Save Search

Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
  

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Monday, 20 October 1997
Page: 7687

(Question No. 819)


Senator Faulkner asked the Minister for Communications and the Arts, upon notice, on 3 September 1997:

(1) What contracts for public relations services has the department, or its agencies, signed since 3 March 1996.

(2) What was the value of each contract.

(3) Did the value of any contract vary from the original cost; if so, what was the reason for the price variation.

(4) How many of the contracts in (1) were awarded following an open tender process.

(5) Where there was no tender process, what assessment criteria were followed in selecting the contractor and why was the normal practice of calling tenders not followed.

(6) Did the department seek guidance from the Office of Government Information and Advertising before signing the above contracts; if not, why not.

(7) How many journalists were employed by the department as at 3 March 1996.

(8) How many journalists are currently employed by the department.


Senator Alston —The answer to the honourable senator's question is as follows:

(1) to (6) Refer to the attachment.

(7) The "journalist" function is carried out by Public Affairs Officers. The following Public Affairs Officers were employed as at 3 March 1996:

Permanent

.   6   - Media and Public Affairs Unit

.   1   - Australian Archives

.   4   - National Science and Technology Centre

Temporary

.   1   - Media and Public Affairs Unit.

(8) The following Public Affairs Officers are currently employed:

Permanent

.   7   - Media and Public Affairs Unit (3 are outposted)

.   1   - Australian Archives

.   2   - National Science and Technology Centre

Temporary

.   3   - Media and Public Affairs Unit.

(1) Contracts with consultants for public relation services since 3 March 1996.(2) Value of contract.(3) Did the value vary from the original cost, if so what was the reason?(4) Open tender process?(5) If no tender process what were the assessment criteria and why were tenders not called?(6) Was guidance sought from OGIA, if not why not?
Arts and Heritage Division
Mary Dickie Issues Management trading as The Quay Connection$110,000NoA number of suppliers were invited to tender.-Yes.
Old Parliament House (OPH) Arts and Heritage Division
Ken Begg and Associates P/L$30,000Expenditure $22,500. Tasks completed prior to full expenditure.A number of suppliers were invited to tender.-No. Appropriate market enquiries were made by OPH.
T. Aubin$5,000NoA number of suppliers were invited to tender.-No. Appropriate market enquiries were made by OPH.
National Film and Sound Archive
Jennifer Dickson$84,320 (includes extensions).$3,750 Additional unforeseen work related to the main contract.Tenders advertised in the Canberra Times.-Yes.
National Science and Technology Centre
Environmentrics P/L$15,000NoA number of suppliers were invited to tender.-Yes.
Kopan P/L$150,000NoA number of suppliers were invited to tender.-Yes.
Killey Withy Punshon$1,000NoA number of suppliers were invited to tender.-Yes.
Kopan P/L$1,000NoA number of suppliers were invited to tender.-Yes.
Hero Communications$1,000NoA number of suppliers were invited to tender.-Yes.
Frank Small & Associates (Aust) P/L$2,600NoExisting contract used.Requirement was obtained under an existing Canberra Tourism contract.No. Existing contract.
David Lancashire Design$38,000Contract not completed.A number of suppliers were invited to tender.-Yes.
UnQwerty P/L$9,000Contract not completed.One firm approachedThe assessment criteria were: (a) previous experience with the project, including an affiliation with the subject matter and issues involved, (b) capacity to deliver within time and budget, and (c) value for money. The consultant had previously undertaken work on the project and was considered to be the most suitable.No. The consultant had previously undertaken work on the project and was considered to be the most suitable.