

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Adoption: Bilateral Agreement with China
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
24-11-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
TAS
- Interjector
- Page
491
- Party
IND
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Harradine, Sen Brian
- Responder
Hill, Sen Robert
- Speaker
- Stage
Adoption: Bilateral Agreement with China
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-11-24/0014
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Millennium Bug: Government Documents
(Lundy, Sen Kate, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Taxation Reform: Business
(Gibson, Sen Brian, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Knowles, Senator Sue: Alleged Death Threats
(Cook, Sen Peter, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Private Health Insurance: Rebate
(Lightfoot, Sen Phillip, Herron, Sen John) -
Australian Federal Police: Funding
(Bolkus, Sen Nick, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Banking: Fees and Charges
(Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Fraud
(Denman, Sen Kay, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Australian Federal Police: Theft of Drugs and Money
(Coonan, Sen Helen, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Telstra Sale: Expenditure
(Crowley, Sen Rosemary, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
East Timor
(Bourne, Sen Vicki, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Administrative Appeals Tribunal: Proposed Changes
(McKiernan, Sen James, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Adoption: Bilateral Agreement with China
(Harradine, Sen Brian, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Legal Aid: Funding
(Cooney, Sen Barney, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Taxation Reform: Small Business
(Chapman, Sen Grant, Alston, Sen Richard)
-
Millennium Bug: Government Documents
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- CONSTITUTION ALTERATION (RIGHT TO STAND FOR PARLIAMENT—QUALIFICATION OF MEMBERS AND CANDIDATES) BILL 1998
- GREENHOUSE GASES
- FITZROY DAM
- KEW COTTAGES, VICTORIA
- BUSINESS
- DOCUMENTS
- BUSINESS
-
HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING AMENDMENT BILL 1998
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Crossin, Sen Trish
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- Ellison, Sen Chris
- Carr, Sen Kim
- COMMITTEES
- COMMITTEES
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
Page: 491
Senator HARRADINE
—My question is to the Leader of the Government in the Senate. Minister, you will remember that despite the procrastination by the Victorian Department of Human Services we were ultimately able to get for the first time an Australia-China intercountry adoption agreement. Could the minister advise the Senate when the agreement between Australia and the PRC in respect of adoption will come into action.
Senator HILL (Environment and Heritage)
—I recognise, again, Senator Harradine's interest in this very important matter and that it has been a struggle to progress. Nevertheless, real progress does seem to be being made at present and I think Senator Harradine in his question was recognising the amendments we made at the Commonwealth level to facilitate a bilateral agreement between China and the appropriate state which will set the standard for Austral
ian adoptions from China. That bilateral agreement is being negotiated, as Senator Harradine knows, by the State of Victoria. That was pursuant to a resolution of the Community Services Ministerial Council. I understand the negotiation is progressing and is expected to be finalised in the first half of next year.
Recent changes to China's adoption law, as reported in some Australian newspapers—I noticed it in the Age—will not affect the need for a formal agreement between China and Australia before Australians can adopt children from China. When the agreement is in place, the adoption, which will always take place in China, will be recognised in Australia. On entry to Australia these children will not come under the I(GOC) Act and there will be no need for the parents to seek further recognition of the adoption through an Australian court. Migration regulations have been amended to facilitate adoptions under the proposed bilateral agreement with China, as I said. They will come into force from the date the agreement comes into force. It has been a long time coming but it looks now as if the matter should be concluded within the next six months.
Senator HARRADINE
—Madam President, I ask a supplementary question. There are thousands of children desperately needing adoptive parents and there are many people in Australia wanting to adopt. Is the minister aware the Department of Human Services in Victoria is quoting a cost of $17,000 for each adoption, including $8,000 charged by the federal government for immigration fees and court costs? Aren't these costs rather prohibitive?
Senator HILL (Environment and Heritage)
—I am not aware of that. They do sound to me to be somewhat prohibitive and I will speak to Mr Ruddock about it, in particular about the $8,000 fee which Senator Harradine has referred to as a Commonwealth charge.