

- Title
AIDC SALE BILL 1997
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
26-05-1997
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
SHERRY
- Page
3531
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator CAMPBELL
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Bill
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1997-05-26/0023
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- REPRESENTATION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- SENATORS: SWEARING IN
- REPRESENTATION OF VICTORIA
- AIDC SALE BILL 1997
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Media Ownership
(Senator SCHACHT, Senator HILL) -
Economy
(Senator KNOWLES, Senator HILL) -
Wallis Inquiry
(Senator SHERRY, Senator HILL) -
Interest Rates
(Senator McGAURAN, Senator KEMP) -
Social Security: Income Stream Products
(Senator FOREMAN, Senator NEWMAN) -
Aboriginal Reconciliation
(Senator KERNOT, Senator HERRON) -
Public Service: Wage Levels
(Senator HOGG, Senator ALSTON) -
OECD: Multilateral Agreement on Investment
(Senator MARGETTS, Senator HILL) -
Public Servants: Authorisation of Expenditure
(Senator FAULKNER, Senator HILL) -
Youth Unemployment
(Senator SYNON, Senator VANSTONE) -
Mr David Oldfield
(Senator BISHOP, Senator KEMP)
-
Media Ownership
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- CONDOLENCES
- PETITIONS
-
NOTICES OF MOTION
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs
- Landmines
- Logging and Woodchipping
- Energy Research and Development Corporation
- Scrutiny of Bills Committee
- Consideration of Appropriation Bills by Legislation Committee
- Legal and Constitutional References Committee
- Days and Hours of Meeting
- Papua New Guinea
- Nigeria: Ogoni People
- Hazardous Waste
- Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee
- Legal and Constitutional Legislation Committee
- Higher Education Council Report
- Iran: Baha'i Faith and Human Rights
- Logging in Indonesia
- Sri Lanka
- COMMITTEES
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1997
- LOGGING AND WOODCHIPPING
- COMMITTEES
- DOCUMENTS
- ASSENT TO LAWS
- COMMITTEES
-
INTERNATIONAL TAX AGREEMENTS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1997
CRIMES AMENDMENT (FORENSIC PROCEDURES) BILL 1997
CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION (ELECTION) BILL 1997 - HAZARDOUS WASTE
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- CUSTOMS AND EXCISE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1996 (No. 2)
- DOCUMENTS
-
CUSTOMS AND EXCISE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1996 (No. 2) -
HEARING SERVICES ADMINISTRATION BILL 1997
HEARING SERVICES AND AGHS REFORM BILL 1997- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Senator FORSHAW
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator NEAL
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator NEAL
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator NEAL
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator NEAL
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator NEAL
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator FORSHAW
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator ALLISON
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 3531
Senator CAMPBELL (Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer)(1.36 p.m.)
—The rhetoric of Senator Sherry does not match the rhetoric of the Labor government and particularly of Senator Ray, when he was defence minister, who actually negotiated this pre-emptive right for Kockums.
Senator Sherry
—Yes, but we didn't sell it to them, did we?
Senator CAMPBELL
—No, but you have negotiated the arrangement whereby Kockums have a right. This government has not done anything about that arrangement whatsoever. This bill does not change that amendment. This bill, as amended by Senator Murray's amendment—if it is passed in this place, and I put money on the fact that it will at this stage; I join you on that—ensures that, if the shareholding in the Australian Submarine Corporation is to be sold, it cannot be sold to a foreign person as described by the FAT—the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Act.
However, the exercise of Kockums's pre-emptive rights, I am advised, would require Foreign Investment Review Board approval under the FAT Act. So there still is a requirement there, but it is quite unbelievable that a Labor Party senator should come in here and criticise the fact that a Swedish owned company should not have a right to purchase the balance of the company when it was actually the Australian Labor Party minister and government who negotiated that right. For the Senate to then seek to overturn that would be a government breach in that contract. It could quite clearly give rise to issues of compensation if the Australian government was forced to do that.