

- Title
TELSTRA (DILUTION OF PUBLIC OWNERSHIP) BILL 1996
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
10-12-1996
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
VIC
- Interjector
The TEMPORARY CHAIRMAN (Senator Calvert)
- Page
7016
- Party
ALP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator COONEY
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Bill
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1996-12-10/0007
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- TELSTRA (DILUTION OF PUBLIC OWNERSHIP) BILL 1996
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
(Senator GIBBS, Senator VANSTONE) -
Human Rights
(Senator ELLISON, Senator HILL) -
United Nations Security Council
(Senator SCHACHT, Senator HILL) -
Unemployment: Labour Market Assistance
(Senator WATSON, Senator VANSTONE) -
Family Tax Initiative Advertising Campaign
(Senator FAULKNER, Senator HILL) -
Quarantine
(Senator WOODLEY, Senator PARER) -
Office of Government Information and Advertising
(Senator ROBERT RAY, Senator KEMP) -
Adoption of Orphans in People's Republic of China
(Senator HARRADINE, Senator HILL) -
Research and Development
(Senator BISHOP, Senator PARER) -
Mining: Environment
(Senator FERRIS, Senator PARER) -
Defence: Glenn Review
(Senator JACINTA COLLINS, Senator NEWMAN) -
Telecommunications Code
(Senator ALLISON, Senator ALSTON) -
Migrants: Incarceration Rates
(Senator MURPHY, Senator VANSTONE) -
ATSIC: Chairman
(Senator FERGUSON, Senator HERRON) -
Minister for Finance
(Senator KEMP) - Research and Development
-
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission
- PETITIONS
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- MS LOIS O'DONOGHUE
- WESTERN AUSTRALIAN COMMISSION ON GOVERNMENT
- BURMA
- MEDICARE
- BURMA
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
- PROCEEDS OF CRIME AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- FIRST SPEECH
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- NATIONAL CAPITAL PLANNING AUTHORITY
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
-
TELSTRA (DILUTION OF PUBLIC OWNERSHIP) BILL 1996
-
In Committee
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator MURPHY
- Senator MARGETTS
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator COONEY
- Senator MURPHY
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator ALLISON
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator ALSTON
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator HARRADINE
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator SCHACHT
- Senator ALLISON
-
In Committee
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- TELSTRA (DILUTION OF PUBLIC OWNERSHIP) BILL 1996
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 7016
Senator COONEY(12.49 p.m.)
—On the consumer protection issue, in the present act you have section 38, which talks about the quality of standard telephone services. That section is headed `General functions—protection of public interest and consumers'. Why is new proposed division 6 confined to issues of the period that it takes to connect customers and the period that it takes to offer customers arrangements and such matters? There is a whole division on that sort of thing, yet issues of quality are left to section 38.
Why don't you put the two concepts together? Why do we separate the concepts? When you say that there is not much in the way of punishment there at the moment, as I understand it, there are quite heavy penalties proposed already under civil proceedings for failing to obey Austel direction—up to $10 million, for example. All I really want to know is why you separate those two things out.