

- Title
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Goods and Services Tax: Implementation
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
23-11-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
39
- Electorate
TAS
- Interjector
CONROY
- Page
387
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Gibson, Sen Brian
- Stage
Goods and Services Tax: Implementation
- Type
- Context
Questions Without Notice
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-11-23/0034
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- CHILD SUPPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1998
- EDUCATION SERVICES FOR OVERSEAS STUDENTS (REGISTRATION OF PROVIDERS AND FINANCIAL REGULATION) AMENDMENT BILL 1998 (NO. 2)
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Goods and Services Tax: Profiteering
(Sherry, Sen Nick, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Private Health Insurance: Rebate
(Payne, Sen Marise, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Goods and Services Tax: Banking Services
(Hutchins, Sen Steve, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Economy: Growth
(Parer, Sen Warwick, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Goods and Services Tax: Books
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Industry: Government Policy
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Minchin, Sen Nick) -
Goods and Services Tax: Sale of Farm Businesses
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
West Papua: Massacre
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Goods and Services Tax: Public Housing Rents
(Evans, Sen Chris, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Telstra: Privatisation
(Tierney, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Goods and Services Tax: First Home Owners Scheme
(Cook, Sen Peter, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Education: Teacher Shortages
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Superannuation: Revenue Collection Shortfall
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Kemp, Sen Rod)
-
Goods and Services Tax: Profiteering
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- NOTICES
- BUSINESS
- WOOL INTERNATIONAL AMENDMENT BILL 1998
- GENETIC PRIVACY AND NON-DISCRIMINATION BILL 1998
- BUSINESS
- SEXUALITY DISCRIMINATION
- MATTERS OF URGENCY
- DOCUMENTS
- COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF AUSTRALIA
-
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (LICENCE CHARGES) BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1998
STATES GRANTS (PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSISTANCE) AMENDMENT BILL 1998
STATES GRANTS (GENERAL PURPOSES) AMENDMENT BILL 1998
HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING AMENDMENT BILL 1998 -
FILM LICENSED INVESTMENT COMPANY BILL 1998
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT (FILM LICENSED INVESTMENT COMPANY) BILL 1998
WOOL INTERNATIONAL AMENDMENT BILL 1998 -
CHILD SUPPORT LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1998
-
In Committee
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Woodley, Sen John
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Woodley, Sen John
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Woodley, Sen John
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Woodley, Sen John
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Woodley, Sen John
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Woodley, Sen John
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Woodley, Sen John
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Woodley, Sen John
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Evans, Sen Chris
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Division
- Procedural Text
-
In Committee
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (STRENGTHENING OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO CHARACTER AND CONDUCT) BILL 1998
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Air Traffic Controllers
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Air Traffic Services Enterprise Based Agreement
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Airservices Australia
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Macdonald, Sen Ian) -
Local Government Development Program: Victoria
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Department of Workplace Relations and Small Business: Conference Expenditure
(Faulkner, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Department of Veterans' Affairs: Conference Expenditure
(Faulkner, Sen John, Newman, Sen Jocelyn)
-
Air Traffic Controllers
Page: 387
Senator GIBSON (3:17 PM)
—The Labor Party are against tax reform. That is the fact of the matter. In the last election, the Labor Party campaigned against tax reform. They said that the current system in Australia is fair and reasonable. That is what they said. That is what they told the Australian community. We said to the Australian community that we recognise, as everyone in the Australian community recognises, that the tax system in Australia is definitely broken. Everyone in Australia knows this. They know that the wholesale sales tax system is a mess.
Senator Conroy
—Rubbish!
Senator GIBSON
—It is rubbish, is it? There is no wholesale sales tax on a Lear jet, but ordinary folk pay wholesale sales tax at 22 per cent on motor cars. What is fair about that? It is well known that the wholesale sales tax system is a mess. We want to get rid of FIDs and BADs. The Labor Party wants to keep them. They are a disincentive to jobs in the finance industry in Australia. The Labor Party wants to keep stamp duties on financial transactions; we are planning to get rid of them as part of our overall package. They
want to keep them as an imposition on businesses.
Worse than that, without the total tax reform package, how can we get rid of the problem of the disincentive for people on low incomes to work, to do extra work and to save? Through our tax reform package, we are reducing the marginal tax rates for the great bulk of Australian wage and salary earners—that is those with an annual income of between $20,000 and $50,000; and average earnings in Australia are about $38,000 a year—and to reduce their marginal tax rates to 30 per cent so they have a real incentive to work and to save.
In addition to that, we are reducing the taper rates for various government payments—pensions, et cetera—to make sure that people who are poor and are in receipt of government benefits get away from the marginal tax rates of over 100 per cent that they are currently paying. It is no wonder that some people do not want to work and do not want to save.
We published a 200-page document on our plan for tax reform before we went to the Australian people. The people voted for us to stay in government. They want tax reform because they recognise that the tax reform package will provide a fairer system for everybody. It will provide an incentive for people to work and to save—which is what we want, particularly for younger people—and it will also provide stronger economic growth for everybody.
Independent experts have predicted that the positive economic growth resulting from the tax package will range from one per cent to three per cent. These are not Treasury figures; this is what outside experts have predicted. As a consequence of that, there will be higher incomes for everyone and an increase in the number of jobs. The minimum estimate of increased job numbers is of the order of 200,000 simply from the implementation of the tax reform package in the next four or five years. The reforms are very important for Australia. All Australians understand that the reforms are important. Yet today the Labor Party is nitpicking about minute details, even before the legislation has been tabled—and this legislation will be tabled in the near future.
We have set out the strategy of what needs to be done in adequate detail in the 200-page document—more than anyone else has ever done before. What detail did you put out in 1993 when you increased the total tax take of the Commonwealth government by 30 per cent? You did not pay compensation to people who were worse off. This is a great package for the Australian people. The Australian people recognised that and voted for us to go ahead with it. (Time expired)