

- Title
CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1996
Consideration of House of Representatives Message
In Committee
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
28-06-1996
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
38
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
COOK
- Page
2546
- Party
G(WA)
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator MARGETTS
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Bill
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1996-06-28/0043
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- CIVIL AVIATION AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- COMMITTEES
- DEVELOPMENT ALLOWANCE AUTHORITY AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- TAXATION LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1996
- CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1996
- COMMITTEES
- CONSIDERATION OF LEGISLATION
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1996
- DEVELOPMENT ALLOWANCE AUTHORITY AMENDMENT BILL 1996
- CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1996
- MINISTER FOR ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER AFFAIRS
- COMMITTEES
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- SPECIAL ADJOURNMENT
- LEAVE OF ABSENCE
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- ASIA PACIFIC PARLIAMENTARY FORUM
- COMMITTEES
- MIGRATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1996
- SENATOR-ELECT FERRIS
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- DOCUMENTS
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
Page: 2546
Senator MARGETTS(11.13 a.m.)
—Were you putting all your amendments together?
Senator Cook
—Yes.
Senator MARGETTS
—I have made it quite clear that we are not over the moon about these amendments. We are not really happy about putting in a ministerial discretion rather than removing it, which is what we would have preferred—we would have preferred the bill not to be here, anyway. We were prepared to support amendment No. 1. The item 7 part of it was better than not having it. The problem we have is largely centred around item 57. It is still not really very special from our point of view. As I say, we still do not much like the bill but, on balance, we will support the chunk of amendments.