibly raised. There are a whole lot of reasons this clause would be a ridiculous limitation on the regime.
As we have said before, the minister can only grant the permit if he is satisfied that there is no risk of substantial harm to public safety and it does not contain weapons of mass destruction. We think there are enough protections in the system as it is. If it appears that a problem is emerging, there may well, as Senator Schacht has said, be a need for the parliament to reconsider the regime. But we see no purpose in these amendments, particularly that amendment in relation to `any military purpose'. It may be that anything relating to communication satellites, global positioning systems and things like that would get caught up in that and severely hinder the development of the space industry in this country for no purpose, particularly given, as I say, there are adequate safeguards already in the legislation to ward against any reasonable risks associated with the emergence of a space industry.