Save Search
    Prev   Next   Return to results listPrint ListEmail Document Link

Title

TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 1996

TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (TELECOMMUNICATIONS) BILL 1996

AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY BILL 1996

TELECOMMUNICATIONS (UNIVERSAL SERVICE LEVY) BILL 1996

TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE CHARGES) BILL 1996

TELECOMMUNICATIONS (NUMBERING CHARGES) BILL 1996

TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS AND CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996

TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE FEES) TERMINATION BILL 1996

RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (TRANSMITTER LICENCE TAX) AMENDMENT BILL 1996

RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (RECEIVER LICENCE TAX) AMENDMENT BILL 1996

RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 1996

TELECOMMUNICATIONS (NUMBERING FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 1996

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 1996

In Committee

Database

Senate Hansard

Date

20-03-1997

Source

Senate

Parl No.

38

Electorate

SA

Interjector

CHAIRMAN

Page

2053

Party

ALP

Presenter

 

Status

Final

Question No.

 

Questioner

 

Responder

 

Speaker

Senator SCHACHT

Stage

 

Type

 

Context

Bill

System Id

chamber/hansards/1997-03-20/0312


Note: Where available, the PDF/Word icon below is provided to view the complete and fully formatted document
  

Previous Fragment    Next Fragment
Thursday, 20 March 1997
Page: 2053


Senator SCHACHT(6.53 p.m.) —We had the round table discussion at the Senate hearing where Vodafone and Optus made a bit of a point and Telstra admitted that only seven of their towers had had some sort of collocation. So you are saying that this is how that is being addressed?


Senator ALSTON —Yes, it arises out of that discussion.


Senator SCHACHT —If that is the case, the opposition supports the amendments, which have nothing to do with the other issues relating to towers which will come up later under `immunities'.