

- Title
TELSTRA (DILUTION OF PUBLIC OWNERSHIP) BILL 1996
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
10-12-1996
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN (Senator Calvert)
- Page
7101
- Party
G(WA)
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator MARGETTS
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Bill
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1996-12-10/0158
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- TELSTRA (DILUTION OF PUBLIC OWNERSHIP) BILL 1996
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
(Senator GIBBS, Senator VANSTONE) -
Human Rights
(Senator ELLISON, Senator HILL) -
United Nations Security Council
(Senator SCHACHT, Senator HILL) -
Unemployment: Labour Market Assistance
(Senator WATSON, Senator VANSTONE) -
Family Tax Initiative Advertising Campaign
(Senator FAULKNER, Senator HILL) -
Quarantine
(Senator WOODLEY, Senator PARER) -
Office of Government Information and Advertising
(Senator ROBERT RAY, Senator KEMP) -
Adoption of Orphans in People's Republic of China
(Senator HARRADINE, Senator HILL) -
Research and Development
(Senator BISHOP, Senator PARER) -
Mining: Environment
(Senator FERRIS, Senator PARER) -
Defence: Glenn Review
(Senator JACINTA COLLINS, Senator NEWMAN) -
Telecommunications Code
(Senator ALLISON, Senator ALSTON) -
Migrants: Incarceration Rates
(Senator MURPHY, Senator VANSTONE) -
ATSIC: Chairman
(Senator FERGUSON, Senator HERRON) -
Minister for Finance
(Senator KEMP) - Research and Development
-
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- MS LOIS O'DONOGHUE
- WESTERN AUSTRALIAN COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT
- BURMA
- MEDICARE
- BURMA
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- PROCEEDS OF CRIME AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- FIRST SPEECH
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING AUTHORITY
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
-
TELSTRA (DILUTION OF PUBLIC OWNERSHIP) BILL 1996
-
In Committee
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator MURPHY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator MURPHY
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator ALLISON
-
In Committee
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- TELSTRA (DILUTION OF PUBLIC OWNERSHIP) BILL 1996
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 7101
Senator MARGETTS(7.18 p.m.)
—I can imagine the frustration of people listening to this debate today on the Telstra (Dilution of Public Ownership) Bill. There is some ability to gain information under the bill, but I contend that if this bill goes through the government will not have the ability to act on it. We have all these assumptions. We have heard the Minister for Communications and the Arts (Senator Alston) talk about the ability in the future to be able to make appropriations—that is, to try to fix up muck-ups where those community service obligations are being provided.
But the reality is, if the power to direct has been taken from the minister and the government, who has that power? The power is in the board. The Gambotto case, I contend, is relevant. It is not possible to oppress minority shareholders. You are trying to maximise the price of this partial privatisation of Telstra because people are expecting to make a profit. They are not going to be buying Telstra in order to provide a public service.
So, basically, you could provide as many little packages of parliamentary appropriations as you like but you cannot force the entity you are creating to use them. They can say it is not in their interests to service. Even if you provide capital funding, they might decide, because you do not have the power to direct them, that they do not want the expense of servicing that capital. They might decide that you do not have the ability to even make them use your appropriations. That is the reality. You can appropriate for all you like, but you have lost that ability. Minister, if you do not have the power to direct, who does?
Progress reported.