Save Search

Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
   View Or Save XMLView/Save XML

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Wednesday, 4 March 1998
Page: 421


Senator Murray asked the Minister representing the Minister for Workplace Relations and Small Business, upon notice, on 26 November 1997:

(1) With reference to an answer to a question on notice asked during the 1997-98 Budget Supplementary Estimates hearings of the Economics Legislation Committee concerning the Industrial Relations portfolio, subprogram 1.2—Legal and Industry:

Can a comparison of the industrial relations systems' nine unfair dismissal jurisdictions in 1997 as compared to 1996 be provided at the earliest date following 31 December 1997.

(2) At the earliest date following 31 December 1997, could details of research undertaken on the number and percentage of unfair dismissal applications which apply to small businesses with less than 15 employees, compared with total unfair dismissal applications for 1997, in all nine unfair dismissal jurisdictions be provided.


Senator Alston (Communications, the Information Economy and the Arts) —The Minister for Workplace Relations and Small Business has provided the following answer to the honourable senator's questions:

(1) A comparison of unfair dismissal applications in all jurisdictions in 1997 as compared to 1996 is as follows.

State/Territory

January-December 1996 1

January-December 1997 1

Combined 1997 figures as % of

Federal

State

Combined

Federal

State

Combined

combined 1996 figures 1

New South Wales

4,290

2,186

6,476

1,115

4,558

5,673

88%

South Australia

633

1,240

1,873

273

1,384 2

1,6572

88%

Queensland

512

1,932

2,444

623

1,932

2,555

105%

Western Australia

1,875

918

2,793

271

1,824

2,095

75%

Tasmania 3

360

1143

474

117

3693

486

103%

Victoria 4

5,958

358

6,316

4,527

NA4

4,527

72%

ACT 4

509

NA4

509

260

NA4

260

51%

NT 4

396

NA4

396

277

NA4

277

70%

Total

14,533

6,748

21,281

7,463

10,067

17,530

82%

Notes 1. Federal and State figures are based on calendar months, and incorporate estimates and interpolations, where original data not available. Official and unofficial sources are used.

2. The SA Commission has advised that figures for the months of February, April and June 1997 were inflated by applications lodged on behalf of over 100 workers each month who were made redundant from SAMCorp (a large SA meat processing corporation) in February and April and from Bells (Sizzler) in June.

3. Tasmanian State figures are unofficial only. Official monthly figures are not produced by the Tasmanian Commission. The official total figures for the 1995/1996 and

1996/1997 financial years were contained in the Commission's annual reports for those years.

4. There are no separate Territory unfair dismissal systems, and there has been no separate Victorian unfair dismissal system after 1996.

(2) In relation to Federal unfair dismissal applications, the Australian Industrial Registry is collecting information on the number and percentage of unfair dismissal applications which apply to small businesses with 15 or less employees, for each month from December 1997 to May 1998. This information is being forwarded to Senator Murray. The information relating to applications from 1 December 1997 to 31 January 1998 is as follows.

Registry

Total termination of employment applications lodged

Total employer responses to Industrial Registry's question on employer size

Employers employing 15 or fewer employees

Employers employing 15 or fewer employees as % of total employer responses received

ACT

33

12

9

75

NSW

234

68

19

28

NT

43

18

8

44

QLD

55

29

6

21

SA

42

12

1

8

TAS

16

7

1

14

VIC

810

308

121

39

WA

50

17

1

6

Total

1,283

471

166

35

In relation to State unfair dismissal applications, it is not possible to provide information on the number and percentage of unfair dismissal applications which apply to small businesses with 15 or less employees, as no State collects data on the size of respondents to unfair dismissal applications.