

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Taxation
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-08-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
Payne, Sen Marise
Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Page
5566
- Party
LP
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Payne, Sen Marise
- Responder
Wong, Sen Penny
- Speaker
- Stage
- Type
- Context
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- System Id
chamber/hansards/11dd623c-68aa-46b1-856b-0bffdb0e664a/0127
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill 2011, Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011
- Legislative Instruments Amendment (Sunsetting) Bill 2011
- Indigenous Affairs Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Amendment Bill 2011
- Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (National Regulator) Bill 2011, Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Registration Fees) Amendment Bill 2011, Offshore Petroleum (Royalty) Amendment Bill 2011, Offshore Resources Legislation Amendment (Personal Property Securities) Bill 2011, Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Regulatory Levies Legislation Amendment (2011 Measures No. 2) Bill 2011
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Employment
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Pricing
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Taxation
(Payne, Sen Marise, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Taxation
(Pratt, Sen Louise, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Manufacturing
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Apple Imports
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Carbon Pricing
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Housing
(Bilyk, Sen Catryna, Arbib, Sen Mark)
-
Member for Dobell
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Question No. 371)
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 735)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Naltrexone (Question No. 835)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
IP Australia (Question No. 891)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Special Purpose Aircraft (Question No. 898)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Question No. 371)
Page: 5566
Taxation
Senator PAYNE (New South Wales) (14:24): My question is to the Minister representing the Treasurer, Senator Wong. Can the minister explain why at a time of increasing economic uncertainty as a result of the carbon tax and a chronic housing shortage the government is now imposing additional tax reporting obligations on the thousands of self-employed tradespeople who make up a crucial part of the housing and construction sector?
Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Finance and Deregulation) (14:24): First, there are a number of aspects to the first part of that question which obviously we do not agree with in terms of the effect of a carbon price. I think we have had a previous discussion in this place, including with the senator, on the likely impact of a carbon price, which is not what she has previously asserted both publicly and in this place. I would also point out the unprecedented investment this government has put into both social housing and housing more broadly. I think the senator is referring to an initiative announced in the budget that the Assistant Treasurer has carriage of in terms of reporting arrangements, so I do not have information before me to assist her in more detail, but if she asks a further question I will see if I can provide anything; otherwise I will take the question on notice.
Senator PAYNE (New South Wales) (14:25): Mr President, I ask a supplementary question. Can the minister advise why the government is not prepared to let independent contractors get on with the business of building houses instead of tying them up in red tape and viewing them only as possible employees and, I assume, potential future union members?
Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Finance and Deregulation) (14:26): It is amazing how much they return to the desire to trash the trade union movement. My recollection, and I will correct this or add to this if I am wrong, is that the initiative which was announced in the budget was in relation to reporting arrangements—
Senator Payne: It is a massive compliance issue.
Senator WONG: It is interesting that the senator is so concerned about small business when her party is opposing a tax cut for small business. Let us be clear. Every time the Liberal Party come in here and argue about small business and pretend that they care about small business, they should be upfront with the Australian people that they must be the first coalition in decades who are actually arguing for higher taxation rates for Australian small business. So if she is worried about red tape and compliance I suggest that the senator might look at the economic lunacy of their position, which is about imposing higher taxes on this sector. But in relation to the initiative, I understand it is a payment reporting system designed to improve the tax compliance of businesses in this sector. (Time expired)
Senator PAYNE (New South Wales) (14:28): I ask a further supplementary question, Mr President. Will the minister indicate whether the government will actually compensate these self-employed tradespeople for the extra time and money they will have to devote to complying with this new reporting burden, especially when they are also going to be suffering from the higher costs of the carbon tax?
Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Finance and Deregulation) (14:28): You would have to say that one of the largest compliance burdens imposed on small business by a government was in fact the Howard government with the GST. Don't we all remember that. It is interesting that Senator Payne wants to come in here and talk about compliance burdens.
Senator Conroy: That is a Liberal Party tax, so it is okay.
Senator WONG: Senator Conroy reminds me that taxes imposed by Liberal governments, including state governments in the mining sector, are okay. As I recall from the budget announcements, the reason this was introduced was that the ATO had found a high level of noncompliance in relation to tax obligations by contractors in this industry. The senator may not believe that tax compliance is an important principle, but a party with sensible economic policies would recognise that it is.