

- Title
SOCIAL SECURITY AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MALE TOTAL AVERAGE WEEKLY EARNINGS BENCHMARK) BILL 1997
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
30-09-1997
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
TAS
- Interjector
- Page
7251
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator NEWMAN
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Bill
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1997-09-30/0155
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Small Business
(Senator COONAN, Senator ALSTON) -
Travel Allowances
(Senator FAULKNER, Senator KEMP) -
Electricity
(Senator HEFFERNAN, Senator PARER) -
Travel Allowances
(Senator BOB COLLINS, Senator HILL) -
Employment Placement Agencies
(Senator KERNOT, Senator VANSTONE) -
Travel Allowances
(Senator LUNDY, Senator KEMP) -
Logging and Woodchipping
(Senator MARGETTS, Senator HILL) -
Travel Allowances
(Senator ROBERT RAY, Senator HILL) -
Youth Employment
(Senator SANDY MACDONALD, Senator VANSTONE) -
Native Title
(Senator BOLKUS, Senator ELLISON) -
Literacy and Numeracy
(Senator ALLISON, Senator VANSTONE) -
Native Title
(Senator BOLKUS, Senator HILL) -
Superannuation
(Senator GIBSON, Senator KEMP) -
Travel Allowances
(Senator FAULKNER, Senator KEMP) -
Child Support Scheme
(Senator O'CHEE, Senator NEWMAN)
-
Small Business
- SOUTH PACIFIC CRUISE LINES LTD
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- BUDGET 1997-98
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
-
FAMILY COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA (ORDERS OF REGISTRARS) BILL 1997
HEALTH INSURANCE COMMISSION (REFORM AND SEPARATION OF FUNCTIONS) BILL 1997 - MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 3) 1997
-
SOCIAL SECURITY AND VETERANS' AFFAIRS LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (MALE TOTAL AVERAGE WEEKLY EARNINGS BENCHMARK) BILL 1997
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator WOODLEY
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- Senator NEAL
- Senator NEWMAN
- GREENHOUSE GASES
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Social Security: Newly Arrived Residents
(Senator Stott Despoja, Senator Newman) -
Minister for Communications and the Arts: Media Monitoring Services
(Senator Robert Ray, Senator Alston) -
Migrant Funding: Electoral Division of Barton
(Senator Bolkus, Senator Vanstone) -
Government Contracts
(Senator Robert Ray, Senator Kemp) -
Climate Change Convention
(Senator Lees, Senator Hill) -
Government Contracts
(Senator Faulkner, Senator Newman) -
Australian Tourist Commission: Staff
(Senator Troeth, Senator Ellison) -
Department of Primary Industries and Energy: Salary Packaging
(Senator Chris Evans, Senator Parer)
-
Social Security: Newly Arrived Residents
Page: 7251
Senator NEWMAN (Minister for Social Security and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Status of Women)(6.45 p.m.)
—Madam Chairman, I do have here a copy of payment types that I said I would obtain for the Senate. I table those. Senator Neal might find that helpful.
The reality is that Senator Neal's amendment would see flow-ons to all allowees, including single allowees without children. I have said already, but I do not know whether you heard me, a flow-on to single allowees without children would cost $401 million over four years. The government is not prepared to commit to that.
I think that this debate is not going to go very much further, Senator. We really have covered the ground several times over. There is a difference of opinion between what you would do now that you are in opposition, and what you did during the time you were in government. We are moving to protect pensioners, as we thought was your intention. We believe that, by putting the money in the forward estimates, we have provided for the flow-on which, traditionally, has gone to a large number of allowees. But we cannot accept your request.