

- Title
CHARTER OF BUDGET HONESTY BILL 1996
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
28-10-1997
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
- Page
8243
- Party
G(WA)
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator MARGETTS
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Bill
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1997-10-28/0104
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Nursing Homes
(Senator NEAL, Senator HERRON) -
Economy
(Senator MacGIBBON, Senator HILL) -
Nursing Homes
(Senator FORSHAW, Senator HERRON) -
Maritime Safety Standards
(Senator O'CHEE, Senator PARER) -
Gold
(Senator BISHOP, Senator KEMP) -
Port Hinchinbrook Development Project
(Senator WOODLEY, Senator HILL) -
Telecommunications
(Senator SCHACHT, Senator ALSTON) -
Coated Paper: Dumping
(Senator HARRADINE, Senator PARER) -
Interact Asia-Pacific Multimedia Festival
(Senator LUNDY, Senator ALSTON) -
Illicit Drugs
(Senator PAYNE, Senator VANSTONE) -
Education Expenses: Tax Deductibility
(Senator CARR, Senator KEMP) -
Member for Oxley
(Senator BOURNE, Senator HILL) -
Liquid Assets Test
(Senator DENMAN, Senator NEWMAN)
-
Nursing Homes
- PRIVILEGE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- COMMITTEES
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
- QUARANTINE AMENDMENT (MINISTERIAL APPROVAL) BILL 1997
- URANIUM MINING
- COMMITTEES
- UNDERGRADUATE FEES
- HUMAN RIGHTS
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- WHEAT MARKETING AMENDMENT BILL 1997
- NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT BILL 1997
- ASSENT TO LAWS
- WHEAT MARKETING AMENDMENT BILL 1997
-
CHARTER OF BUDGET HONESTY BILL 1996
-
In Committee
- Senator COOK
- Senator COOK
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator COOK
- Senator KEMP
- Senator COOK
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator COOK
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator KEMP
- Senator COOK
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator BROWN
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator COOK
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator BROWN
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator BROWN
- Senator COOK
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator COOK
- Senator BROWN
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator BROWN
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator COOK
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator BROWN
- Senator COOK
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator COOK
- Senator KEMP
- Senator BROWN
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
- NATIVE TITLE AMENDMENT (TRIBUNAL APPOINTMENTS) BILL 1997
-
GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS
- Meat Industry Council
- Murray-Darling Basin Commission
- Rural Adjustment Scheme Advisory Council
- Australian Defence Industries
- National Board of Employment, Education and Training
- Department of Health and Family Services
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission
- Private Health Insurance Complaints Commissioner
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
- Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
- Department of Primary Industries and Energy
- Safeguards Office and the Chemical Weapons Convention Office
- National Registration Authority for Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals
- Airservices Australia
- Indigenous Land Corporation
- Forest and Wood Products Research and Development Corporation
- Aboriginal Hostels Limited
- Genetic Manipulation Advisory Committee
- International Air Services Commission
- Department of Transport and Regional Development
- Australian Meat and Livestock Corporation
- Australian Pig Industry Council
- Meat Research Corporation
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Department of Primary Industries and Energy: Grants and Programs
(Senator O'Brien, Senator Parer) -
Kakadu National Park World Heritage Area
(Senator Lees, Senator Hill) -
Kakadu National Park: World Heritage Area
(Senator Brown, Senator Hill) -
Telecommunications Interception
(Senator Brown, Senator Vanstone)
-
Department of Primary Industries and Energy: Grants and Programs
Page: 8243
Senator MARGETTS(5.01 p.m.)
—I am still listening to the debate, but at this stage I am disposed to support the opposition's amendment to the Charter of Budget Honesty Bill 1996 . We are talking about a situation where the parliament is prorogued. Therefore, a lot of the normal day-to-day work of Treasury would be different from that normally directed to it by the respective ministers of other departments.
We also have to take into consideration the fact that Treasury have specific models. If various options were put to them for costings, it may well be a matter of simply dialling in different numbers or different levels to get responses. A model or spreadsheet may be put forward for which a similar model already exists, depending on the options that have been put forward. If there were several different options within one tax model, for instance, I imagine it would be a matter of changing the figures to get out a difference response.
It has been said quite a lot during history that the best government is formed on the basis of the best opposition. In the interests of good government, one would think it would be hard for a sensible government not to want the highest level of challenge to them and their policies. When policies come forward as alternatives, it sharpens everybody to make sure that those things are well thought out.
I have not seen Senator Cook's proposal on which he spent all night working in relation to executive power. Quite frankly, the government are saying that they are doing something new. Between us we probably have to work out exciting ways in which we can all be more effective and more accountable—governments, opposition and minor parties. It seems bizarre that governments will be able to give out information about non-government policies if that is not the wish of the non-government parties.
I would think there would be many, many things that the Treasury are asked to do where permission is not given and where details are not automatically made public. Perhaps the Assistant Treasurer (Senator Kemp) can enlighten me. Is it the case that everything that is put to Treasury for costing by the government is automatically made public? If that is not the case, there is obviously a precedent. I might be wrong, but I would have thought that many requests put to Treasury were not automatically published. If that is the case, perhaps that way of doing things extends the costings of opposition parties.