

- Title
SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (YOUTH ALLOWANCE CONSEQUENTIAL AND RELATED MEASURES) BILL 1998
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-05-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
NEAL
- Page
2984
- Party
G(WA)
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Margetts, Sen Dee
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-05-25/0187
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
-
SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (YOUTH ALLOWANCE CONSEQUENTIAL AND RELATED MEASURES) BILL 1998
-
In Committee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- West, Sen Sue
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- West, Sen Sue
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- West, Sen Sue
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Division
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Newman, Sen Jocelyn
- Neal, Sen Belinda
- Bartlett, Sen Andrew
- Margetts, Sen Dee
-
In Committee
- SCHOOLS CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Private Health Insurance
(Reynolds, Sen Margaret, Herron, Sen John) -
Aboriginal Affairs
(Eggleston, Sen Alan, Herron, Sen John) -
Health
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Herron, Sen John) -
Mr Christopher Skase
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Vanstone, Sen Amanda) -
Centrelink
(Collins, Sen Jacinta, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Dugong Sanctuaries
(Woodley, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Employment National
(Mackay, Sen Sue, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Managed Investment Funds
(Harradine, Sen Brian, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Coal Industry
(Faulkner, Sen John, Parer, Sen Warwick) -
Compact Disc Imports
(Coonan, Sen Helen, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Pork Industry
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Parer, Sen Warwick) -
Acid Sulfate Soils
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Australian Dollar: Devaluation
(Quirke, Sen John, Kemp, Sen Rod)
-
Private Health Insurance
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- WATERFRONT REFORM
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
-
NOTICES OF MOTION
- Government Business
- Regulations and Ordinances Committee
- Introduction of Legislation
- Regulations and Ordinances Committee
- Jabiluka Uranium Mine
- Indonesia
- Community Affairs Legislation Committee
- General Practioners
- East Timor
- Telstra
- Jabiluka Uranium Mine
- Telstra
- Australasian Police Ministers' Council
- Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee: Joint
- Telstra
- Irish-Australian Parliamentary Friendship Group
- Indonesia
- Medical Research
- Agricultural Research
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- HUMAN RIGHTS
- NORTHERN IRELAND PEACE AGREEMENT
- COMMITTEES
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- CATTLE BRANDING
- PORK INDUSTRY
- BUDGET 1998-99
- NATIONAL ARCHIVES
- BUDGET 1998-99
- BUDGET 1997-98
- COMMITTEES
-
INTERSTATE ROAD TRANSPORT AMENDMENT BILL 1998
INTERSTATE ROAD TRANSPORT CHARGE AMENDMENT BILL 1998 -
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (LICENCE CHARGES) BILL 1998
AUSTRALIAN RADIATION PROTECTION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1998 - SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (YOUTH ALLOWANCE CONSEQUENTIAL AND RELATED MEASURES) BILL 1998
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 3) 1998
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- PROCLAMATIONS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Fringe Benefits Tax
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Sydney 2000 Olympics: Taxation
(Watson, Sen John, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Pundulmurra and Hedland Colleges: Amalgamation
(Stott Despoja, Sen Natasha, Ellison, Sen Chris) -
Motor Vehicle Industry: Environmental Strategy
(Allison, Sen Lyn, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Waterfront
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Waterfront
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Child Care
(Neal, Sen Belinda, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Salmon Industry in Tasmania
(Brown, Sen Bob, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Search and Rescue Training
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Alston, Sen Richard) -
National Landcare Program
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Parer, Sen Warwick) -
Department of Defence: Qualitative and Quantitative Research
(Ray, Sen Robert, Newman, Sen Jocelyn) -
Northern Prawn Fishery
(O'Brien, Sen Kerry, Parer, Sen Warwick) -
Aged Care
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Herron, Sen John)
-
Fringe Benefits Tax
Page: 2984
Senator MARGETTS (4:23 PM)
—I think the issue really is about the existing policies of parties—not whether or not they are going to promise something at elections—in this case the major parties in this chamber, the dinosaur parties. It is about what they actually say and whether or not such policies say that they are in favour of hiving off a particular group of people and making their conditions such that it is harder for them to achieve equity than others. That is what we come down to. It is not a matter of revealing in advance; we are talking about a situation where we are being asked to vote, now, on basic equity principles in relation to rent assistance. The issues are absolutely current. Those people who are involved need not to find out whether or not parties like the Labor Party may think about becoming fair and equitable in the future but whether or not they are operating as if they are an equitable party now. If they are not now, what makes anybody think that they would change their mind in the future?
The issue, as Senator Neal has suggested, is that it would cost too much.
Senator Neal
—I didn't ever say that.
Senator MARGETTS
—Senator Neal has indicated that it is all right for the minor parties to say this but they are the party in waiting to be government and therefore they cannot simply make—what was the terminology?—ad hoc decisions outside of the context of their entire package. What are they saying?
Are they saying they are not going to try to hive off money to fund a glitzy tax giveaway? Or are they actually going make up for some of the inequities that have existed in the education system over the last few years? That is not very obvious here.
It is not a matter of ad hoc decisions, it is about whether or not you can suggest that a party who may not be operating along a line of principles now will suddenly become principled, supposedly leading up to an election, or whether or not what we are being told is intended to take the pressure off now because afterwards it will be too late. We will not know later but of course, at the moment, when we are being asked to make a decision, we are being told that it is the wrong time, the wrong question, out of context, ad hoc—let us find another excuse. That is what we are left with today.