

- Title
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act
- Database
Senate Hansard
- Date
25-08-2011
- Source
Senate
- Parl No.
43
- Electorate
- Interjector
- Page
5564
- Party
AG
- Presenter
- Status
Final
- Question No.
- Questioner
Waters, Sen Larissa
- Responder
Conroy, Sen Stephen
- Speaker
- Stage
- Type
- Context
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- System Id
chamber/hansards/11dd623c-68aa-46b1-856b-0bffdb0e664a/0126
Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- PARLIAMENTARY OFFICE HOLDERS
- BUSINESS
- BILLS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- BUSINESS
- NOTICES
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- BILLS
- MOTIONS
- COMMITTEES
- BUDGET
- COMMITTEES
-
BILLS
- Tobacco Plain Packaging Bill 2011, Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011
- Legislative Instruments Amendment (Sunsetting) Bill 2011
- Indigenous Affairs Legislation Amendment Bill 2011
- Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security Amendment Bill 2011
- Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Amendment (National Regulator) Bill 2011, Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage (Registration Fees) Amendment Bill 2011, Offshore Petroleum (Royalty) Amendment Bill 2011, Offshore Resources Legislation Amendment (Personal Property Securities) Bill 2011, Offshore Petroleum and Greenhouse Gas Storage Regulatory Levies Legislation Amendment (2011 Measures No. 2) Bill 2011
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
Member for Dobell
(Ronaldson, Sen Michael, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Employment
(Crossin, Sen Trish, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Carbon Pricing
(Cormann, Sen Mathias, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act
(Waters, Sen Larissa, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Taxation
(Payne, Sen Marise, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Taxation
(Pratt, Sen Louise, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Manufacturing
(Colbeck, Sen Richard, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Apple Imports
(Xenophon, Sen Nick, Conroy, Sen Stephen) -
Carbon Pricing
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Wong, Sen Penny) -
Housing
(Bilyk, Sen Catryna, Arbib, Sen Mark)
-
Member for Dobell
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: ADDITIONAL ANSWERS
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE: TAKE NOTE OF ANSWERS
- COMMITTEES
- AUDITOR-GENERAL'S REPORTS
- COMMITTEES
- MOTIONS
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- FIRST SPEECH
- DOCUMENTS
- COMMITTEES
- ADJOURNMENT
- DOCUMENTS
-
QUESTIONS ON NOTICE
-
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Question No. 371)
(Boswell, Sen Ronald, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
Defence: Staffing (Question No. 735)
(Johnston, Sen David, Evans, Sen Christopher) -
Naltrexone (Question No. 835)
(Ludlam, Sen Scott, Ludwig, Sen Joe) -
IP Australia (Question No. 891)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Carr, Sen Kim) -
Defence: Special Purpose Aircraft (Question No. 898)
(Abetz, Sen Eric, Evans, Sen Christopher)
-
Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (Question No. 371)
Page: 5564
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act
Senator WATERS (Queensland) (14:19): My question is to the Minister representing the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, Senator Conroy. In relation to the government's response to the independent review of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, announced yesterday, we note Minister Burke's reference to the possibility of the federal government devolving to the states some of its decision-making powers to approve, refuse or condition proposed actions on the basis of certain conditions, thresholds or standards. Can the minister explain in what circumstances this abrogation of federal responsibility is being considered and what are the conditions, thresholds and standards that will apply?
Senator CONROY (Victoria—Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Digital Productivity) (14:20): I thank the senator for her question. The Australian government's reform of national environment law will ensure better and smarter environmental protection into the future. The reforms will also reduce business costs by cutting red tape and unnecessary delay. Since the EPBC Act was introduced more than 10 years ago, environmental management has evolved and the economy has continued to transform. Reform is needed to ensure this important legislation continues to work effectively in a modern Australia.
The reform package will deliver new strategic approaches and provide a more streamlined assessment process, new national standards for accrediting environmental assessment and approval processes, a new Australian government biodiversity policy for consultation, improved listing of species for protection, identification and protection of ecosystems of national significance, better regulation of international trade in wildlife, more public information, a more cooperative approach to developing environmental standards, better processes for heritage listing and a draft environmental offsets policy for consultation.
The Council of Australian Governments has agreed to a federal government proposal on the need for major reform of environmental regulation across all levels of government. The government rejected the recommendations to introduce an interim greenhouse trigger and to amend provisions relating to the regional forest agreements. The government will be consulting on cost recovery options for the administration of the EPBC Act and will release a consultation paper in the next few weeks. The report by Dr Allan Hawke AC was tabled and publicly released on 21 December 2009. It had 71 recommendations. We did not agree with 15 of those but agreed wholly or in part with the other 56 recommendations. Minister Burke convened five stakeholder roundtables— (Time expired)
Senator WATERS (Queensland) (14:22): Mr President, I ask a supplementary question, also in relation to the EPBC legislative reform package. Will the government consider adding a water trigger into the act to allow consideration of impacts on water systems from proposed developments, including water intensive coal seam gas, noting that under the current design of the act the trigger would only catch significant impacts and therefore would not, as the minister indicated yesterday, mean that every bore on every block of land would require federal assessment?
Senator CONROY (Victoria—Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Digital Productivity) (14:23): Thank you for that supplementary. I have not got any further information on that specific matter. I am happy to take that on notice and come back to you, and on any parts of that first question that I did not quite finish I will also come back to you on those details.
Senator WATERS (Queensland) (14:23): Thank you, Minister. Mr President, I have a further supplementary question, also in relation to the EPBC reforms announced yesterday. Can the minister assure the Senate that the move to formalise and extend the use of offsets for damaging development will not allow otherwise inappropriate development to be approved under the act?
Senator CONROY (Victoria—Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy, Deputy Leader of the Government in the Senate and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister on Digital Productivity) (14:23): We are in the process of going through a draft for consultation. I do not think we have necessarily completed that part of the process, so it would be a little premature of me to give a final government position. But if there is any further information the minister would like to add to that answer I will take that on notice and come back to you.