

- Title
ORDER OF BUSINESS
Business of the Senate
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
17-03-1997
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
TAS
- Interjector
ABETZ
- Page
1607
- Party
IND
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator HARRADINE
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Order of Business
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1997-03-17/0153
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- REPRESENTATION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
-
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1997
BOUNTY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1997 - ORDER OF BUSINESS
-
INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT BILL 1996
INCOME TAX (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996
INCOME TAX (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL 1996-
In Committee
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator MARGETTS
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
-
FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Senator CARR
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator O'BRIEN
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator CARR
- Senator MURRAY
- Third Reading
-
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 1996
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (TELECOMMUNICATIONS) BILL 1996
AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (UNIVERSAL SERVICE LEVY) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE CHARGES) TERMINATION BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (NUMBERING CHARGES) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS AND CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE FEES) BILL 1996 -
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (TRANSMITTER LICENCE TAX) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (RECEIVER LICENCE TAX) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (NUMBERING FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 1996 - MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 3) 1996
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- EUTHANASIA LEGISLATION
- EUTHANASIA LAWS BILL 1996
- Adjournment
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1607
Senator HARRADINE(8.55 p.m.)
—by leave—Senator Brown gives his principal concern as being that the people of the Northern Territory will not be able to listen to the debate. We are on broadcasting time and if any sensible Northern Territorian is listening to the debate—
Honourable senator interjecting—
Senator HARRADINE
—They do not get it up there? Good luck to them! I was going to say that they would not be sensible, because if I were them I would be listening to the test between Australia and South Africa, to be frank. That would have been a more sensible reason for not having this debate at this present point in time than the one given by Senator Brown.
We all agree, whether we are for the legislation or against it, that the Euthanasia Laws Bill is a major matter of public policy which should be determined by consideration by this chamber. The legislation has been put forward in the House of Representatives, it has come before us and we have to tackle it at some stage. Why not start tonight? There has been no reasonable cause put forward by Senator Brown for it not to be considered tonight—either that or he wants to gag the thing. Does he want to gag debate on it? If not, why can't we at least start dealing with it tonight? As I understand it, people in the chamber, with the exception of Senator Brown, want to start on it tonight. We are going to be pressed for time. I do not think anybody, frankly, whether they are supporting or opposing the bill, wants to gag the debate.
Senator Abetz
—That's an unconscionable delaying tactic.
Senator HARRADINE
—As Senator Abetz said, it is an unconscionable delaying tactic. We ought to all agree to deal with it tonight in the two hours that we have. If we are fortunate enough to get through all of the debate on it before time in the second reading stage, then so much the better. I do not think, with all due respect, that denying leave to have this matter debated as part of the ongoing debate tonight is serving any useful
purpose other than to put off the day when the determination will need to be made.