

- Title
NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 1997 [No. 2]
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
06-04-1998
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
SA
- Interjector
- Page
2041
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Minchin, Sen Nick
- Stage
In Committee
- Type
- Context
Bills
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1998-04-06/0021
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 1997 [No. 2]
-
In Committee
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Woodley, Sen John
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
-
In Committee
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Employment
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Telstra: Privatisation
(Mackay, Sen Sue, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Renewable Energy
(Macdonald, Sen Sandy, Parer, Sen Warwick) -
Crown Casino: Mr Geoffrey Cousins
(Carr, Sen Kim, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Port Hinchinbrook Development
(Bartlett, Sen Andrew, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Health Funding
(Forshaw, Sen Michael, Herron, Sen John) -
Intercountry Adoption Program
(Harradine, Sen Brian, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Dividend Streaming
(Conroy, Sen Stephen, Kemp, Sen Rod) -
Native Title
(Tierney, Sen John, Alston, Sen Richard) -
Prime Minister: Code of Conduct
(Faulkner, Sen John, Hill, Sen Robert) -
Private Health Insurance
(Lees, Sen Meg, Herron, Sen John)
-
Employment
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
-
NOTICES OF MOTION
- Wik People
- Superannuation Committee
- Employment, Education and Training Legislation Committee: Questions on Notice
- Superannuation Committee
- Ministerial Guidelines
- Jabiluka Uranium Mine
- Redbank Power Project
- Community Affairs References Committee
- Women: Breastfeeding
- Battle of the Bands Competition
- Logging and Woodchipping
- Central Coast: Planet Earth 2000 Project
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- INDONESIA
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- ISRAEL
- BUDGET 1997-98
- COMMITTEES
- AGED CARE AMENDMENT BILL 1998
- BUDGET 1997-98
- COMMITTEES
- ASIA PACIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM: SEOUL, JANUARY 1998
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 7) 1997
- COMMITTEES
- ASSENT TO LAWS
-
NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 1997 [No. 2]
-
In Committee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Woodley, Sen John
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Woodley, Sen John
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Woodley, Sen John
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Woodley, Sen John
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Division
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Woodley, Sen John
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Harradine, Sen Brian
- Brown, Sen Bob
- Woodley, Sen John
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Division
- Procedural Text
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Woodley, Sen John
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Minchin, Sen Nick
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
- Boswell, Sen Ronald
- Margetts, Sen Dee
- Bolkus, Sen Nick
-
In Committee
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 2041
Senator MINCHIN (Special Minister of State;Minister Assisting the Prime Minister) (1:31 PM)
—The question suggests that the government would withdraw the bill. The government is not withdrawing the bill. The government has put this bill to the Senate and it wants the Senate to pass the bill in the form presented to the Senate. Obviously, we should and will debate the amendments that have been put and see what form the bill comes out of the Senate in. It will then go to the House of Representatives for the House of Representatives to consider its reaction to the bill. We hope and intend that there will be a full debate on this bill and that we will pass the bill—albeit, as it would appear, with some amendments which the government may not be able to accept in the House of Representatives.
In response to Senator Woodley in relation to the RDA, I can only deal with amendments as presented by other parties to the bill as presented by the government. The amendments presented to the government on the RDA are, for the reasons I have outlined, not able to be supported by the government. I have repeatedly said on behalf of the government that, in relation to the whole bill, we are not in a position to compromise it or reduce its workability but any propositions on any issues which meet government policy, are workable and practical will obviously be considered by us.
The government has put in 99 amendments to this bill which attempt to meet some of the concerns raised by the Senate last time and which meet them in a way that we think clarifies the operation of the act, improves the act, and meets some of the misunderstandings that were raised in the last Senate debate. That is an act of good faith on our part. It shows our reasonableness in the way we wish the bill to be dealt with.
Throughout this debate, we will continue to treat all proposed amendments on their merits and consider them against the criteria—which I am bound to apply as the representative of the government—of whether or not they are consistent with government policy, practical and workable. Amendments put before the government in relation to the RDA do not meet those criteria.