

- Title
FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT BILL 1996
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
17-03-1997
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
- Page
1576
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator ELLISON
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Bill
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1997-03-17/0098
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- REPRESENTATION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
-
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1997
BOUNTY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1997 - ORDER OF BUSINESS
-
INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT BILL 1996
INCOME TAX (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996
INCOME TAX (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL 1996-
In Committee
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator MARGETTS
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
-
FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Senator CARR
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator O'BRIEN
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator CARR
- Senator MURRAY
- Third Reading
-
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 1996
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (TELECOMMUNICATIONS) BILL 1996
AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (UNIVERSAL SERVICE LEVY) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE CHARGES) TERMINATION BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (NUMBERING CHARGES) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS AND CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE FEES) BILL 1996 -
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (TRANSMITTER LICENCE TAX) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (RECEIVER LICENCE TAX) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (NUMBERING FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 1996 - MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 3) 1996
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- EUTHANASIA LEGISLATION
- EUTHANASIA LAWS BILL 1996
- Adjournment
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1576
Senator ELLISON (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Health and Family Services and Parliamentary Secretary to the Attorney-General)(5.03 p.m.)
—Firstly, in relation to the comparison of those people who seek counselling at the Family Court as opposed to the community agencies, the best I can advise you at this stage, Senator Harradine, is that, in the year 1995-96, some 31,500 people sought counselling in the Family Court jurisdiction. In the year 1994-95, some 90,000 people sought counselling in the community sector. I have not been able to obtain figures which relate to the same year but we believe that those figures would not have changed greatly—one would imagine that they would be roughly in the same order. So, in round terms, you would have one to three when comparing how many go to the Family Court for counselling to those who go to the community agencies such as Relationships Australia and Centrecare. So, it seems that by far the majority of people choose to go to those agencies run in the community.
As to the government's policy in relation to marriage and relationship counselling, I understand that some 34 centres have been approved. However, the community education program is yet to start and I understood that there was some half a million dollars dedicated to that. That has yet to start, but those centres have been approved.
You also raised the question of the effect that this might have on community agencies. Some concerns have been expressed to the government from the community sector, and those concerns are being taken up. Certainly, I will take up with the Attorney-General the matters that you have raised here, and they, no doubt, could have some relevance to the regulations that come into play. I think I have covered the questions that you asked, Senator Harradine. Forgive me if I have missed one. Was there another one?