

- Title
CROSS-MEDIA RULES
Motion
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
21-06-1995
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
37
- Electorate
NSW
- Interjector
- Page
1550
- Party
AD
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator BOURNE
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Miscellaneous
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1995-06-21/0139
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PETITIONS
- NUCLEAR TESTING IN THE PACIFIC
- NOTICES OF MOTION
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- COMMITTEES
- DAYS AND HOURS OF MEETING
- NUCLEAR WEAPONS TESTING
- COMMITTEES
- FAMILY LAW REFORM BILL 1994
- CHILD CARE LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1995
- SOCIAL SECURITY LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL (No. 1) 1995
- COMMITTEES
-
EXPORT MARKET DEVELOPMENT GRANTS AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1994 [1995]
- Second Reading
-
In Committee
- Senator COOK
- Senator PARER
- Senator COOK
- Senator PARER
- Senator COOK
- Senator PARER
- Senator COOK
- Senator PARER
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator COOK
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator COOK
- Senator PARER
- Senator COOK
- Senator O'CHEE
- Senator COOK
- Senator O'CHEE
- Senator COOK
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator COOK
- Senator O'CHEE
- Senator COOK
- Senator O'CHEE
- Senator COOK
- Senator PARER
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator COOK
- Senator COOK
- Senator PARER
- Senator COOK
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator PARER
- Senator O'CHEE
- Senator PARER
- Senator O'CHEE
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator CROWLEY
- Senator PARER
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator PARER
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator CROWLEY
- Senator PARER
- Senator SPINDLER
- Senator McMULLAN
- Third Reading
- CROSS-MEDIA RULES
-
MEDICARE LEVY AMENDMENT BILL 1995
FRINGE BENEFITS TAX AMENDMENT BILL 1995 - MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Great Barrier Reef
(Senator REYNOLDS, Senator FAULKNER) -
Minister for Human Services and Health
(Senator VANSTONE, Senator BOLKUS) -
Economy: OECD Survey
(Senator FOREMAN, Senator COOK) -
Economy: OECD Survey
(Senator KERNOT, Senator COOK) -
Trade
(Senator CHILDS, Senator McMULLAN) -
Minister for Human Services and Health
(Senator PANIZZA, Senator BOLKUS) -
Public Sector Services
(Senator HARRADINE, Senator COOK) -
Interest Rates
(Senator CAMPBELL, Senator COOK)
-
Great Barrier Reef
- QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
-
MEDICARE LEVY AMENDMENT BILL 1995
FRINGE BENEFITS TAX AMENDMENT BILL 1995 - INDUSTRY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT BILL 1995
- PATENTS AMENDMENT BILL 1995
- BILLS RETURNED FROM THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
-
CIVIL AVIATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1995
AIR SERVICES BILL 1995 - FIRST SPEECH
- CODES OF CONDUCT
-
CIVIL AVIATION LEGISLATION AMENDMENT BILL 1995
AIR SERVICES BILL 1995 - PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- DOCUMENTS
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
Page: 1550
Senator BOURNE (12.31 p.m.)
—I agree, and I think everybody here agrees, that the changes to cross-media rules are a very vital part of the communications debate in this country. Of course, the sooner we see it, the better. I have spoken to Senator McMullan about this matter. As usual, I have found him to be very reasonable and sensible in his approach. I know that he, too, would like to see this as a public document. Obviously, it has to be a public document; it has always had to be a public document. We have been calling for that forever. I do not see any reason why the ABA should be able to do things in secret when the ABT did not.
I have spoken to a few people today. It is their opinion—and I must say it has influenced my thinking—that it would be a very sensible and reasonable move for everybody in the Australian community, including the ALP backbench, to be able to see the ABA report before cabinet makes a decision. They should at least have the opportunity to have some input into cabinet's decision. They should have the opportunity to see that report before cabinet makes its decision on how it will respond.
I must apologise to Senator McMullan because I know this is not what I said to him on the phone. I must say that I found that argument really quite persuasive. I think it is a sensible one. I certainly want to see it as soon as possible. It is the case that yesterday I was prepared to wait until next week. Having heard that argument in particular, I find that it is a very good argument. The government backbench, as well as I, ought to be able to see this before cabinet makes a decision. I would like to see it as soon as possible and I will be voting for the motion.