

- Title
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Freedom of Information: Ministers' Travel Costs
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
09-07-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
SA
- Interjector
- Page
5351
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stage
Freedom of Information: Ministers' Travel Costs
- Type
- Context
Miscellaneous
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-07-09/0102
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
WHEAT MARKETING LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1998
-
In Committee
- Woodley, Sen John
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- O'Brien, Sen Kerry
- Woodley, Sen John
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- Woodley, Sen John
- Woodley, Sen John
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- O'Brien, Sen Kerry
- Murray, Sen Andrew
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- O'Brien, Sen Kerry
- Woodley, Sen John
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Woodley, Sen John
- O'Brien, Sen Kerry
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Forshaw, Sen Michael
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- O'Brien, Sen Kerry
- Woodley, Sen John
- Troeth, Sen Judith
- O'Brien, Sen Kerry
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWS AMENDMENT BILL 1998
- GAS PIPELINES ACCESS (COMMONWEALTH) BILL 1998
- PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 3) 1997
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Centrelink
(Murphy, Sen Shayne, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Mr Paul Keating: Piggery
(Ferris, Sen Jeannie, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Youth Allowance
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Mr Paul Keating: Piggery
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Telstra
(Faulkner, Sen John, Parer, Sen Warwick) -
Electoral: Bogus How-To-Vote Cards
(Murray, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Telstra
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
National Competition Policy
(Margetts, Sen Dee, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Ministerial Staff and Consultants
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Regional Mobile Phone Network
(Ferguson, Sen Alan, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Child Care
(Neal, Sen Belinda, Herron, Sen John) -
Research and Development Expenditure: Bankruptcies
(Lees, Sen Meg, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Privacy
(Cooney, Sen Barney, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Mr Christopher Skase
(Calvert, Sen Paul, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Job Network
(West, Sen Sue, Ellison, Sen Chris)
-
Centrelink
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AND ENERGY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 3) 1997
- COPYRIGHT AMENDMENT BILL 1997
- DAYS AND HOURS OF MEETING AND ROUTINE OF BUSINESS
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- TELSTRA (TRANSITION TO FULL PRIVATE OWNERSHIP) BILL 1998
Page: 5351
Senator MINCHIN (Special Minister of State;Minister Assisting the Prime Minister)
—On Wednesday 8 July, Senator Ray asked me a supplementary question without notice regarding the release of information under the Freedom of Information Act. Senator Ray's question was specifically in relation to the release of information under the act in regard to the Kennedy report. I will now read the reply.
As Senator Ray should know, due process for a response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act to the Department of Finance and Administration is a matter for the department, not the minister. Due process was followed in this matter, and I was neither consulted on nor advised of the department's decision or the reasons for it.
I am advised that the department's response to the freedom of information request included details of the process which applicants may follow should they be dissatisfied with the department's decision; that they may seek internal review of the decision within 30 days of receiving it; and, if still not satisfied following internal review, they may apply to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for review of the original decision. I am also advised that these review rights were not exercised in this case, but I am sure that the department would give due consideration to a late request for review.