

- Title
FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT BILL 1996
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
17-03-1997
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
- Page
1573
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator ELLISON
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Bill
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1997-03-17/0090
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- REPRESENTATION OF NEW SOUTH WALES
-
TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1997
BOUNTY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1997 - ORDER OF BUSINESS
-
INCOME TAX ASSESSMENT BILL 1996
INCOME TAX (CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996
INCOME TAX (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) BILL 1996-
In Committee
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator KEMP
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator SHERRY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator KEMP
- Senator KERNOT
- Senator MARGETTS
- Third Reading
-
In Committee
-
FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Senator CARR
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator O'BRIEN
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator MURRAY
- Senator ELLISON
- Senator CARR
- Senator MURRAY
- Third Reading
-
TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL 1996
TRADE PRACTICES AMENDMENT (TELECOMMUNICATIONS) BILL 1996
AUSTRALIAN COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (UNIVERSAL SERVICE LEVY) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE CHARGES) TERMINATION BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (NUMBERING CHARGES) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS AND CONSEQUENTIAL AMENDMENTS) BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (CARRIER LICENCE FEES) BILL 1996 -
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (TRANSMITTER LICENCE TAX) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS (RECEIVER LICENCE TAX) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS (NUMBERING FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 1996
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMENDMENT BILL 1996 - MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 3) 1996
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- EUTHANASIA LEGISLATION
- EUTHANASIA LAWS BILL 1996
- Adjournment
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 1573
Senator ELLISON (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Health and Family Services and Parliamentary Secretary to the Attorney-General)(4.46 p.m.)
—The average number of sessions envisaged is 1.8, which I believe would be in the region of $60. I think that is something of a yardstick. Of course, that would vary, though, depending on the circumstances. When looking at this issue, the government had regard to fees charged by the various agencies in the community.
Senator Cooney touched on the fact that this can vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For instance, looking at fees charged by Centacare, New South Wales, South Australia and Western Australia apply different fees according to the financial situation of the people concerned. In relation to Relationships Australia, the level is again a bit different. So the government really had to look at a variety of fees which are being charged in the community and then draw from that what might be an appropriate fee. I must stress, as I indicated earlier, this has been negotiated with the Family Court and the regulations will reflect this. That is how the government approached it.