

Previous Fragment Next Fragment
-
Hansard
- Start of Business
- QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
- DISTINGUISHED VISITORS
-
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
-
National Security
(Raguse, Brett, MP, McClelland, Robert, MP) -
Home Insulation Program
(Abbott, Tony, MP, Garrett, Peter, MP) -
National Security
(Grierson, Sharon, MP, Albanese, Anthony, MP) -
Home Insulation Program
(Wood, Jason, MP, Garrett, Peter, MP) -
Health Workforce
(Burke, Anna, MP, Roxon, Nicola, MP) -
Home Insulation Program
(Abbott, Tony, MP, Garrett, Peter, MP) -
Private Health Insurance
(Gibbons, Steve, MP, Tanner, Lindsay, MP) -
Home Insulation Program
(Laming, Andrew, MP, Garrett, Peter, MP) -
Economy
(Rea, Kerry, MP, Swan, Wayne, MP) -
Resources
(Oakeshott, Rob, MP, Swan, Wayne, MP) -
Health
(George, Jennie, MP, Rudd, Kevin, MP) -
Home Insulation Program
(Scott, Bruce, MP, Garrett, Peter, MP) -
Pensions and Benefits
(Saffin, Janelle, MP, Gillard, Julia, MP) -
Home Insulation Program
(Stone, Dr Sharman, MP, Garrett, Peter, MP) -
Business
(Ripoll, Bernie, MP, Emerson, Craig, MP) -
Home Insulation Program
(Abbott, Tony, MP, Rudd, Kevin, MP) -
Commercial Television: Australian Content
(Price, Roger, MP, Albanese, Anthony, MP)
-
National Security
- PERSONAL EXPLANATIONS
- AUDITOR-GENERAL’S REPORTS
- SPEAKER’S PANEL
- DOCUMENTS
- MATTERS OF PUBLIC IMPORTANCE
- EDUCATION SERVICES FOR OVERSEAS STUDENTS AMENDMENT (RE-REGISTRATION OF PROVIDERS AND OTHER MEASURES) BILL 2009
-
CRIMES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SERIOUS AND ORGANISED CRIME) BILL 2010
CRIMES LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (SERIOUS AND ORGANISED CRIME) BILL (NO. 2) 2010
SAFETY, REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPORT AMENDMENT BILL 2010
HEALTH INSURANCE AMENDMENT (NEW ZEALAND OVERSEAS TRAINED DOCTORS) BILL 2010 - NATIONAL CONSUMER CREDIT PROTECTION AMENDMENT BILL 2010
-
CORPORATIONS AMENDMENT (FINANCIAL MARKET SUPERVISION) BILL 2010
CORPORATIONS (FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 2010 - CORPORATIONS (FEES) AMENDMENT BILL 2010
- BUSINESS
- TAX LAWS AMENDMENT (2009 GST ADMINISTRATION MEASURES) BILL 2009
- HIGHER EDUCATION SUPPORT AMENDMENT (UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON) BILL 2010
- HEALTH INSURANCE AMENDMENT (DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING ACCREDITATION) BILL 2009
- SOCIAL SECURITY AND OTHER LEGISLATION AMENDMENT (WELFARE REFORM AND REINSTATEMENT OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT) BILL 2009
- ADJOURNMENT
- Adjournment
- NOTICES
-
Main Committee
- Start of Business
-
CONSTITUENCY STATEMENTS
- Greenway Electorate: Infrastructure
- Maribyrnong Electorate: Workplace Safety
-
Swan Electorate: Australian Organ Donor Awareness Week
Swan Electorate: World's Greatest Shave - Lowe Electorate: Communities for Communities
-
Flinders Electorate: Phillip Island
Flinders Electorate: Balnarring Pedestrian Crossing - Blair Electorate: Springfield Central
- Paterson Electorate: Mr Ron Elworthy
- Calwell Electorate: National Language Curriculum
- Fisher Electorate: Kawana Hospital
- Newcastle Electorate: Colonial Landscape
- Main Committee Clocks
-
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 3) 2009-2010
APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 4) 2009-2010 - APPROPRIATION BILL (NO. 4) 2009-2010
- Adjournment
- QUESTIONS IN WRITING
Page: 1516
Mr FITZGIBBON (3:34 PM)
—Mr Speaker, I wish to make a personal explanation.
The SPEAKER
—Does the honourable member claim to have been misrepresented?
Mr FITZGIBBON
—Yes.
The SPEAKER
—Please proceed.
Mr FITZGIBBON
—Today Fairfax newspapers ran more stories featuring me, which are untrue and defamatory. Fairfax also reported that I had threatened legal action but had failed to commence that action. This no doubt was designed to question my intention to do so. I can assure Fairfax—and they know this—that I have made demand and I intend to go through with it.
Fairfax also mischievously reported today on court action taken yesterday by Ms Helen Liu but failed to say what it was about. I can inform the House that the action is seeking to force Fairfax to hand over for independent forensic testing documents it claims belong to her and on which it has published a number of highly defamatory stories. Fairfax refuses to hand over the documents. The question now becomes: what is it they have to fear from this independent forensic examination?