

- Title
SELECT COMMITTEE ON ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING A JUDGE
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
06-09-1984
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
33
- Electorate
WA
- Interjector
Senator McIntosh
- Page
595
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
- Question No.
- Questioner
- Responder
- Speaker
Senator DURACK
- Stage
- Type
- Context
Committee
- System Id
chamber/hansards/1984-09-06/0083

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- MINISTERIAL ARRANGEMENTS
- PETITIONS
- PRESENTATION OF PAPERS
-
CONSTITUTIONAL AND LEGAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
- Ministerial Statement
- JOINT COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND DEFENCE REPORT ON REGIONAL CONFLICT AND SUPER-POWER RIVALRY IN THE HORN OF AFRICA: GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
-
SOCIAL SECURITY AND REPATRIATION (BUDGET MEASURES AND ASSETS TEST) BILL 1984
- Second Reading
-
LOAN BILL 1984
- Second Reading
- ORDER OF BUSINESS
- SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE CONDUCT OF A JUDGE
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC INTEREST
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
ROYAL COMMISSION ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE FEDERATED SHIP PAINTERS AND DOCKERS UNION
(Senator WATSON, Senator GARETH EVANS) -
IN VITRO FERTILISATION PROGRAM
(Senator ELSTOB, Senator GARETH EVANS) -
ROYAL COMMISSION ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE FEDERATED SHIP PAINTERS AND DOCKERS UNION
(Senator CHANEY, Senator GARETH EVANS) -
REPETITIVE STRAIN INJURY
(Senator CROWLEY, Senator GRIMES) -
ENERGY SOURCES
(Senator MASON, Senator WALSH) -
ALLEGED ILL-TREATMENT OF PRISONER
(Senator PRIMMER, Senator GARETH EVANS) -
DISTRICT COURT DECISIONS
(Senator TEAGUE, Senator GARETH EVANS) -
PENSIONS ASSETS TEST
(Senator HEARN, Senator GIETZELT) -
PENSIONS ASSETS TEST
(Senator BJELKE-PETERSEN, Senator GRIMES) -
QUEENSLAND TURF CLUB
(Senator JONES, Senator GARETH EVANS) -
RESIDENTIAL COLLEGES SUBSIDY
(Senator PETER BAUME, Senator RYAN) -
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, PERTH
(Senator GILES, Senator GARETH EVANS) -
AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY: COMMISSIONER FOR HOUSING LOANS
(Senator REID, Senator GIETZELT) -
UNEMPLOYMENT
(Senator SIBRAA, Senator BUTTON) -
INQUIRY INTO THE CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING THE MAKING OF A CUSTOMS DECLARATION
(Senator CHANEY, Senator BUTTON) -
AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL
(Senator FOREMAN, Senator GIETZELT) -
TAX AVOIDANCE
(Senator JACK EVANS, Senator WALSH) -
NATIONAL WAGE HEARING
(Senator COOK, Senator BUTTON) -
BILL OF RIGHTS
(Senator HARRADINE, Senator GARETH EVANS)
-
ROYAL COMMISSION ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE FEDERATED SHIP PAINTERS AND DOCKERS UNION
- CUSTOMS SURVEILLANCE: ABRAHAM SAFFRON
- COASTAL SURVEILLANCE
-
STANDING COMMITTEE ON REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES
- Seventy-fifth Report
- SELECT COMMITTEE ON THE CONDUCT OF A JUDGE
- SELECT COMMITTEE ON ALLEGATIONS CONCERNING A JUDGE
-
COMMISSION OF INQUIRY INTO THE CONDUCT OF A JUDGE
- Withdrawal of Notice of Motion
- PARLIAMENT HOUSE TELEPHONE SYSTEM
- SALES TAX (Nos 1 TO 9) AMENDMENT BILLS 1984
- SALES TAX (EXEMPTIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS) AMENDMENT BILL 1984
- CUSTOMS TARIFF AMENDMENT BILL (No. 2) 1984
-
SOUTH PACIFIC FORUM AND VISIT TO FIJI
- Text of Statement by the Prime Minister
- STANDING ORDERS COMMITTEE
- ADJOURNMENT
- PAPERS
- ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS
Page: 595
Senator DURACK(5.24)
—The Opposition will oppose the amendments moved by Senator Haines because it believes that the Government has forfeited any right to be in control of the Senate Select Committee on Allegations Concerning a Judge. This Government from go to whoa has behaved disgracefully. In particular, the Attorney-General (Senator Gareth Evans) has been a disgrace to his office in the way in which this matter has been dealt with. It is not often that an Opposition in the Senate seeks to prevent a government having control of a committee of the Senate, but there are precedents --
Senator McIntosh
—In 1974.
Senator DURACK
—We do not have to go back until then. We need go back only two years when those opposite were in opposition and set up a committee, which the then Government did not control, to investigate the then Government's proposals for major amendments to the Conciliation and Arbitration Act. That is a very clear and recent precedent, and there are plenty of other precedents.
In this case the reason that the Opposition is not prepared to agree to the Government having control of this Committee is that the Government has forfeited that right because of the attitude it has exhibited to this problem from the word go, particularly its attitude in relation to the matter before us this week when the Attorney-General has deliberately gone out of his way, supported by the Government to my astonishment because I thought the Prime Minister (Mr Hawke) might have been able to take a slightly more statesmanlike view of this problem, to deny any co-operation to the Senate. Over and over again that denial of co- operation has been made by the Attorney-General inside and outside this chamber. In those circumstances the Opposition frankly does not trust the Government to behave in an honourable way in relation to this Committee. I am sorry to have to say that, but that is the situation revealed by the approach of the Attorney- General. We are not going to support any amendments which give the Government, in its present mood and in view of its likely attitude to this Committee, control of the Committee.